California Ballot Challenge

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13279
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#801

Post by Notorial Dissent »

I have to agree with Realist's characterization of Dummyy, I think it is pretty spot on. I keep wondering if anyone bothered to tell the RCNC that Dummyy was their candidate rather than the ones they seem to have run instead? Just askin'.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27528
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#802

Post by bob »

Dummett was on WOBC: There is "no way" that SCOTUS won't hear his case.



=)) =)) =)) =)) =))
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13279
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#803

Post by Notorial Dissent »

Kinda sorta like the CA courts could not help but find in his favor, yet they didn't, repeatedly.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27528
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#804

Post by bob »

SCOTUS No. 14-826:Jan 2 2015 Application (14A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2015 to February 12, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.Jan 7 2015 Application (14A720) denied by Justice Kennedy.Jan 13 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)The cert. petition.No response filed (by either Obama or California). Denial soon.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35011
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#805

Post by realist »









SCOTUS No. 14-826:



Jan 2 2015 Application (14A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2015 to February 12, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Jan 7 2015 Application (14A720) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Jan 13 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)



The cert. petition.





No response filed (by either Obama or California). Denial soon.









But now...



No. 14-826 Title: John Albert Dummett, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State, et al. Docketed: January 13, 2015 Linked with 14A720 Lower Ct: Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District Case Nos.: (C073763, C071764) Decision Date: July 21, 2014 Discretionary Court Decision Date: October 15, 2014

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jan 2 2015 Application (14A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2015 to February 12, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Jan 7 2015 Application (14A720) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Jan 13 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)

[hlyellow]Feb 11 2015 Waiver of right of respondent Alejandro Padilla as California's Secretary of States to respond filed.[/hlyellow]



ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35011
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#806

Post by realist »

No. 14-826 Title: John Albert Dummett, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State, et al. Docketed: January 13, 2015 Linked with 14A720 Lower Ct: Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District Case Nos.: (C073763, C071764) Decision Date: July 21, 2014 Discretionary Court Decision Date: October 15, 2014

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jan 2 2015 Application (14A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 13, 2015 to February 12, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Jan 7 2015 Application (14A720) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Jan 13 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)

Feb 11 2015 Waiver of right of respondent Alejandro Padilla as California's Secretary of States to respond filed.

[hlyellow]Mar 4 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 20, 2015. [/hlyellow]
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27528
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#807

Post by bob »

"For completeness": No. 14-930 (Barnett's petition):Jan 13 2015 Application (14A769) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 27, 2014 to March 28, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy.Jan 16 2015 Application (14A769) denied by Justice Kennedy.Jan 27 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2015)Feb 11 2015 Waiver of right of respondent Alejandro Padilla as California's Secretary of State to respond filed.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45607
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

California Ballot Challenge

#808

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

:wave:

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15986
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

California Ballot Challenge

#809

Post by Reality Check »


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35011
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#810

Post by realist »











:lol:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45607
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

California Ballot Challenge

#811

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

Wrong receptacle!

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

California Ballot Challenge

#812

Post by gupwalla »

This pile isn't worth adding to the water shortage, even with a lo-flo.

So I must conclude that Stern would recycle the petition into environmentally friendly garden mulch.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8734
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

California Ballot Challenge

#813

Post by Northland10 »





"For completeness": No. 14-930 (Barnett's petition):



Jan 13 2015 Application (14A769) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 27, 2014 to March 28, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Jan 16 2015 Application (14A769) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Jan 27 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2015)

Feb 11 2015 Waiver of right of respondent Alejandro Padilla as California's Secretary of State to respond filed.











For, um, completecompletenessness.









Mar 18 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 3, 2015.



On a side note, when searching for the California future deadlist filings, I found it very difficult to type Dummett without typing Dumbass instead.
10 Years on Fogbow

North-land: of the family 10


UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35011
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#814

Post by realist »

I'm shocked. SHOCKED!! I tells ya.



Certiorari DENINED!!







14-826

DUMMETT, JOHN A., ET AL. V. PADILLA, ALEX, ET AL.





http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cour ... r_b97d.pdf
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 13279
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#815

Post by Notorial Dissent »

Well, color me shocked, too, also!!!!! Now for Pambly. :lol:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

California Ballot Challenge

#816

Post by SueDB »

Birfism suffered another staggering blow today at the Supreme Court... :o :o :o



-xx -xx -xx



I hope this finally drives a damn stake in this one.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 23181
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

California Ballot Challenge

#817

Post by RTH10260 »





Birfism suffered another staggering blow today at the Supreme Court... :o :o :o



-xx -xx -xx



I hope this finally drives a damn stake in this one.





Take care, they will appeal to the World Supremes Court in the Hague :roll:

User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 8308
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

California Ballot Challenge

#818

Post by RoadScholar »





Birfism suffered another staggering blow wins another moral victory today at the Supreme Court... :o :o :o







In reality, an obvious instance of the Regime, terrified of revealing the Truth™, silencing yet another Patriot. [/birferthink]
The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

California Ballot Challenge

#819

Post by gupwalla »

I don't know if this is the right thread or not. But here goes:



From today's SCOTUS Orders, 4-6-2015:



BARNETT, PAMELA V. PADILLA, ALEX, ET AL. - Petition for certiorari is denied.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35011
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#820

Post by realist »





I don't know if this is the right thread or not. But here goes:



From today's SCOTUS Orders, 4-6-2015:



BARNETT, PAMELA V. PADILLA, ALEX, ET AL. - Petition for certiorari is denied.







SHOCKING!!
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31131
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

California Ballot Challenge

#821

Post by mimi »

So many birfer tears today!

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 12369
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

California Ballot Challenge

#822

Post by Whatever4 »

So are there any outstanding** birther cases?





** outstanding as in not finished, not as in exceptional. Because so few of them were.
"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8734
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

California Ballot Challenge

#823

Post by Northland10 »





So are there any outstanding** birther cases?





** outstanding as in not finished, not as in exceptional. Because so few of them were.







Grinols is still hanging out in the 9th Circuit.
10 Years on Fogbow

North-land: of the family 10


UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27528
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

California Ballot Challenge

#824

Post by bob »

So are there any outstanding** birther cases? ** outstanding as in not finished, not as in exceptional. Because so few of them were.According my count, the pending birther cases are:1. Grinols (Taitz's; pending in the 9th);2. Judy (10th just denied, but SCOTUS cert. petition possible);3. Judd (E.D. Cal.; pro se, not Taitz's case);4. Strunk (one just dismissed, another affirmed, so appeals still possible; also something in D.C.);5. Taitz's latest in South Texas.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

California Ballot Challenge

#825

Post by Paul Lentz »









So are there any outstanding** birther cases?





** outstanding as in not finished, not as in exceptional. Because so few of them were.



According my count, the pending birther cases are:

1. Grinols (Taitz's; pending in the 9th);

2. Judy (10th just denied, but SCOTUS cert. petition possible);

3. Judd (E.D. Cal.; pro se, not Taitz's case);

4. Strunk (one just dismissed, another affirmed, so appeals still possible; also something in D.C.);

5. Taitz's latest in South Texas.







Did SCOTUS kick Tracy Fair to the curb yet?
The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

Post Reply

Return to “State Ballot Challenges”