orly taitz
June 9th, 2012 @ 12:48 pm
no, i am the lead plaintiff, as I was in NH. Indiana allows elections fraud complaints to be submitted by anyone. I submitted my own complaint and the sec of state and the Elections commission ignored it

[/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/?p=102709&cpage=1#comment-208120]
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=102709&c ... ent-208120
Indiana law does not allow that. She never filed form CAN-1 with the elections commission. She sent 209 pages of poo with a HAVA complaint form. That has been ignored.
But she had no standing before the IEC, never filed with the IEC and cannot complaint about anything IEC has done.Well, at least we now know why Orly thinks she has standing.
Am I following this now? In Indiana, she totally inappropriately filed a HAVA complaint along with her "certified copy" of the Georgia transcript (sans findings of course). (That abuse of HAVA alone makes me boil over
http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/rtfm/t2426.gif but I am also relieved that it was therefore ignored and scarce resources spared.)
So she thinks her standing is justified because she thinks they should have allowed her to appear as a plaintiff before the Election Commission? Even if that were her argument, that isn't what is argued in the papers, IIRC.
Oh, she is so in for a surprise. I am still hoping it will be broadcast, at least the audio, but so far it doesn't look like that is planned.