Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

These people are weird, but we like to find out what weird people are doing and thinking. It's a hobby.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#1

Post by Luke »

On the old board, spent some time on Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. He falsely claims he invented email, here's a story about why he's a liar: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190 ... mail.shtml He's currently in a lawsuit with the State of MA over his loss and tweets that were reported to Twitter. "Shiva Ayyadurai decided to sue Massachusetts' Secretary William Galvin, claiming that efforts to have some of Shiva's tweets removed from Twitter violated the 1st Amendment." Ayyadurai v. Galvin (1:20-cv-11889)
District Court, D. Massachusetts

He's an election truther, he did videos with Jim Hoft of Gateway House of Boys and gave his "expert" advice in several of the bogus hearings.

He also is an anti-vaxxer. Looks like Twitter had enough, his account was suspended in Feb: @va_shiva Account suspended

What's funny about this now is that his whole lawsuit is about Twitter and suspensions -- but as MA points out, the tweet they objected to was never removed. And it's highly, highly unlikely they contacted Twitter again; users can report content and must have since he was spreading tons of false election and COVID info.
U.S. Senate Candidate Shiva Ayyadurai’s Twitter Account Suspended
India-West Staff Reporter Feb 8, 2021 0

Shiva Ayyadurai, an Indian American Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Massachusetts, has had his Twitter account suspended by the social media giant. According to various media reports, the Belmont resident and self-proclaimed creator of the email had his profile @va_shiva suspended for a violation of Twitter rules, his profile page read Feb. 4. His entire timeline of tweets and photos are gone, the reports noted.

Twitter did not specify why his account was suspended. Ayyadurai, who ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate in 2018 and again in 2020, said he believes it is because he tweeted about Secretary of State William Galvin and Michelle Tassinari, the state's director of elections, reports said. "Twitter was coerced by the Government - Secretary of State Galvin and State Election Director Tassinari because I exposed TASSINARI violated Federal Law by deleting ballot images," Ayyadurai said in an email to local media outlets. "[It] forced Twitter to do this. Only the Secretary of State can & must restore my Twitter account; otherwise, we live in Putin's Russia or Communist China," the email continued.

Ayyadurai accused Tassinari of deleting a million electronic ballots during the 2020 Massachusetts primary and general election and filed a lawsuit against Galvin and Tassinari to that effect late last year. Galvin and Tassinari have denied the claim, noting the state's ballots are paper, the reports said. Ayyadurai has been accused of using social media to spread misinformation about the coronavirus pandemic, including posting the virus has been spread by the "deep state" and can be treated with vitamin C. He accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of being a "Deep State Plant" and called for him to be fired, it said.

Ayyadurai was born in India. He holds four degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, including a Ph.D. in biological engineering. In his 2018 campaign against Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Ayyadurai appeared in a livestream with Matthew Colligan, who was photographed holding a torch and marching in the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which has been widely condemned as supporting white supremacy. His campaign slogan in 2018 was "Only a real Indian can defeat a fake Indian," a reference to Warren's claim she is of Cherokee descent, the reports noted.
https://www.indiawest.com/news/global_i ... 44365.html

Here's background from Techdirt about the lawsuit: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20201 ... tion.shtml

Back in October, Shiva tried a TRO that MA wouldn't contact Twitter again about him. The judge decided that there might be some 1A issues, so he let it drag on:

Oct 29, 2020 Opposition re 2 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (including memorandum) filed by William Francis Galvin. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Debra O'Malley, # 2 Affidavit of Michelle K. Tassinari (with Exhibit))(Hornstine, Adam) (Entered: 10/29/2020)
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 8.15.0.pdf

In December, MA filed a MTD: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 8.36.0.pdf


Shiva just filed a Second Amended Complaint (108 pages): https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 8.78.0.pdf

Didn't get to read the new complaint yet, but in his previous Complaint, he did a whole big song & dance about how carefully he marketed and curated his Twitter feed for 10 years or something, and that the world would come to an end if he was banned. Well dude, doesn't look like it ended. He also has this bizarre theory that he kept posting (this is what got him in trouble) that "MA destroyed over a million ballots". They explained repeatedly that it wasn't true, and several fact check groups smacked him down. The spreading of this misinformation is what led MA Elections to report it to Twitter (State Election officers have special access to a reporting portal).
Massachusetts primary ballots were not destroyed
By JUDE JOFFE-BLOCK
September 28, 2020 GMT
CLAIM: Massachusetts destroyed over 1 million ballots and committed election fraud. Ballot images that must be saved for 22 months are nowhere to be found.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Physical ballots have not been destroyed. They are being stored for 22 months as required by federal law. Massachusetts election officials do not capture and preserve ballot images when they tabulate votes. They are not required to do so.

THE FACTS: No Senate ballots have been destroyed in Massachusetts, according to Debra O’Malley, a spokesperson for Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Galvin. “The ballots, as required by law, are still under seal in each of the 351 local election offices,” O’Malley told The Associated Press. A federal statute requires election officials to preserve for 22 months “all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting” for elections for federal races.

Yet even as state election officials have made clear physical ballots have been preserved, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, who lost in the Massachusetts Republican Senate primary earlier this month, is making the misleading claim that the state committed election fraud by destroying over 1 million “ballots.” In a tweet that was picked up by the right-wing site,The Gateway Pundit and has been shared on Facebook, he wrote, “Massachusetts Destroys Over 1 MILLION Ballots in US SENATE PRIMARY RACE committing #ElectionFraud. MA Elections Attorney confirms to #Shiva4Senate ballot images - used for counting votes - that MUST be saved by FEDERAL LAW for 22 months are nowhere to be found!”

O’Malley called Ayyadurai’s Sept. 24 tweet election misinformation. In an email exchange with the AP, Ayyadurai did not dispute that election officials have preserved physical ballots. His argument is that state election officials acted improperly by not preserving ballot images when the ballots were counted and scanned -- and that ballot images should be considered “ballots.” “Pursuant to chain of custody, the ballot image IS the ballot, and destroying these ballots is illegal by Federal Law,” Ayyadurai wrote in an e-mail.

Massachusetts election equipment does not capture and preserve ballot images when it tabulates votes, said O’Malley. State statutes bar anyone from re-examining ballots outside of a recount, post-election audit or court order. “Because of those statutes...our certified tabulator vendors are instructed to turn that functionality off on equipment used in Massachusetts,” O’Malley told the AP. Charles Stewart, an elections expert and political science professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said federal law does not require the preservation of ballot images, just physical ballots.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checkin ... 9472752830

Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18 ... -v-galvin/
36 Dec 9, 2020 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ( Responses due by 12/23/2020) by William Francis Galvin, Debra O'Malley, Michelle K. Tassinari.(Hornstine, Adam) (Entered: 12/09/2020) Main Doc­ument Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction AND Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

***omitted some entries here***

63 Feb 19, 2021 Judge Mark L. Wolf: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff shall, by February 26, 2021, report whether he requests leave to file an amended complaint adding Twitter as a defendant and, if so, file an affidavit and memorandum in support of that motion. See Rule 7.1(b)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Defendants shall, by March 8, 2021, respond to any such motion. (Loret, Magdalena) (Entered: 02/19/2021)

***omitted some entries here***

75 Mar 25, 2021 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall by April 7, 2021, file his proposed Second Amended Complaint with Twitter as a Defendant, serve it on Twitter, and report when Twitter has been served. Twitter shall within 10 days of being served, state whether or not it wishes to respond to the Motion, and, if so, do so 10 days thereafter.( proposed second amended complaint due by 4/7/2021.)(Montes, Mariliz) (Entered: 03/26/2021) Main Doc­ument Order

76 Mar 31, 2021 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 72 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Opposition by Shiva Ayyadurai. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Loret, Magdalena) (Entered: 03/31/2021) Main Doc­ument

77 Apr 4, 2021 REPLY to Response to 64 MOTION for Joinder filed by Shiva Ayyadurai. (Ayyadurai, Shiva) (Entered: 04/04/2021) Main Doc­ument Reply to Response to Motion

78 Apr 6, 2021 AMENDED COMPLAINT PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shiva Ayyadurai.(Ayyadurai, Shiva) (Entered: 04/06/2021) Main Doc­ument Amended Complaint

79 Apr 7, 2021 Main Doc­ument Status Report
This dude is such a jerk and idiot that he's been a little pet project... but hadn't thought of him lately and hadn't seen he got the hammer on Twitter. That's pretty delightful, Jim Hoft of the Gateway House of Boys is also suspended. Guess they will be front and center on Frank, Mike Lindell's new service. When they spread more election and COVID lies, wonder what Frank will do about it?
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
noblepa
Posts: 2403
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Retired IT Nerd

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#2

Post by noblepa »

orlylicious wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:37 amWhen they spread more election and COVID lies, wonder what Frank will do about it?
Frank (Mike Lindell) will do nothing about it.

First of all, the lies that they post will be the same lies that Mike Lindell has been posting.

Secondly, Lindell claims that there will be absolutely no censorship on Frank. That policy will last until the first person posts a message refuting the lies. I'm sure that any person attempting to debunk or refute the lies will be instantly banned.

When Lindell claims there will be no censorship, he of course means that there will be no censorship of right-wing lies. Left wing truth is, however, an entirely different matter.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#3

Post by Luke »

Sooo... this is from the Gateway House of Boys, of course, they go nuts and wildly overexaggerate.

Damn. Realist, are we PANICKING?
HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Federal Judge Signals He May END Twitter’s Immunity in Dr. Shiva Case – Speech Police in Panic — Watch Hearing Live By Ben Wetmore Published May 15, 2021 at 8:20am

A federal judge in Massachusetts is going to make Twitter explain whether or not it is a “state actor” or a truly private company, and the effects could be significant in reigning in Big Tech’s oppression of conservative views. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, the man who invented email, :liar: ran for US Senate in Massachusetts as a Republican and made allegations of voter fraud on Twitter. These tweets were then deleted by the far-left tech giant. Later it was discovered that they were deleted at the direction of government employees of the Massachusetts Secretary of State’s office. Discovering this, Dr. Ayyadurai filed a federal lawsuit by himself, alleging that his federal civil rights were violated when the government silenced his political speech in order to affect an election.

Federal Judge Mark L. Wolf, a 1985 Reagan Appointee, has set a hearing on pending motions for May 20, 2021 at 9:30AM EST. His court orders make it quite clear he is taking this case seriously and the court is highlighting several relevant cases that should give Twitter and its Big Tech bully buddies some pause.

By quoting these two cases, legal observers note, the judge is signaling that Twitter’s days of claiming it is a private company so as to avoid it’s clear oppression of conservative speech, banning scores of conservative journalists, and promotion of liberal views, may be coming to a close end:

Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921, 1928 (2019)
“A private entity can qualify as a state actor in a few limited circumstances-including, for example, … when the government compels the private entity to take a particular action…”

Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 1004 (1982)
“a State normally can be held responsible for a private decision only when it has exercised coercive power or has provided such significant encouragement, either overt or covert, that the choice must in law be deemed to be that of the State”

This case could spell the end of CDA 230. CDA 230 is the provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that gives internet and social media companies legal immunity from lawsuits due to the content they publish. This provision in law gives companies like Facebook and Twitter a way to dismiss lawsuits, but it also gives them the ability to act with impunity so that their actions cannot be legally challenged. These companies have, according to their detractors, abused this immunity by suppressing dissident, and specifically conservative, views, viewpoints and journalism.

Because Dr. Ayyadurai did not argue about Twitter’s “Terms of Service” everything will instead hinge on the degree of interaction between Twitter and the state government of Massachusetts. And according to Dr. Ayyadurai, those links have already been proven in testimony, since Twitter has built a special portal offered to certain governmental entities so that government officials can flag and delete content they dislike for any reason, as part of what they call “Twitter Partner Status.”

** Read more on the case here. https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twi ... n-lawsuit/

This sets the stage for this court asking whether CDA 230 can be used to violate someone’s civil rights by letting the government do something via a private company what it could not otherwise do: silence their political speech. Dr. Ayyadurai is claiming that the Constitution trumps CDA 230 and the government cannot outsource to private actors to silence people’s speech they disagree with, and that the government and Twitter are acting together as one: that Twitter is essentially a state actor.

Conservative journalist Charles Johnson was the first journalist banned off Twitter in 2015. Conservative journalist James O’Keefe was the first to reveal that Twitter “shadow banned” political views it disagreed with in 2018, O’Keefe was later permanently banned from Twitter.

Gateway Pundit Publisher Jim Hoft was permanently banned off of Twitter after posting video evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election in Michigan in February this year.

Almost every court that has looked at CDA 230 immunity since 2001 has preserved the immunity of social media companies. This is the first time in over 20 years where there has ever been a potential to strike it down or to suggest the Constitution is superior to the law and an ISP under the act could be a ‘state actor’ for purposes of civil rights law.

This is the first case of its kind to even have a chance according to legal observers.

There is some concern expressed among some that Twitter and Facebook may welcome the end of CDA 230, so as to remove all competition for social media dominance by increasing state regulation. This tactic is known in economic circles as “rent seeking” and “moat building” where dominant corporate entities seek to increase the regulatory burden on others to preclude competition and innovation among upstarts who might challenge their market dominance.

The hearing is set for Thursday, May 20th.

** You can donate to support Dr. Shiva here.
** You can watch the hearing live on Zoom on May 20.
** To register for Zoom hearing, visit https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html and then select the date Thursday May 20, 2021, and Judge Wolf
.

You can only sign up for the Zoom hearing 2 days before at the link.


Shiva uploaded this to archive.org 5/10. He's been banned from Twitter. Judge Wolf is giving this a lot of attention, wouldn't have expected it. Anybody here want to be an Amici? Or let Orly Taitz now about it? She's a 1st Amendment specialist as well as a Civil Rights attorney, isn't she?

Ayyadurai - Memorandum and Order of 5/10/21
by United States District Court - District of Massachusetts
https://archive.org/details/another-key ... ey%20Order

It's only three pages:

Shiva 1.JPG
Shiva 1.JPG (91.04 KiB) Viewed 4792 times

Shiva 2.JPG
Shiva 2.JPG (213.58 KiB) Viewed 4792 times


Author Ben Wetmore sounded like a promising twink name for Jim Hoft. But, there are photos that appear that something's gone wrong with Wetmore. Think this is the same guy?

Ben Wetmore.JPG
Ben Wetmore.JPG (91.66 KiB) Viewed 4792 times

No tweets from @benwetmore since 2020. If it's this guy, Jim's just using Wetmore for his vast legal experience (see below).

District Court judge candidate has ties to controversial activist
Philip Jankowski @PhilJankowski
Jan 29, 2018 at 12:01 AM Sep 25, 2018 at 10:36 PM

On the streets of Boston a decade ago, Benjamin Wetmore and James O’Keefe gathered signatures on a petition seeking to find people who would be willing to bring Guantanamo Bay detainees into their homes. It was one of many political stunts the conservative activists performed on hidden camera. The Boston stunt, in which the two pretended to be volunteers for the Love Thy Prisoner Campaign, was a precursor for O’Keefe and his fledgling Project Veritas, an outfit that uses undercover video and staged encounters in an attempt to reveal media bias. O’Keefe would soon be making national news. Wetmore remained largely behind the scenes, and his involvement with O’Keefe waned over the years.

Now Wetmore is running for state District Court judge in Hays County. Wetmore, a Buda-area resident, is running for 428th District Court judge, a post that has jurisdiction over civil, criminal and family law cases. With no Democrat running, the election will be decided on March 6 in the Republican primary against incumbent Judge Bill Henry. The winner will be elected to a four-year term, earning roughly $160,000 a year.

Wetmore’s history as a lawyer in Hays County is almost nonexistent, with a search of court records showing him as an attorney on one case in 2015. However, his history as an associate and even a mentor of O’Keefe and later the guerrilla journalism nonprofit American Phoenix Project is well documented. Wetmore, 38, has known O’Keefe, the outspoken activist behind the 2009 videos that unraveled the nonprofit community organizing group ACORN, since at least 2004. Wetmore told the American-Statesman that he no longer has a relationship with O’Keefe.
https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20180129 ... l-activist

Wetmore's website is, um, sparse, to say the least. http://www.benwetmore.com/

Attorney for hire.
bwetmore -at- google's mail service -dot- com
(512) 865-0735
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#4

Post by Luke »

Okey dokey -- this is a pet case have been following, will be interesting to see the result. Personally, think it's BS, Twitter can ban whomever they want. Don't agree that just because MA alerted Twitter to election disinformation they became a "state actor". Judge Wolf has admitted he's technologically ignorant; he may not realize that giving this oxygen is just stirring up the Gateway House of Boys and all the election truthers. But let's see what happens.
Man who really wants his Twitter account back gets court-appointed lawyer to take on his increasingly convoluted conspiracy case against election officials
By adamg on Fri, 05/21/2021 - 9:54pm

A federal judge today told Shiva Ayyadurai he would dip into a court fund to help pay for a prominent downtown lawyer to bring some sense to Ayyadurai's legal case against Secretary of State William Galvin's office and, possibly, Twitter, which as of today involves claims that the state and a national association of elections officials built a coast-to-coast racketeering effort in which Twitter acts as "the executioner" to dispense with online criticism of the state's sinister machinations by deplatforming people like him. US District Court Judge Mark Wolf told Ayyadurai that he believes that the heart of the case is that Ayyadurai wants his Twitter account back and that a lawyer would help get the case to the core First Amendment and jurisdictional issues that Wolf sees as crucial to Ayyadurai's case. When Ayyadurai first brought his case last October, he was seeking to overturn the Sept. 1 Republican primary, which he lost, alleging Galvin's office destroyed 1 million ballots, which the state has consistently derided as nonsense, largely because Ayyadurai claims the ballots were electronic copies, which the state says it does not even make. But the case now focuses on Twitter's decision in early February to deactivate his Twitter account for repeatedly claiming massive fraud by state elections officials.

People who bring civil lawsuits are not normally granted court-appointed and funded lawyers, but Wolf said he would make an exception for Ayyadurai because his case raises some crucial issues related to the First Amendment and the question of when a private company becomes, essentially, an agent of the state and so subject to the First Amendment, which normally does not apply to private companies. In fact, Wolf said today, Ayyadurai's case raises issues that he could see becoming "a potential law-school exam in constitutional law." As he said yesterday, Wolf said Ayyadurai may have made a case plausible enough to go to trial on whether complaints the state and the national association filed with Twitter in September when coupled with Twitter's decision to cut him off in February made Twitter into a "state actor" that unconstitutionally stomped on Ayyadurai's First Amendment rights.

Lawyers for the state, the association and Twitter - which Ayyadurai did not initially sue, but which he is now trying to get added to the suit - say Twitter ignored the September complaints and took action in February entirely on its own after determining Ayyadurai kept making illegitimate election-fraud claims in January, something that, as a private company, with its own First Amendment right to determine what goes on its platform, it is allowed to do. Ayyadurai said he would agree to talk to Wolf's suggested lawyer, Howard Cooper of Todd & Weld, whom Wolf praised for his understanding of First Amendment issues. Wolf added that he had similarly appointed Cooper to represent Whitey Bulger in the 1990s, before he disappeared, and, more recently, an alleged MS-13 member rounded up after a series of teens were murdered in 2015 and 2016. Wolf gave Ayyadurai until Thursday to formally agree to bringing on Cooper.

Wolf said he agreed to appoint counsel both because of the issues involved and because one of Ayyadurai's claims is that he brought the case by himself because he could not afford a lawyer after Twitter cut him off in January. In fact, however, Ayyadurai's initial suit was filed Oct. 20 by a Plymouth lawyer, whom Ayyadurai fired a week later - long before Twitter disabled his account permanently. At a hearing today, Ayyadurai went through a guide for election officials on how to deal with online misinformation, in part by pointing out ways to file complaints with Twitter. He seized on the fact that both the Galvin aide he's suing and the executive director of the National Association of State Election Directors, whom he is also suing are listed as contributors and said the guide proved how elections officials have turned Twitter into their mega-censoring tool. A lawyer for the association, however, said the guide, in fact, shows the opposite, because one of its points is that, as a private company, Twitter is free to ignore complaints from election officials - which he and state lawyers said is exactly what Twitter did with their complaint about Ayyadurai last fall.
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/man-w ... -back-gets
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
fierceredpanda
Posts: 590
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:11 pm
Location: BAR Headquarters - Turn left at the portrait of George III
Occupation: Criminal defense attorney. I am not your lawyer. My posts != legal advice.

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#5

Post by fierceredpanda »

Suggestion for an alternate headline: Self-Proclaimed "Inventor of Email" Still Somehow Too Poor to Afford Own Lawyer
"There's no play here. There's no angle. There's no champagne room. I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor. The math on this is simple. The smaller the mess, the easier it is for me to clean up." -Michael Clayton
TheNewSaint
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:55 am

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#6

Post by TheNewSaint »

Tornillo v Miami Herald.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#7

Post by Luke »

Update about Shiva:
Losing Senate candidate who claims evil state officials kept him from hiring a lawyer now has two; judge says fine, but court will not pay for either
By adamg on Tue, 06/01/2021 - 10:18pm

Shiva Ayyadurai, who has taken to claiming Secretary of State William Galvin and his top election official are orchestrating a global plot involving Twitter to destroy him, last week told a judge who had been willing to dip into a court fund to help pay for one lawyer that he now has two lawyers, including one who had previously represented Hulk Hogan and Donald and Melania Trump. In response, US District Court Judge Mark Wolf ruled today that Ayyadurai can hire both attorneys if he wants, but only at his own expense. And he cast some doubt on Ayyadurai's plan to have the lawyers help him write his legal motions and carry out depositions but to let Ayyadurai argue his own case in court.
***
Wolf said Ayyadurai had made a "plausible" enough case on the alleged interference with his campaign and raised enough interesting constitutional issues that he would dip into a court fund and help pay for a prominent downtown attorney, Howard Cooper of Todd & Weld, to represent him. But on Thursday, Ayyadurai told the court he had retained not just Cooper but Charles Harder of Los Angeles, who represented Hulk Hogan in his successful defamation suit against Gawker, Melania Trump in a successful defamation suit against a British newspaper and Donald Trump in his successful defense of a defamation suit by Stormy Daniels. In an order today, Wolf said the man who claims to have invented email can have all the lawyers he wants, but that the court won't be paying for any of them. Wolf also wrote that if Ayyadurai does hire the lawyers - who have yet to the judge for formal permission to join the case - he may not get to make all of his own arguments in court, that Wolf would decide that on a case by case basis. And, the judge continued, Ayyadurai needs to knock it off with his proposed schedule for discovery - interviewing potential witnesses and digging up possible evidence - at least until after a hearing among all the sides scheduled for June 15.
***
Twitter, which Ayyadurai is now seeking to add to his suit, expressed no opinion on his hiring decisions, but said it objected to Ayyadurai's proposed discovery order, saying that it's not yet a party to the suit, its terms of service, which he agreed to, require any case against it to be made in San Francisco and that, in any case, its First Amendment rights would bar any proposed interrogation of its executives and workers.
In the absence of extraordinary circumstances that are not present here, the First Amendment bars compelled disclosure regarding such protected editorial decisions and processes, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, prohibits subjecting Twitter to the burdens of litigation that such discovery would entail.
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/losin ... evil-state


Memo & Order from Judge Wolf: https://www.universalhub.com/files/ayya ... unding.pdf
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#8

Post by Luke »

So Dr. Shiva pissed off Judge Wolf again. Hearing tomorrow at 2pm, you can register for the Zoom hearing. The first article is talking sanctions including dismissal, the second article from the Gateway House of Boys says it's the PENTAGON PAPERS and Section 230 is coming down over this! Tough to tell which is right. :P
United States District Court District of Massachusetts Boston, Massachusetts
Division/Location: Boston
Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2021
Judge: Judge Wolf

Calendar - Wednesday, August 4, 2021
Senior District Judge Mark L. Wolf - Remote Proceeding : Boston
2:00 PM

1:20-CV-11889
Hearing
Ayyadurai
(Cooper, Cornell, et al)
v.
Galvin
(Mitchell, Hornstine, et al)
https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html


Failed senate candidate learns you can only push a federal judge so far; he could be facing criminal-contempt charges in his conspiracy-based lawsuit against Bill Galvin
By adamg on Fri, 07/16/2021 - 10:36pm

A federal judge today refused to let Shiva Ayyadurai fire his lawyers from his case against the Secretary of State's office and said his attempt to do so and hire a new lawyer the day before he was supposed to file an amended complaint to bring Twitter into the case is the latest in a pattern of failing to obey court rules and the judge has had quite enough. US District Judge Mark Wolf today ordered Ayyadurai to file a private explanation why he felt the need to fire the law firm initially recommended by Wolf and a public explanation of "why the court should not institute civil and/or criminal contempt proceedings against him" for not complying with an earlier ruling to file his amended complaint by yesterday. Wolf added that among the potential sanctions he could levy is to simply dismiss the suit.

Ayyadurai's current iteration of his argument is that Bill Galvin and his minions conspired with Twitter and used software imported from Great Britain to deprive him of his Constitutionally protected voice on Twitter and so cost him election to the US Senate last year - two years after he failed to convince voters he was the "Real Indian" who deserved to take over from Elizabeth Warren. Twitter is a private company and so not normally subject to the First Amendment, but as the case has gone on, Wolf has said repeatedly that Ayyadurai, who has mostly conducted the case pro se, has raised significant questions about how a private company such as Twitter can be deemed a "state actor" subject to the First Amendment. Wolf has said a key question for him is whether a complaint the Secretary of State's office filed with Twitter last fall about an Ayyadurai tweet declaring the state had destroyed one million ballots for the September Republican primary, which Ayyadurai lost to somebody whose name few people now remember, enough of a nexus to bend Twitter, either willingly or not, to the will of Galvin's might as a government official. Twitter ignored the complaint that the tweet was completely wrong, but then permanently yanked Ayyadurai's account in February for what it said were repeated election falsehoods; Ayyadurai says it did so at Galvin's beckoning, not because of its own internal algorithms established after Jan. 6 to try to deplatform election deniers and violence promoters.

Wolf was so impressed with the questions Ayyadurai was raising that he offered to dip into court funds to hire an experienced downtown lawyer, Howard Cooper of Todd & Weld, to represent him, after Ayyadurai claimed Twitter's ban meant he had lost his main fundraising effort - even though he had fired his initial lawyer months before the ban went into effect. Ayyadurai accepted. Then Ayyadurai said he would be bringing on a second lawyer - the guy who represented Hulk Hogan in his suit against Gawker, and Ayyadurai himself in one of his suits over his claims to have invented e-mail - and the judge rescinded his payment offer. But at the same time, Wolf has repeatedly cautioned Ayyadurai that even people suing by themselves need to comply with court rules - including filing documents by the deadlines set by judges. Yesterday was the date Wolf had set for Ayyadurai to file his amended lawsuit naming Twitter as a defendant along with Galvin, his top elections aide and a national association of state elections officials.

On Wednesday, however, Cooper and two other Todd & Weld lawyers who had signed onto the case asked for permission to be dropped from the case, saying Ayyadurai had fired them the day before. Todd & Weld understands and believes that Dr. Shiva will be proceeding on a pro se basis in this matter although he may engage counsel at some point in the future. In fact, not long after they filed that request, lawyers at another downtown law firm, Cornell Dolan, P.C., asked for permission to enter the case as Ayyadurai's new lawyers - and asked that the judge delay yesterday's deadline by six weeks to let them review the case and file a good amended complaint. His proposed new filing date would have been one day after Wolf had scheduled hearings on the proposed new complaint. The Hulk Hogan lawyer, meanwhile, has never filed the required motion asking permission to formally join the case. In an order today, Wolf said he's had enough.

Allowing either the Motion to Withdraw or the Motion for Extension of Time would unreasonably delay the resolution of the complex issues presented in this case. This delay would be prejudicial to the defendants sued individually for money damages, who have argued that plaintiff's claims against them individually should be dismissed based on qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has repeatedly stressed that "qualified immunity questions should be resolved at the earliest possible stage of a litigation." Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 646, n.6 (1987). At the May 20, 2021 Hearing, the court stated that "all of the individual defendants in my current tentative conception and Twitter have qualified immunity that protects them from claims . . . against the individuals personally." Granting the six-week extension plaintiff seeks would, therefore, prejudice the individual defendants by subjecting them to further uncertainty and anxiety, among other things, probably unnecessarily.

He noted all the times he told Ayyadurai during his pro-se days that he had broken one court rule or another and that even though non-lawyers can't be expected to know all the ins and outs of federal court procedures, Ayyadurai had better start reading up on those rules. Despite these warnings, plaintiff chose to terminate Todd & Weld and retain new counsel the day before he was required to file both his revised Second Amended Complaint and his supporting memorandum of law. Plaintiff was undoubtedly aware that replacing counsel just before these submissions were due would make it impossible for him to comply with the deadline set in the June 16, 2021 Order. Plaintiff has provided "no good reason why [he] could not have worked with [his] original counsel until a replacement was identified" and an orderly transition occurred, instead of retaining Mr. Cornell at the eleventh hour and requesting a six-week extension.

In a possible indication of his judicial anger, Wolf referred to Ayyadurai in his ruling as "Dr. Ayyadurai," rather than the "Dr. Shiva" he had been calling him in hearings at Ayyadurai's request. In his order, Wolf told Ayyadurai and his old and new lawyers they have until Thursday to provide the explanations he wants of what happened and why Ayyadurai shouldn't be sanctioned - and to file a formal memorandum of opposition to motions by the current defendants to dismiss the case, or an explanation why they can't file one. Galvin, his elections aide and the national association will then have until July 28 to respond to the issue of possible sanctions against Ayyadurai. And, Wolf concluded: A hearing on the issues addressed in this Memorandum and Order and a scheduling conference shall be held, by videoconference or in court, on August 4, 2021, at 11:00 am. Dr. Ayyadurai shall attend and be prepared to testify if necessary.
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/faile ... -only-push

Meanwhile, the Gateway House of Boys (and Pundits) says Dr. Shiva has the new PENTAGON PAPERS!

HUGE: Dr. Shiva Discovers Existence of the Secretive Long Fuse Report — Exposes Twitter-Government Collusion — As Momentous Discovery as Pentagon Papers …Update: Hearing Tomorrow with Link
By Jim Hoft
Published August 3, 2021 at 7:45am

Previously we reported on Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai was able to uncover Twitter’s “partner support portal.” Dr. Shiva discovered that Twitter built a special portal offered to certain governmental entities so that government officials can flag and delete content they dislike for any reason, as part of what they call their “Twitter Partner Status.” Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, the man who invented email, ran for US Senate in Massachusetts as a Republican and made allegations of voter fraud on Twitter. These tweets were then deleted by the far-left tech giant. Later it was discovered that they were deleted at the direction of government employees of the Massachusetts Secretary of State’s office. Discovering this, Dr. Ayyadurai filed a federal lawsuit by himself, alleging that his federal civil rights were violated when the government silenced his political speech in order to affect an election.

Legal observers noted back in May that the judge is signaling that Twitter’s days of claiming it is a private company so as to avoid it’s clear oppression of conservative speech, banning scores of conservative journalists, and promotion of liberal views, may be coming to a close end: This case could spell the end of CDA 230. :lol: CDA 230 is the provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that gives internet and social media companies legal immunity from lawsuits due to the content they publish. This provision in law gives companies like Facebook and Twitter a way to dismiss lawsuits, but it also gives them the ability to act with impunity so that their actions cannot be legally challenged. These companies have, according to their detractors, abused this immunity by suppressing dissident, and specifically conservative, views, viewpoints and journalism.

Because Dr. Ayyadurai did not argue about Twitter’s “Terms of Service,” everything will instead hinge on the degree of interaction between Twitter and the state government of Massachusetts. We noticed back in early July that Dr. Shiva’s lawsuit also included the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED): We’ve reported on the NASED previously. This group of election directors in the US, as well as the group of Secretaries of State, worked with the UN before the 2020 election: These non-profits received donations from voting machine companies, ballot printing companies, Zuckerberg’s non-profit as well as a Hillary-related non-profit in 2020. And we also know that NASED was working with Twitter to prevent free speech in the US.

In late July Dr. Shiva released another explosive report. Dr. Shiva revealed how election officials and government actors work together to coordinate with social media platforms to silence speech in America.


Image



Dr. Shiva described this discovery in his latest amended legal complaint filed on July 22.

1. This case is about the government surveilling and blacklisting a minority, political candidate Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai (“Dr. Shiva”), and then eventually silencing his speech, in the midst of his U.S. Senate campaign, because he criticized government officials, thereby violating his First Amendment rights – the foundational principle of the United States.

2. Starting in June of 2020, Dr. Shiva, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, was one of the top six (6) individuals in the United States who had been identified,in The Long Fuse Report, as an Influence Operator (IO) per the Playbooks (created by the Defendants), and was under 24/7 surveillance by teams working 4-hour shifts, using an infrastructure – of technology and relationships as shown in Exhibit A, coarchitected by the Defendants in this case. Dr. Shiva is mentioned twenty-two (22) times in The Long Fuse Report.

3. Starting in October 2017, government officials concluded that though the nature of U.S. elections was decentralized – spread across 10,000 jurisdictions and using different kinds of machines (and diverse methods: paper and electronic) – was the best defense to cyberhacking, they needed to eliminate such decentralization because it was a hindrance to their desire to establish and use a centralized infrastructure with nongovernmental entities to “fill the gap” between domestic government agencies who had no power to curtail speech, and federal intelligence agencies who were forbidden from curtailing domestic speech, in order to censor speech by surveilling, blacklisting, and silencing U.S. citizens, domestically, and thus allow government officials to violate the First Amendment without fear of being sued.

4. The Defendants in this case were architects of this infrastructure. The Defendants and their allies co-authored the foundational documents – The Playbooks – at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Defending Digital Democracy, testified to the US Senate Intelligence Committee to lobby for such an infrastructure, and forged relationships with billionaires, in particular Pierre Omidyar, through his Democracy Fund, as well as the Rockefeller Brothers, the Murdoch Family’s Quadrivium, Mark Zuckerberg, and other nongovernmental entities, to fund, design and deploy this centralized infrastructure for censorship of speech. The network diagram in Exhibit A provides a visual illustration of those relationships and the technology infrastructure they created to censor speech. These relationships provided the Defendants special access to channels to use if when and necessary for personal benefit, to not only blacklist and surveil US citizens, but also to silence their domestic speech, which is what they did to Dr. Shiva starting on September 25, 2020.

5. The existence of this infrastructure was discovered during the course of this lawsuit: On October 30, 2020, testimony elicited by this Court, revealed for the first time the existence of a “Trusted Twitter Partnership” between Government and Twitter; on May 19, 2021, Dr. Shiva discovered the “Playbooks” co-authored by the Defendants, which were presented to this Court during the May 20-21, 2021 hearings, that detail the step-by-step process for identifying Influence Operators (IOs), monitoring them and silencing their speech; and, on June 28, 2021, the staggering discovery of The Long Fuse Report, confirmed that this infrastructure had been monitoring Dr. Shiva starting as early as June of 2020. Discovery of The Long Fuse Report is as momentous in US History as discovery of the Pentagon Papers. This lawsuit provides the context to understand it.

6. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai (“Dr. Shiva”), MIT PhD, the inventor of email, is a scientist, technologist, political activist (see Exhibit B), and educator – an independent thinker -, a minority, who was born as a low-caste “Untouchable” in India’s deplorable caste system, earned four degrees from MIT, a Fulbright Scholar, Westinghouse Science Talents Honors Award recipient, Lemelson-MIT Awards Finalist, nominee for the Presidential National Medal of Technology and Innovation. His life has been about identifying problems and proposing solutions based on a systems science approach – that is neither partisan nor bi-partisan -, is beyond left and right, and is based on objectively understanding the interconnections of the parts of any system. He developed a systems science curriculum, which he originally taught at MIT, that he now teaches to the broad public to educate them on applying a systems approach to any problem. This approach is what Dr. Shiva employs in his videos and social media posts in analyzing a problem or situation.

7. Since 2011, Dr. Shiva worked hard to build his followers on Twitter – his main platform for education, outreach, and political activism – from 0 to 360,000 followers with a reach of tens to hundreds of millions as documented in The Long Fuse Report, before he was deplatformed by these Defendants on February 1, 2021. His content, combining text posts, images and video streams, enabled his students and followers on Twitter to get a deep and unique education, from a systems approach, on any number of issues be it innovation, healthcare, education, agriculture, vaccines, election integrity, Big Tech, etc. Given that Twitter is the most powerful megaphone for politics (politicians and political activists must be on Twitter to even have a chance of their message being heard), Dr. Shiva’s content, based on this systems-based approach, appealed to the broad mass of independent thinkers in America. Up until September 25, 2020, Dr. Shiva was never
suspended or deplatformed from Twitter, though he spoke on a number of controversial topics, from a non-mainstream, systems-science-based approach.

8. In February of 2017, Dr. Shiva decided to engage in electoral politics. He ran as an Independent for U.S. Senate from Massachusetts in 2018 against Elizabeth Warren. In 2020, he ran as a Republican (though the Massachusetts GOP did not support him, given he had his own independent base) in the U.S. Senate primary; and later, in the U.S. Senate general elections as a write in candidate on the platform of #StopElectionFraud and #TruthFreedomHealth.



10. On September 1, 2020, following the confounding results from his own U.S. Senate Primary election Dr. Shiva began his journey to discover two (2) systemic problems in the processes of U.S. electronic voting systems:
a. The certification by State Election Directors of voting systems software with features that allowed for the multiplication of a voter’s vote by a factor (the “weighted race” feature), thus denying one person one vote; and,
b. The lack of adherence to Federal law 52 USC 20701 that election officials must preserve digital ballot images for twenty-two (22) months for federal elections, to enable auditing.

11. During September 1-24, 2020, Dr. Shiva used Twitter to educate his nearly 260,000 students and followers, from a systems science approach, to appreciate the realities of these two systemic system problems that he had identified. He tweeted, shared posts, did videos on his own experience during his primary election campaign, the mechanics of the weighted race feature that denies one person one vote, how ballot images were being deleted – thus thwarting forensic audits, and the slogan of his U.S. Senate Write In campaign: #StopElectionFraud. The Long Fuse Report documents that at that time, the infrastructure co-architected by these Defendants was being only used to surveil him and actively analyze his ‘influence and reach’ to gauge his threat severity. During this period, Twitter never took any action to silence any of his tweets (see Exhibit C) or deplatform his tweets or his Twitter account.

13. On September 24, 2020, Dr. Shiva tweeted out about destruction of digital ballot images by Tassinari and Galvin, which went viral on social media. In response to this tweet, Defendant Galvin had his office respond with a press release disputing Dr. Shiva’s tweet. Galvin’s office also officially filed a complaint with Twitter through their dedicated Partner Support Portal (“PSP”). Galvin’s office is a “Trusted Twitter Partner,” which means any complaints from them receive a higher priority response than some normal private citizen complaining to Twitter. The Playbooks explain this in detail.

14. On September 25, 2020, Dr. Shiva posted a threaded tweet sharing four (4) screenshots of emails that explicitly named Defendant Michelle Tassinari, (“the September 25, 2020 Tassinari Tweet”). Tassinari holds many positions of power at the key intersection of governmental and non-governmental members of the infrastructure established to censor domestic speech:

a. State Election Director of Massachusetts;
b. Chief Legal Counsel for Massachusetts Secretary of State Galvin;
c. President of the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED);
d. Executive Committee Member of the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
Security Agency’s Election Infrastructure-Government Coordinating Council (CISA EI-GCC);
e. Member of the Advisory Board of the MIT Election Data & Science
Laboratory;
f. Member of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (US EAC); and,
g. Member of the Council of State Governments

15. The September 25, 2020 Tassinari Tweet went viral and revealed her personal role in destroying digital ballot images. This time, unlike the earlier official response, Tassinari had Amy Cohen, the Executive Director of NASED and someone who commanded immense influence through relationships that Cohen had forged over years in Washington DC, as shown in Exhibit A, to do ‘whatever it takes’ to get Dr. Shiva’s tweet removed.

16. Tassinari and Cohen’s coordination with Twitter and using the relationships they had forged, resulted in Dr. Shiva’s tweet being removed and Dr. Shiva being locked out of his Twitter account for most of the one month period leading to the general elections on November 3, 2020. Tassinari had used the relationships and the infrastructure to benefit her personally i.e. removing the tweet that revealed her violation of federal law. The deliberate silencing of Dr. Shiva on Twitter in the midst of his U.S. Senate campaign just prior to election day, severely crippled his last month of efforts including: raising money, reaching out to voters, sharing his message, etc.

17. On October 20, 2020, Dr. Shiva filed a lawsuit and sought to enjoin Galvin from further silencing him on Twitter. On October 30, 2020, this Court held a TRO hearing Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW
and elicited testimony which gave us the first glimpses of the infrastructure designed by the Defendants i.e. the “Trusted Twitter Partnership.” In her affidavit, Tassinari had concealed the Trusted Twitter Partnership and her use of the infrastructure through Amy Cohen to do ‘whatever it took’ to stop Dr. Shiva from spreading the news of Tassinari’s violation of federal law. This Court ruled in Dr. Shiva’s favor, ordered Galvin to stop contacting Twitter; Galvin to stop contacting NASED; and, ordering Galvin to respond to Dr. Shiva’s speech on Twitter with his own speech. At that hearing, this Court also indicated that it was more than likely that, per the Blum test, Dr. Shiva would prevail in his lawsuit in demonstrating that Twitter’s action was State Action.

18. Dr. Shiva would discover, later that Tassinari’s and Cohen’s influence and coercive power far outweighs that of the average state election director.

19. Starting on November 4, 2020, when Dr. Shiva was back on Twitter, until January 31, 2021, Dr. Shiva tweeted on all different topics. At this time his followers had grown to 360,000 and his influence and reach had also grown, as documented in The Long Fuse Report.

20. On February 1, 2021, when he once again shared the September 25, 2020 Tassinari Tweet in a video lecture about developments in this very lawsuit, to his students and followers, Dr. Shiva received, within seventeen(17) minutes of the lecture ending, an official Twitter email informing him that Twitter had permanently suspended his account. Those seventeen (17) minutes permitted no time for Twitter to exercise any independent private internal judgment; it kicked Dr. Shiva off Twitter because the other Defendants wanted it to do so. Interestingly, Tassinari, Cohen, and Twitter’s counsel Stacia Cardille (“Cardille”), who has submitted false affidavits in this case, were all together at NASED’sFebruary 1-5, 2021 Winter Conference at which Tassinari and Cohen had invited Cardille to give a talk on “Managing Misinformation on Social Media Platforms,” at the same time that Twitter deplatformed Dr. Shiva.

21. The Defendants, to conceal their coordinated efforts to silence Dr. Shiva, then coordinated together to conceal from this Court the existence of their relationship. Already in this case, multiple of the Defendants have made repeated omissions as well as direct factual misrepresentations via testimony and affidavit. Two of the more recent efforts to conceal the truth from this Court include:
a. Defendants failed to disclose to the Court the existence of the Playbooks setting out the means by which they were to regulate speech on social media and the fact that Twitter Legal, Tassinari and Cohen co-wrote them; and b. Cardille, on behalf of the Defendants, misrepresented that Twitter deplatformed Dr. Shiva through internal deliberations within Twitter. Cardille was confronted with the need to explain the 17-minute response time. This would have required her to reveal to this Court that 24/7 live surveillance teams were watching Dr. Shiva’s tweets on 4-hour shifts every day on behalf of the Defendants, as documented in the Long Fuse Report. Cardille chose to conceal this fact and filed a false affidavit instead.

22. The Long Fuse Report analyzed Dr. Shiva as the test subject, the canary in the coal mine, the first U.S. Senate candidate deplatformed during his election campaign, to see if the infrastructure works as designed, in order to next be employed against a sitting member of Congress (which is now underway as this lawsuit is being filed). In fact The Long Fuse Report, recommends in its closing chapters that political speech not be given preferential treatment – openly challenging the highest protection afforded by the First Amendment – and bringing the United States back in line with the British Commonwealth.

Dr. Shiva previously uncovered for the first time the existence of a “Trusted Twitter Partnership” between the Government and Twitter.

In his latest report, Dr. Shiva exposed the existence of The Long Fuse Report which is as momentous in US History as the discovery of the Pentagon Papers.

UPDATE– The hearing is tomorrow…
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/0 ... on-papers/

Hey @questauthority, Dr. Shiva, "Inventor of Email" has a Sanctions hearing Aug 4 at 2pm on 1:20-CV-11889 Ayyadurai v. Galvin. This is the failed MA Senate candidate who is suing MA Elections (& maybe Twitter). Order: (https://www.universalhub.com/files/ayya ... -order.pdf) Background: viewtopic.php?p=36258#p36258

Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
notorial dissent
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:36 pm

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#9

Post by notorial dissent »

This guy sounds like he has more than a few stripped gears. Every time I see one of those charts I start wondering who has the halodol right now. There was a tv show several years ago that used one of those to prove aliens existed and that they were coming for the human race, and they pastiched the chart together as part of the background, and it was glorious. And now every time I see one of those I wonder why the author isn't in a closed secure ward.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#10

Post by Luke »

You're right ND, he's a maniac. He's pushed bullsh*t all the way along... he and the vile DeAnna Lorraine, who did about as well as Orly Taitz in the California's 12th Congressional District election, 2020, always find the rankest gutter to swim in.

DeAnna.JPG
DeAnna.JPG (48.03 KiB) Viewed 3389 times

How a pair of anti-vaccine activists sparked a #FireFauci furor
After Trump gave the hashtag a retweet, the fringe, conspiracy-laden movement was ready with a replacement: “Dr. Shiva,” who pushes a variety of medically dubious claims.
By TINA NGUYEN 04/13/2020 09:56 PM EDT

When President Donald Trump retweeted a call to fire Dr. Anthony Fauci on Sunday night, he jolted a fringe conservative movement that viewed the boost as an acknowledgment of its cause.

And the #FireFauci gang was ready with a replacement: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai.

Ayyadurai, or “Dr. Shiva” as his fans call him, is a controversial scientist and long-shot Massachusetts Senate candidate who is pushing a variety of claims that range from dubious to medically disputed to outright false. He has argued that a strict vitamin regimen can prevent and treat the coronavirus — an unsubstantiated view at odds with the medical community and existing research. And he claims Fauci is a deep-state plant hellbent on “forced and mandatory vaccines” to support “Big Pharma” — a claim for which there is no evidence.

Yet Ayyadurai, who is not a medical doctor, has the imprimatur of several degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an online fan base among the people leading the movement to oust Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert. That includes DeAnna Lorraine, who suddenly ended up in the spotlight after Trump retweeted her call to #FireFauci. Lorraine, a former challenger for Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s California House seat who has regularly retweeted QAnon conspiracies, is using her newfound perch to stump for Ayyadurai.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/1 ... ror-185001


Of course, Jim Hoft features him all the time at the Gateway House of Boys.


Shiva GP.JPG
Shiva GP.JPG (100.7 KiB) Viewed 3389 times


The strange thing is that the tweet that kicked this whole case off, the lie that MA had destroyed ballots, wasn't even taken down by Twitter. So it's been hard to get why the judge wanted to take it this far, there was no remedy. Twitter ultimately threw him off the service for TOS violations, but it wasn't until way after the lawsuit.


He has a YouTube channel, he posted this tonight about his hearing tomorrow:

Dr. SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD
235K subscribers
Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Defendants NOW Demand SILENCING Dr.SHIVA's First Amendment Lawsuit. Hearing Tomorrow.

Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, the Inventor of Email, Scientist, Technologist, Educator shares the most recent developments on our historic First Amendment lawsuit. The truth is election officials and government actors have created an enterprise of relationships and infrastructure to surveil, blacklist and silence Americans who they disagree with.

Hearing is scheduled for tomorrow via Zoom.

The Defendants are now seeking to have the Court Silence/Seal the lawsuit itself, which is already in the public domain. They seek to conceal the infrastructure that they have created. You can get details at WinBackFreedom.com or get access to the key documents below. Everyone can give $1.00 to be part of our historic movement at WInBackFreedom.com.

The Lawsuit Complaint can be found here: https://u8z8g8c2.rocketcdn.me/wp-conten ... -small.pdf

The Network Diagram, a key Exhibit A, is here: https://u8z8g8c2.rocketcdn.me/wp-conten ... 2-2021.pdf

Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
notorial dissent
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:36 pm

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#11

Post by notorial dissent »

Well, his name certainly is appropriate, since it means "destroyer of worlds" and I'd say he's working it.
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5596
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#12

Post by northland10 »

notorial dissent wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:39 pm This guy sounds like he has more than a few stripped gears. Every time I see one of those charts I start wondering who has the halodol right now. There was a tv show several years ago that used one of those to prove aliens existed and that they were coming for the human race, and they pastiched the chart together as part of the background, and it was glorious. And now every time I see one of those I wonder why the author isn't in a closed secure ward.
Were you lurking here when the Flynn/Lindell chart was posted?

Image
101010 :towel:
Baidn
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:43 am

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#13

Post by Baidn »

What the hell am I seeing there?
"...don't teach a man to fish. He's a grown man and fishings not that hard." Ron Swanson the worlds only good libertarian
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5596
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#14

Post by northland10 »

Baidn wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:03 pm What the hell am I seeing there?
Various chapters of the DSM-5
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#15

Post by Luke »

Listened to the hearing with Judge Mark Wolf, it was nuts. Wolf doesn't seem to understand technology at all but he has a hard-on for trying to see if Shiva's 1A rights were violated by a "conspiracy" between MA and Twitter. Shiva does everything possible to torpedo his case, from firing his lawyers to disclosing Attorney/Client matters thereby waiving privilege. Felicia Elisworth, counsel from Twitter, was there and only spoke up about timing for the MTD (it'll be Friday the 13th). There was a whole lot of time spent on a lawyer from Charles Harder's firm who didn't show up... at one point Shiva's other lawyer said Ellis wrote the last brief, but Shiva says he did. Looks like they'll be getting all the emails to find out. Ellis never made an appearance and Wolf was pissed off the guy didn't show.

Anyway, the main thing is, having followed this since the beginning: All states have a dashboard to report Twitter users if they provide false information or threats. It's the same tool that users have, when you Report a Tweet, it's a form that you explain what's wrong. Twitter usually doesn't even acknowledge the submission until it takes action or not. So Wolf is missing the point. MA got no reply back from Twitter. Further, in this case, Twitter DID NOT EVEN TAKE THE REPORTED TWEET DOWN. So what lousy conspiracy would that be? It wasn't until months later after Shiva broke TOS over and over and over that they terminated his account. MA said that after the first report, they never reported him again; Wolf even sort of acknowledged that the whole thing could be moot.

Wolf is working off Ex parte Young and trying to make Twitter a State Actor. (That's why Gateway Pundit keeps being confused about Section 230, but that's Twitter's 1A defense, so as always, Jim Hoft is a clown).
Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the constitution.
Another issue that Twitter filed was that Shiva agreed to TOS which requires California. But Wolf spoke a bit about how if Twitter wasn't subject to his court, and MA wasn't subject to CA court, would the Plaintiff "not have his day in court".

MA is mad that their folks have been dragged through the mud and harassed and threatened for months... Shiva is suing them for money damages personally. Wolf made it clear all that is about to be dismissed. He told Shiva's lawyer to file an amended complaint with ONLY the 1A/11A claim (it's #6) without the "distracting" claims. He said he's dismissing the personal claims against the state defendants.

So Shiva's new lawyer (who was a deer in the headlights, stuttering, unsure, certainly not worth the $475/hr he said Shiva is paying him) needs to file the new Amended Complaint in the next few days. Wolf is going to let him wait on the Memorandum of Law until the MTDs are filed (but warned him to be ready by then with it). Sounds like everything else is going to be dismissed. Still hard to understand why Wolf is so eager to keep this going, but seems like he is. Unfortunately, that just keeps giving Shiva more of a platform to lie and harass (which Wolf probably never sees since he seems like a Luddite).

It was an interesting hearing and fun when Wolf actually yelled at Shiva. Will update if I think of anything else, or when the transcript comes out. Only following it because it's an interesting concept of how government and social media companies could possibly violate people's 1A rights.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#16

Post by Luke »

Lots of comments under the article too also.
Losing Senate candidate who once dreamed of collecting hundreds of millions from state officials in election lawsuit now faces tens of thousands in fines for disobeying court rules
By adamg on Wed, 08/04/2021 - 11:45pm

A federal judge today formally dismissed most of repeat Senate loser Shiva Ayyadurai's increasingly conspiracy-drenched lawsuit against state elections officials and a national association of election officers, but kept alive what the judge considers the most interesting legal question of the suit: Whether Twitter colluded with those officials to permanently ban him from the platform, in possible violation of his First Amendment rights. In a sometimes hostile hearing in which US District Court Judge Mark Wolf twice ordered Ayyadurai to shut up - once while pointing his index finger at the self described genius over the Zoom connection - the judge said he was dismissing the parts of Ayyadurai's suit that claimed the officials were guilty of RICO violations and that they owed him millions of dollars in damage. Wolf ruled the officials, including Secretary of State Bill Galvin, are protected from monetary demands by the legal concept of "qualified immunity." Ayyadurai initially sought more than $1 billion.

Instead, Wolf ordered Ayyadurai's lawyer to file a possible revised law suit focusing only on the First Amendment issue and the question of whether Twitter became a "state actor" by banning him - even if it was months after the state filed a single complaint about one of his tweets. Twitter has said it will fight any attempt to join it to the case, that it has its own First Amendment rights to decide what to allow on its platform - in this case to not allow right-wing conspiracists free rein to promote their theories after Jan. 6. At the same time, Wolf raised the question of perjury and the Fifth Amendment to discuss what he considered possible wrong-doing by Ayyadurai, now on his third lawyer on the case, which he has also frequently handled by himself. Ayyadurai at first claimed the Secretary of State's office stole last September's Republican nomination for Senate from him; he now claims Bill Galvin, other election officials here and in other states, Twitter, Mark Zuckerberg, various professors at Harvard, MIT and Stanford, Associated Press and a Rockefeller family foundation are conspiring not just to destroy him but to eliminate all Americans' rights to free speech, using software imported from the United Kingdom.

Attorneys for the state and the national association called on Wolf to just toss the case entirely, saying the nonsense has gone on long enough and that their clients keep getting threats - some of which they've referred to the FBI - by Ayyadurai's riled up fan base. The judge told the lawyers to file proof of such harassment by Friday. In July, Wolf was only considering possible fines and sanctions - which could include dismissal - for the way Ayyadurai fired his second lawyer two days before key motions were due to be filed, even though that would force yet another delay in the case. Wolf said nobody has the right to force a delay like that. But today, Wolf demanded an answer to another question: Whether Ayyadurai wrote a detailed legal memorandum on a proposed new complaint, submitted July 22, by himself or whether yet another lawyer, based in California at the law firm that represented him in a lawsuit over whether he really invented e-mail wrote all or part of it. Lawyers who have not told a judge they are representing a client are not allowed to do that; nor are people represented by a lawyer, as Ayyadurai was that day, allowed to file court documents like that.

Even aside from the fact that the font on the document was different from the one Ayyadurai had used over several months of earlier self-filed documents, Wolf said it just didn't read like any of Ayyadurai's previous and often lengthy filings. "This one stood out because it seemed to be written in a much more lawyer-like way than anything you've submitted to me before and since," he told Ayyadurai. Also, his current lawyer, Timothy Cornell, filed a document saying he didn't sign the memorandum because it was written by the California lawyer. Ayyadurai said he changed the font at Cornell's suggestion to be more professional. He insisted he wrote the whole thing himself, only reading it out loud as he did so that other people in his office could offer suggestions. And while the California lawyer, Dilan Esper, also made suggestions, Ayyadurai said he didn't use any of them; they came in too late. Ayyadurai explained the change in writing style by saying he is simply a good learner, in this case to be more professional in his writing. "I am not in stasis," he said. "Maybe I'll also go to Harvard Law School and become a lawyer one day." Both he and Cornell said Cornell's assertion about who wrote the document was wrong, that Cornell had simply made a mistake.

Wolf ordered Cornell to explain in writing why Wolf shouldn't charge Ayyadurai at least $20,250 in fines for the way he fired his second lawyer two days before key motions were due to be filed, even though that would force yet another delay in the case. The money represents the number of hours defense lawyers have spent on the case dealing with the aftermath of Ayyadurai's decision to fire one lawyer and hire another - a total of 45 as of last night - times $450, the hourly rate Cornell said he is charging his client. Wolf also said he will order the California lawyer to appear before him to answer the question of whether he had anything to do with the filing. Wolf had ordered Esper to appear today, but he refused, saying he was not a lawyer on the case and anything he told Ayyadurai would be protected by attorney/client privilege. Wolf said Ayyadurai waived that right in a closed-door hearing before the public one, and that Esper will be called before him not as a lawyer but as "a material witness" - one who could face a contempt citation if he tries to not appear again. "I am not pleased with Mr. Esper's failure to appear at all," he said. "I think there's a good chance we'll meet Mr. Esper."
***
Twitter didn't respond to the complaint and did not delete Ayyadurai's tweet, but temporarily banned him for similar tweets and then, after the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, banned him permanently. Wolf says this raises the issue of whether Twitter became a "state actor" in doing Galvin's bidding - a claim that Ayyadurai has expanded over the past several months to come up with his global conspiracy theory. Wolf said that if he does decide to let the narrowed case continue, he's going to keep Ayyadurai on a short leash - even to the point of threatening criminal contempt charges against him, which could mean jail time. "What's past is not prologue," he said. When Ayyadurai began to recite his entire conspiracy theory, in answer to the question of how he came to fire his second lawyer, Wolf cut him off. "OK, stop," he said, just as Ayyadurai was about to explain how his parents came here from India to escape tyranny. "Do you hear me?" the judge asked. Ayyadurai stopped. Later in the hearing, Wolf and Ayyadurai bickered over whether the plaintiff should hand over as evidence the e-mail messages that might have incorrectly led his current lawyer to believe that Esper had written the legal filing at the heart of the potential-fines question. Wolf cut him off again. "You want to litigate the Eleventh Amendment issue," he said, beginning to jab his finger at Ayyadurai through his screen. "Now I'm going to explain to you one more time what you need to to to try to do that so listen!" Wolf ordered all the filings, including the new more limited complaint to be filed well before hearings he scheduled to start Aug. 25.
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/losin ... ce-dreamed
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
tek
Posts: 2250
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:15 am

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#17

Post by tek »

it is a sad comment that this guy has a "fan base"
Uninformed
Posts: 2095
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#18

Post by Uninformed »

If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#19

Post by Luke »

Image


Thanks for the heads up. Checked if it was just the state defendents he was trying to collect from personally, but nope, the whole mess. No YT videos on his channel for a week which is rare for Shiva.

Judge Wolf had really lost patience with him, shows how stupid Shiva is. Wolf wanted to see the state actor claim play out and was even going to pay for an expert lawyer. But Shiva had his head too far up his a** screaming conspiracy theories and other things that would have gotten this dismissed long ago. Now he can put his head back there all the time, his Twitter ban is permanent.

After all that time and money. Must have been the money fines. In the last article, a commenter mentioned:
Broken down like his bus
By Jess Idres on Thu, 08/05/2021 - 12:44am.

(Seriously, Shiva's bus has been sitting on and off for several months at an autobody shop in Medford on my route to work; guess he needs that sweet twitter money to fix it properly)

The more and more I read his arguments, the more I suspect this guy has a serious social-emotional disorder, like ODD or a Social Communication disorder; where those with it assume they're right on everything, and even with more and more evidence otherwise, begin to shut down and believe in bigger and bigger conspiracies that don't make sense, because it's easier to believe than them making a mistake or not being right in the first place. His sister in an interview years ago suggested that her brother is very smart, but is easily influenced by others contradicting him.

I keep wondering where he gets his money for all these failed political runs and lawsuits; yeah, for a while after the Gawker downfall, every news site caved and paid him to go away after a writer would try to debunk him, but that money can't have lasted that long. So who's got him bankrolled? Fellow tech assholes, like Thiel? Koch heads? MAGA hats? And how long before they get sick of him and let him just dance for middle fingers on the Fellsway?
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/losin ... ce-dreamed
Losing Senate candidate says: Oops, never mind; drops lawsuit over election results, his Twitter account
By adamg on Tue, 08/10/2021 - 10:32pm

Repeat Senate loser Shiva Ayyadurai tonight dropped his lawsuit against the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office, just one day after he'd filed a new complaint alleging that that office and Twitter were part of a ruthless global conspiracy out to destroy him and deprive all Americans of their free-speech rights.

In a filing in US District Court through his latest attorney, Ayyadurai averred:

NOTICE IS GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai now hereby voluntarily dismisses with prejudice all claims in this suit. In addition, all parties voluntarily withdraw all pending motions in this matter. There is no further action by any party on this matter, no questions in controversy remain among the parties, and each party will bear its own costs and fees.

The move, which still needs to be approved by US District Court Judge Mark Wolf, comes as Wolf was considering tens of thousands of dollars in fines against Ayyadurai for violating court rules - by delaying key court dates and possibly by having a "shadow" counsel write a key legal memorandum - and as Ayyadurai was seeking to formally have Twitter added as a defendant in the case.

Technically, Ayyadurai still has a second lawsuit pending against Secretary of State Bill Galvin, calling for a hand count of all the ballots in the Republican Senate primary last September, but no action has occurred in that case for several months.

Dropping the case could free up some of Ayyadurai's time to work on a potential 2020 statewide ballot question which, if approved by the state Attorney General's office and if he can get enough valid signatures, would ask voters to remove Galvin from any oversight of voting machines and would require the state to use a complex system of safeguards - including ballots printed with holographic foils, watermarks, "multi-colored micro-numismatic invisible ultraviolet designs" and other measures to prevent counterfeiting - and which would require all ballots be counted by hand and copies of all ballots be digitally photographed and then placed on a server where anybody could look at them.

In both his suits against Galvin's office, a central issue were tweets by Ayyadurai - until Twitter deplatformed him in February - in which he alleged Galvin destroyed one million electronic ballots in the Republican primary. Galvin's office repeatedly countered there were no such electronic ballots to begin with, that paper ballots, stored in secured warehouses, were the only ballots used in the Massachusetts.
https://www.universalhub.com/2021/losin ... mind-drops



Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 5830
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#20

Post by Suranis »

I think Judge Wolf was right to narrow the Lawsuit to the first Amendment part of the suit as that is a genuinely interesting part of the lawsuit and is probably something that needs to be argued over.

It seems that was the least interesting part of the suit for our hero, however,
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 17654
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#21

Post by raison de arizona »

Shiva is telling people how to manage their money and running for President. If anyone wondered what he was up to.
Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email @va_shiva wrote: Dr.SHIVA TOWN HALL: Economy - Manage Your Money & Prosper - http://Shiva4Presdent.com
V.A. SHIVA
Dr.SHIVA TOWN HALL: Economy - Manage Your Money & Prosper - Shiva4Presdent.com

shiva4president.com
Dr.SHIVA For President 2024 | Be the Light!
Grow The Movement To Ignite A Systems Revolution!
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5382
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#22

Post by bob »

raison de arizona wrote: Thu May 25, 2023 11:20 pm Shiva is telling people how to manage their money and running for President. If anyone wondered what he was up to.
:fingerwag: : Ahem.

Nb.:

Where are the Three Remaining Birthers when you need them? Only one has answered the call:


But he has a plan!:

Which the courts already have rejected!
Image ImageImage
User avatar
tek
Posts: 2250
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:15 am

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#23

Post by tek »

Me! Me! Me!

Hey Doc: Put on your big-boy pants and run as a Republican.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#24

Post by Luke »

Where the heck is Sharon Rondeau and "DeMaio" on this? This story is worth 5,000 words at least, maybe even a multi-part series. Sharon has been a fan of Shiva's, I'm pretty sure she covered him during the CyberNinjas audit. She is missing a grand opportunity to gin up the Three Remaining Birthers.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5382
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai Fake "Inventor of Email" / Anti-Vaxxer / Election Truther / Failed Candidate

#25

Post by bob »

orlylicious wrote: Fri May 26, 2023 9:31 am Where the heck is Sharon Rondeau and "DeMaio" on this? This story is worth 5,000 words at least, maybe even a multi-part series. Sharon has been a fan of Shiva's, I'm pretty sure she covered him during the CyberNinjas audit. She is missing a grand opportunity to gin up the Three Remaining Birthers.
I'll try to work it into a comment at the P&E.

Meanwhile, this smells-like-a-sock-pocket account is like a birther, but in reverse. Not an anti-birther: an "abirther"; "unbirther"; "no-birther"? I'm still workshopping it.


Very confident, and very wrong. So wrong, I find myself in agreement with a birther. :faint:
Image ImageImage
Post Reply

Return to “Other weirdos”