Re: The Many Conspiracies Of Kerry Swift-Boater Jerome Corsi
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 3:39 pm
Corsi needs to sue himself, what with all the damagthe does Everytime he opens his trap.
Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.
Perfect. Larry will get his ass kicked, and Randazza is such a flaming asshole that I won't feel bad about all the times Klayman's antics will drive his blood pressure through the roof during the proceedings.
why won't the coward do it now?bob wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 3:09 pmThe Hill: Former Stone associates indicate willingness to testify against him:Klayman, meanwhile, said Corsi may pursue a lawsuit against Stone and Infowars founder Alex Jones if "they defame us again."
Stone and Jones went after Corsi in the lead-up to a Washington Post story published this week about payments Corsi received from Infowars, after he stepped down as Washington bureau chief for Infowars.
CNN: Corsi willing to 'affirm' that information about him in Stone indictment is accurate:Jerome Corsi, a conservative author and conspiracy theorist, said Sunday that he would be happy to testify against Roger Stone and let his testimony about what occurred during the 2016 presidential election and whether anyone coordinated with WikiLeaks' efforts to undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign "speak for itself."
"I will be happy to testify if — I would suspect to be subpoenaed," Corsi told CNN host Jake Tapper on "State of the Union." "And I will let the testimony fall wherever it falls. I'm going to tell the truth, to the best of my ability."
Jerome Corsi, a longtime friend and associate of Roger Stone, said Sunday that the information about him in the indictment against Stone is "accurate" and that he will "affirm that if asked to in court."
* * *
"I'm going to tell the truth, to the best of my ability. Even that's hard, given the amount of information and the fact that I have said from the beginning I'm not a human tape recorder. You can't push a button, and I can't recall precisely, in detail, granularly, conversations, emails, events from 2016," Corsi said.
"But I'm going to do my best to tell the truth, without calculation of whom it benefits or whom it detracts," he added.
When asked by Tapper if he knew which senior campaign official was directed to talk to Stone to find out about additional Wikileaks releases, as mentioned in the indictment, Corsi said he didn't know and that he only went off what Stone had told him.
"I do agree that Roger wanted me to find out from Wikileaks," he said. "I never had any contact with Julian Assange directly or indirectly, so my communications with Roger in July and August 2016 about what I thought Assange had were really speculation on my part connecting the dots."
What Foogy said. The problem I have is believing ANYTHING that Corsi says, I'm just not sure he is capable of telling the truth. Now he does howsumever strike me as the type who would have things squirreled away that could prove real damning for ANYONE he actually had dealings with though. A rat is a rat is a rat.
Notorial Dissent wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 5:02 pmMaybe the light of reason has finally dawned on Corsi, but ehhh I doubt it. Now self preservation maybe yeah if he really sees a prison sentence hanging over his head he might have wised up, but otherwise, a rat is a rat is a rat. The bit I have problems with is that "best of his ability" part. Corsi is and has been a serial and compulsive liar.
Totally agree. They are all ethically and morally challenged to an incredible degree, and saying they have credibility problems is kind of like saying water is wet. Now the one thing I can think of is that they jointly and severally are so egotistical and full of hubris that I would be willing to bet they have left more than enough incriminating evidence against themselves and their fellow travelers that they will have done a great deal of the Special Prosecutor's job for him. They quite simply NEVER thought they'd get caught and that if they did that Individual 1 would pardon them out of hand.Gregg wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 7:49 pmI don't think it would be worth the time to get any of them to flip because all of them are such admitted and consistent liars that nothing they say could ever be accepted into evidence. If Corsi said it was dark outside at midnight I wouldn't believe him until I could look out the window. If Stone said it, I'd have to have the window open because I wouldn't trust the glass.
Exclusive: Larry Klayman predicts client Jerry Corsi will not face Mueller charges
Last Friday morning, for one of the few times in years, I got up late, at 7:30 am Eastern, as I was a bit tired after traveling from the West Coast to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday to prep one of my clients who had been subpoenaed before Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s grand jury.
On Thursday, as I appeared at the federal courthouse and took the elevator to the fourth floor, which is where the grand jury room is located, I was escorted into a small waiting room. Shortly after I situated myself, one of the special counsel’s primary prosecutors, Aaron Zelinsky, appeared with a special FBI agent. Reaching out to shake hands, Zelinsky looked tense if not intense. Staring darkly into my eyes, he quickly pulled away as he and the agent escorted my client into the grand jury room to greet 22 jurors and Andrew Goldstein, a fellow prosecutor.
My client’s grand jury interrogation was short, less than an hour – much shorter than the tens of hours Jerry Corsi had been forced to endure. My client testified truthfully, and he told me that Zelinsky, who had done the questioning, looked satisfied with his openness and candor. Lawyers are not permitted into federal grand jury rooms. Instead they must wait outside, and if their client needs legal advice, he or she is free to exit and consult with them.
The indictment of Roger Stone, which I learned about when I awoke at 7:30 a.m. the following day, indeed served to confirm that Jerry, like my client Thursday, had been open and honest with the special counsel. Nothing in this indictment in any way accuses him of any falsehood much less illegality, and given Mueller and his prosecutors’ demonstrated proclivity to use speaking indictments to communicate with the public, this is more than noteworthy. (A copy of the Stone indictment can be found at www.larryklayman.com). It thus would appear that my brave client stands a good chance of not being indicted. If it were the case, the special counsel certainly could have handed down two grand jury indictments the same day.
The special counsel hopefully also knows by now that Jerry Corsi and I will not roll over! In the past weeks, we have filed criminal complaints with the U.S. Department of Justice and an ethics complaint with the District of Columbia Office of Disciplinary Counsel, as well as a civil lawsuit, for gross prosecutorial abuse and other illegalities. In this regard, Mueller’s team had threatened Jerry with being put away for the rest of his life – he is 72 years old – if he would not sign a plea agreement finding him guilty of one count of perjury, but with no recommended prison time. The reason for this so-called “sweetheart” plea deal? Jerry was made to believe and he understood that he, in exchange, would have to lie under oath in order to perhaps implicate the president in wrongdoing. This my principled client could not accept. As a religious man, Jerry would also not perjure himself before God.
Nor would he be tarred as a felon who lied, particularly since he is a New York Times best-selling author. To plead guilty to lying would destroy his credibility and thus his career and livelihood. How could readers then believe what he writes?
And despite Jerry having been cheaply branded by the left as a “birther” and conservative “conspiracy theorist” – I too have been unfairly attacked in this regard – he has never been proven wrong in his hard-hitting investigative journalism. Even with regard to Obama’s birth certificate, he was right on the money. It has been confirmed by forensic experts to be totally fraudulent, regardless of where the former president was actually born.
It would therefore appear that Jerry may be out of the woods. However, neither he nor I can take anything for granted and thus must continue to pursue our complaints and lawsuits against Mueller.
* * *
Jerry does not wish Roger any harm – and it is not true, as some reporters published Monday, that he is “happy to testify” against Stone – but Roger by allegedly not telling the truth under oath and threatening Credico, all of which Mueller will seek to prove with existing documentary evidence and congressional transcripts, has apparently dug himself a perilous ditch, however unfairly it may be that he as a pro-Trump partisan is prosecuted while leftist and Democratic partisans walk off scot-free. The good news is, however, that a reading of the Stone indictment effectively exonerates my client Dr. Jerome Corsi.
I know of someone who would probably disagree...bob wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:10 pmWND: Roger Stone indictment: 'Tale of 2 Targets':Exclusive: Larry Klayman predicts client Jerry Corsi will not face Mueller charges
And despite Jerry having been cheaply branded by the left as a “birther” and conservative “conspiracy theorist” – I too have been unfairly attacked in this regard – he has never been proven wrong in his hard-hitting investigative journalism.
Klayman going to use this claim that he "all but" (and "will") sue Fairbanks.Corsi's complaint wrote:Defendant Stone has also used and continues to employ surrogates, either out in the open or secretly, to defame Plaintiff Corsi, such as his “friend” Michael Caputo, Alex Jones and J. Owen Stroyer of InfoWars, Cassandra Fairbanks, and reporter Chuck Ross of The Daily Caller, to name just a few.
That is just precious. I assume KKKlayman is his attorney. That'll end well-NOT.GreatGrey wrote: ↑Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:04 pmWel now.. Corsi sues Stone.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/docume ... plaint.pdf