Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#601

Post by bob » Wed May 15, 2019 12:17 pm

P&E: Reader Contacts US Attorney John Durham about Obama’s Eligibility:
HOW DEEP WILL THE INVESTIGATION GO?

In the early-morning hours Wednesday, New York State resident Robert Laity completed a “Citizen’s Complaint” form located on the website of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut headed by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was announced on Monday as having been selected to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia “collusion” investigation which ended in a paucity of evidence supporting the FBI’s original allegation.

* * *

Laity’s complaint centered on his allegation that Barack Hussein Obama was never eligible for the presidency due to his failure to meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

* * *

In an email accompanying his formal submission to Durham, Laity wrote, “Please see attached complaint against Barack Obama and include this information in your current investigation into the propriety and Predication of the Mueller Investigation.”

* * *

Along with the complaint form, Laity included an April 17, 2017 letter he wrote to President Trump regarding his belief that Obama “entered the Office of the President of the United States, by fraudulent means and without legal bona-fides during time of war” which Laity said “makes Barack Obama a spy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.”

The day after Barr was confirmed, Laity contacted Barr by letter in which he stated, “I trust that you will investigate this matter. I await your response. FYI, I placed Barack Obama under formal citizen’s arrest with service upon Eric Holder, circa 2012. I believe this matter is of national security import. I trust that you will treat this matter with the utmost of seriousness. Your predecessors apparently did not do so.”

The Barr letter was included in Laity’s submission to Durham’s office, as was a copy of Laity’s publication, “Imposters in the Oval Office” published in August of last year.

[Usual birther :yankyank: snipped.]
Laity's thrown paper complaint.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#602

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Wed May 15, 2019 12:27 pm

So now John Durham has two useless investigations on his plate. My sympathies.

Which one will get a FOAD reply?

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#603

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed May 15, 2019 12:38 pm

Laity is a polymath legal and historical ignoramus and all around general fool. In other news dogs bark.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#604

Post by Orlylicious » Wed May 15, 2019 1:31 pm

Thank you Bob! And ND, you are a treasure, you crack me up every time... "in other news dogs bark" is exactly it.

Wonder why Rharon, a CT resident, didn't do this? Maybe because it could trigger an investigation into HER since Durham is in her district? Come on Sharon, poke the bear baby!
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#605

Post by bob » Wed May 15, 2019 2:26 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 1:31 pm
Wonder why Rharon, a CT resident, didn't do this?
But a journalist never makes the news! Just reports on it. :roll:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#606

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed May 15, 2019 2:44 pm

bob wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 2:26 pm
Orlylicious wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 1:31 pm
Wonder why Rharon, a CT resident, didn't do this?
But a journalist never makes the news! Just reports on it. :roll:
Yeah....right...... :rotflmao:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#607

Post by bob » Wed May 15, 2019 9:21 pm

Because Kerchner was feeling left out of Laity's Parade of Idiocy:


Yes: The entirety of Connecticut is now a birther nexus. :brickwallsmall:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#608

Post by Orlylicious » Fri May 17, 2019 1:24 am

of course Miki Booth retweeted the bull*hit below, there's no depth she'll sink to :lol:

Ron's comment is adorable, he blasts it to the dwindling citizens of the tiny republic of Birfastan. Sorry Ron, you've been duped (like Terry Trussell who died in prison, don't be next). With Laity, it was the opposite, it's seriously projection and ironic to say he was banned for "Telling The TRUTH???" Not in the reality based world, everybody knows these are all lies and Laity was suspended for hateful, harassing content against the rules.

Hey Ron, why didn't you copy Twitter or Twitter Security on that tweet? Maybe because you'll get banned too also? 8-) :lol:
Ron Teidel @im2byteme
Robert C Laity Suspended From Twitter Surfaces! Anyone Else Want To Know Why He Was Suspended? Telling The TRUTH??? @realDonaldTrump @Patriotress @BillPeriman @blove65 @MikiBooth @cdrkirchner @Pudingtane @birtherbyfacts @KenyanBornObama #1POdNamVet
Laity.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#609

Post by bob » Fri May 17, 2019 1:23 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Fri May 17, 2019 1:24 am
Ron's comment is adorable, he blasts it to the dwindling citizens of the tiny republic of Birfastan.
The irony: I can't see Ron's whines about Laity being "silenced" because ... Ron baned me. :crying:

* * *

P&E comments:
Johnathan O'Reilly wrote:Mr. Laity, please take great care. The Obamas, th ed Clinton’s, and their evil freak show of toadies and enablers think NOTHING about killing or destroying the lives of true Patriots like you and their loved ones. Of COURSE Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t born in America, but his color and his radical politics gave him a Teflon coating. A former Missouri senator even confided to a small group of us that both Democrats and Republicans knew he was illegitimate and unqualified, but were too fearful for their lives and their loved ones to speak out. Obama himself has even referred to his ‘Muslim faith’ in at least two interviews. His candidacy and treason was aided and abetted by John Brennan and other ‘higher ups’ in the intelligence community. I certainly hope Mr. Durham has the courage to assist you with this.
Laity wrote:Jonathan O’Reilly, Thank you for your expression of concern for my welfare. I have been threatened in the past for my views on this issue. But that must not deter me. Interesting to note is that in consultation with my Lawyer today, we discussed this issue. He has read my book “imposters in the oval office”. It is noteworthy to mention that the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut has a procedure for accepting Citizen Complaints while the U.S. Attorney in the Western District of NY actually told me not “to contact him again.” I asked my lawyer why one office has a system wherein citizens can file information while another district’s U.S. Attorney’s office does not. The FBI once told me that they “don’t take complaints.” NY is a deep blue State. It is atrocious. I have filed multiple documents with everyone from President Trump on down to my area congressmen. Obama’s crimes cannot be ignored forever. Something has to give soon.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#610

Post by Orlylicious » Fri May 17, 2019 2:36 pm

Hey Laity!
Something has to give soon.
Here's our guess about what's going to give ... We have a place all picked out for you on the #DeadBirthers topic, it's perfect for you.* :stamp:




* NADT
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34769
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#611

Post by realist » Fri May 17, 2019 2:46 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Fri May 17, 2019 2:36 pm
Hey Laity!
Something has to give soon.
Here's our guess about what's going to give ... We have a place all picked out for you on the #DeadBirthers topic, it's perfect for you.* :stamp:




* NADT
:rotflmao:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#612

Post by bob » Sat May 18, 2019 12:43 pm

P&E comments:
Laity wrote:I have over four decades of experience representing clients in the Federal Sector as a NON-Lawyer Statutory Appeals Specialist. I started as a Union Steward and was elected as a Union Officer later on. I practice before such forums as the EEOC, MSPB, inter alia. I started representing myself pro se, as I still do. Then I took a paralegal course. I followed up with an online course called “How to Win in Court” (Jurisdictionary) taught by the American Justice Foundation. After successful completion one is granted an honorary Juris Doctorate., J.D., honoris causis.

These are all fine ways of “getting one’s feet wet” in the pool of Law. Law is a wonderful area in which to help others as well as oneself. It has given me many years of satisfaction to know that I have helped others get the Justice and recompense they so rightly deserved.
OPOVV wrote:At one point in my life I decided to become a lawyer, so I went to law school. After a time, I changed majors from dreams of Perry Mason moments to digging tells in the Middle East. Why?
Because I wasn’t able to separate the difference between “the law” and “right and wrong”; in other words, I had a conscience attained from watching “Hopalong Cassidy” and, no doubt, at least in part, Sunday school, where I learned “an eye for an eye”; “if a contractor builds a house for a client and if that house collapses and kills the son of the client, then the contractor’s son will be put to death”.
And then there’s the definition of “reasonableness”.
But, then again, that’s me.
But I never could jump the chasm – in my mind – between the difference between what is right (in my mind – what I believe) and what is wrong (again, in my mind of what I believe) and the law’s interpretation of right and wrong: I have remained an ignorant novice (we have laws that state we are to deport illegal immigrants yet there’s, what, more than 20 million of them within our borders? But it’s more than just enforcement; it goes a heck of a lot deeper, doesn’t it?).
I believe, wholeheartedly, that child molesters should be executed and thieves should be forced to make restitution.
Unfortunately, we need lawyers to handle disputes between us “not examined” humans; “to err is human” sort of reality, but I’m not one of them. Some are and all the power to them, but it’s a job I’ll leave to others.
To decide to become a lawyer would be what I would call a “Jesus Moment”: God would ask me to serve and I’d have to decline: sorry, I’m not your guy for I’d lay waste to all who would do me harm: I’d have turned Jerusalem into another Sodom and Gomorra.
But, then again, that’s just me.
I’m not saying anything bad about the profession, but in early America, there were two professions not allowed to be in the town’s limits after dark: lawyers and actors.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#613

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat May 18, 2019 2:01 pm

Either I haven't had enough coffee yet, or that doesn't any sense at all, even less than usual for Laity and fellow fools, or both.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Mr. Gneiss
Posts: 1777
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:37 am

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#614

Post by Mr. Gneiss » Sat May 18, 2019 6:18 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 2:01 pm
Either I haven't had enough coffee yet, or that doesn't any sense at all, even less than usual for Laity and fellow fools, or both.
FIFY, but it still doesn't make any sense at all.

For newbies, OPOVV is One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet
OPOVV wrote:At one point in my life I decided to become a lawyer, so I went to Taft law school. After a time, I changed majors from dreams of Perry Mason moments to digging tells wells in the Middle East.

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 12009
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#615

Post by Whatever4 » Sat May 18, 2019 10:31 pm

Mr. Gneiss wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 6:18 pm

For newbies, OPOVV is One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet
OPOVV wrote:At one point in my life I decided to become a lawyer, so I went to Taft law school. After a time, I changed majors from dreams of Perry Mason moments to digging tells wells in the Middle East.
:rotflmao: I didn’t THINK he was an archaeologist, so that really confused me.
"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#616

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat May 18, 2019 11:17 pm

Mr. Gneiss wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 6:18 pm
Notorial Dissent wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 2:01 pm
Either I haven't had enough coffee yet, or that doesn't any sense at all, even less than usual for Laity and fellow fools, or both.
FIFY, but it still doesn't make any sense at all.

For newbies, OPOVV is One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet
OPOVV wrote:At one point in my life I decided to become a lawyer, so I went to Taft law school. After a time, I changed majors from dreams of Perry Mason moments to digging tells wells in the Middle East.
So it isn't just me then. Some mornings I 'm not too sure. Laity does seem to attract the effected delusional.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#617

Post by Orlylicious » Sun May 19, 2019 5:45 am

And as Northland pointed out in the nicest possible way in 2017...
He is Tom MacLeran who was one of the plaintiffs in Orly's Mississippi ballot challenge case. He is famous for writing a letter to Judge Wingate explaining that he could not travel to attend a hearing ...
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15615
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#618

Post by ZekeB » Sun May 19, 2019 6:31 am

Orlylicious wrote:
Sun May 19, 2019 5:45 am
And as Northland pointed out in the nicest possible way in 2017...
He is Tom MacLeran who was one of the plaintiffs in Orly's Mississippi ballot challenge case. He is famous for writing a letter to Judge Wingate explaining that he could not travel to attend a hearing ...
Was he the one who had a chronic case of the trots? Reality started getting too real for those "witnesses" who were living with fantasies.
Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 28210
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#619

Post by Foggy » Sun May 19, 2019 6:43 am

ZekeB wrote:
Sun May 19, 2019 6:31 am
Was he the one who had a chronic case of the trots?
Yes.

The judge was going to call these idiots on the carpet about the daffydavits they had signed, so he ordered them to appear in court to answer questions. But McLeran wrote a letter saying he couldn't leave home because he needed access to his precious potty, 24/7.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8054
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#620

Post by Northland10 » Sun May 19, 2019 7:14 am

Foggy wrote:
Sun May 19, 2019 6:43 am
ZekeB wrote:
Sun May 19, 2019 6:31 am
Was he the one who had a chronic case of the trots?
Yes.

The judge was going to call these idiots on the carpet about the daffydavits they had signed, so he ordered them to appear in court to answer questions. But McLeran wrote a letter saying he couldn't leave home because he needed access to his precious potty, 24/7.
He's not all bad. Unlike Orly, he chose not to dump his crap in court.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#621

Post by bob » Sun May 19, 2019 8:28 am

P&E Mike Shoesmith on “Freedom Friday” — Will Ted Cruz Run for President in 2024?:
AND IS HE ELIGIBLE?

On the May 17 edition of “Freedom Friday” guest-hosted by Nick Stewart in Carl Gallups’s absence, executive editor and frequent guest Mike Shoesmith quoted from The Post & Email's May 8 article on the alleged “natural born Citizenship” of British-born “Baby Sussex,” now known as Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor.

* * *

After reading from the opening paragraphs of the article relating an exchange that morning on “Fox & Friends” between co-hosts Steve Doocy and Ainsley Earhardt, Shoesmith, who is Canadian, shared his theory as to why Doocy might have promoted “Baby Sussex” as eligible to the U.S. presidency: to promote Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, also Canadian-born, as eligible to be U.S. president for a possible 2024 presidential bid.
Of course: FOX was talking about a famous baby in order to ... promote a candidate in an election five years from now. :roll:

Anyway:
At approximately 37:30, Shoesmith said that in 2008, he was invited on “The Mark Levin Show,” recalling that Levin had been “rabidly” opposed to anyone calling in to his show questioning Cruz’s eligibility.
The P&E's copy editor should be fired for letting that stinker through. (Levin was anti-Cruz in 2008, when Cruz was the SGoTX?)
Supporting his theory that Cruz might again seek the U.S. presidency in 2024, Shoesmith referenced a Facebook page promoting Cruz’s potential candidacy and compared his political path to that of Ronald Reagan, who sought the Republican nomination in 1976 against then-incumbent Gerald Ford but was defeated.

* * *

Returning to the topic of Cruz’s presidential eligibility, Shoesmith said, “Ted Cruz, much like Baby Sussex, qualified to be prime minister of Canada. Ted Cruz would be in clear violation of the spirit behind the natural born Citizenship clause, which is ‘no split allegiances.'”

Donald Trump had questioned Cruz’s eligibility during the 2016 campaign, and, unlike Barack Obama, whose eligibility remains in question in some Americans’ minds because of his foreign-citizen father and reported forged government documentation, was joined by a number of constitutional scholars, columnists and politicos who said Cruz is not eligible.

“People like Mark Levin want to broaden the field to include people who are borderline-eligible,” Shoesmith opined. “…We’ve all made the case; none of these people are eligible.”

“The main thing is they can’t control him. He is his own man, and they have no control over him, and that scares them to death,” Stewart said of the strident opposition to Trump’s presidency. “There’s no question in my mind this is all about control from powers that want puppets in the White House, in government,” Shoesmith responded. “Listen: if you guys don’t take a solid, firm stand against that, you’re going to end up like Canada…”
Laity wrote:As if to say he knew that he (and Obama) is not eligible to be President, Cruz once said that “If Obama can do it, so can I”. Senator Bob Dole also once said that Cruz was not eligible even to be a U.S. Senator., that “Cruz entered the Senate as a Canadian”. I sued Cruz on this very issue in 2016. I will do it again. Cruz is NOT a “Natural Born [U.S.] Citizen”. Neither is Kamala Harris, et al. An NBC is one born IN the U.S. to parents who are BOTH U.S. Citizens themselves.
Bonus:
Thomas W Arnold wrote: As far as the 2020 election is concerned, I’ll bet that no serious revelations or accusations about “Barack Hussein Obama” and his constitutional ineligibility and use of fraudulent identification documents will be made public before then and certainly not by Donald Trump or anyone connected with him or his campaign. . . .
:shock:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#622

Post by Orlylicious » Tue May 21, 2019 3:56 pm

Miki Booth is PISSED OFF that her dear friend Robert Laity got banned.
Miki Laity.JPG

On a brighter note, Laity contacted criminal Chris Collins. He posted about it at Rharons:

Laity Collins.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#623

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue May 21, 2019 4:45 pm

Miki really really wants to get her own perm ban so she can feel speshul and important too, also. Here's hoping she achieves her heart's desire. If I could help I would.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#624

Post by Orlylicious » Wed May 22, 2019 3:19 am

Totally agree ND, if only there was some way we could help Miki get her wish. :lovestruck:

A message for Birfers (we know you lurk here): Good news and bad news. Bad news is you're still 99,260 signatures away from the 100,000 minimum and you've only got till the end of the month. Does this help demonstrate that it's over, birfers? You should think long and hard after this fails like all the others but with less attention.

Not sure who R.M. is that authored this masterwork, any guesses?

Current Birfer Fantasy 99260 Needed by 5-31-18.JPG

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti ... ity-number


But I promised good news too also :P ... the current fantasy is MUCH more successful from the last one in 2017, that got a total of ... 35. The superfail had the initials R.L., which kinda sounds a bit like Robert Laity.

Previous Birfer Fantasy 35 Signature Fail.JPG

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti ... rn-citizen

Either way, it will be a fail which is appropriate from a "fail of birthers". It's what they do, fail. They should keep hoping Donald will tweet something out about birfing with a link to the petition, that would get way more than 100K signatures. So close and yet so far. Sucks to be a birther.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#625

Post by bob » Mon May 27, 2019 10:58 am

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:NO imposter should have had the backing that Obama has had for his crimes of treason and espionage against “We the People” of the United States of America. There must be dozens, if not more, bad actors complicit with Obama’s coup by fraud during time of war. This issue must never be dropped until Obama and his cabal are brought to the Bar of Justice. Even if it takes 50 years, God forbid. That Obama seemingly escaped prosecution, to date, for his crimes has now emboldened the likes of Cruz,Rubio,Jindal,McCain,Swarzenegger,Harris and others to attempt it. This is a very extremely serious issue of national security. Eight years of Obama has been a disaster on our freedoms and liberties. Obama’s cabal has it’s tentacles fiercely wrapped around our Pentagon, the Intelligence community, the House in Congress and has seriously infringed on the protections that our Constitution provides. Hyperbole? Absolutely not. Our country is under siege by the likes of Pelosi, Schiff, the Clintons, Nadler, Swallwell, Watters, Harris, AOC, Tlaib, and Obama himself. Their attempt to take down President Trump any way they can, even it means framing him, bearing false witness against him, using innuendo and fake news media as well as fake dossiers is unconstitutional on it’s face, criminal in nature and treasonous. This is Memorial Day weekend. The many that shed their blood and those who lost their lives doing so, for the sake of their fellow American’s safety and security, deserve better then this. The fate of our nation is in OUR hands now. Each and every true American has a sacred duty, under God, to preserve for ourselves and to pass this nation’s freedoms and liberties to posterity, in a state of something better then that which we find it to be in now. The Obama cabalists are squirming. It is they that are in the spotlight now, considering that the AG is now investigating the investigators., and what do they do? They attempt to obstruct justice by threats of impeaching AGUS Barr. “Oh what a tangled web we weave when once we practice to deceive”- Sir Walter Scott. The Dems have “a lot of ‘splainin to do”- Desi Arnaz, Sr. as Ricky Ricardo in “I Love Lucy”.
Even with advances in medical technology, I suspect in 50 years that Obama and every birther will be dead. (NADT.)
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”