Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#226

Post by bob » Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:51 am

P&E comments:
Laity wrote:A “Natural Born Citizen” is one born IN the United States to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves. Minor v Happersett, (1803) United States Supreme Court (9-0) unanimous decision.

* * *

My book “Imposters in the Oval office” has recently been recorded as an “authority” on official US Supreme Court documents in Laity v NY,Cruz,Rubio and Jindal.
One would think a legal scholar would know Minor was decided in 1875.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#227

Post by Reality Check » Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:48 am

Laity's "book" is only 41 pages long and in large font according to Rondeau. I haven't found it listed for sale anywhere. A google search shows it's mentioned only in Rondeau's article at the Pest & Efail, the Fogbow, my blog, and Laity's SCOTUS petition for rehearing.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 11615
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#228

Post by Whatever4 » Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:40 am

bob wrote:
Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:51 am
P&E comments:
Laity wrote:A “Natural Born Citizen” is one born IN the United States to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves. Minor v Happersett, (1803) United States Supreme Court (9-0) unanimous decision.

* * *

My book “Imposters in the Oval office” has recently been recorded as an “authority” on official US Supreme Court documents in Laity v NY,Cruz,Rubio and Jindal.
One would think a legal scholar would know Minor was decided in 1875.
Minor error.


"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#229

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:13 am

Whatever4 wrote:
Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:40 am
bob wrote:
Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:51 am
P&E comments:
Laity wrote:A “Natural Born Citizen” is one born IN the United States to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves. Minor v Happersett, (1803) United States Supreme Court (9-0) unanimous decision.

* * *

My book “Imposters in the Oval office” has recently been recorded as an “authority” on official US Supreme Court documents in Laity v NY,Cruz,Rubio and Jindal.
One would think a legal scholar would know Minor was decided in 1875.
Minor error.
And said with a perfectly straight face and tongue planted firmly in cheek. :point:


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8162
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#230

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:20 pm

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Avatar Photo: Michael "Who Says?" Cohen. Says SDNY & Mueller. What it's like at the prison in Otisville where Michael Cohen may go? https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/12/us/micha ... index.html

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#231

Post by bob » Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:27 pm

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#232

Post by Reality Check » Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:28 pm

:clap:


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#233

Post by Reality Check » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:31 am

Laity's Petition for Rehearing was denied as expected.

File_001.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#234

Post by bob » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:43 am

FOR FIRST TIME SINCE AUGUST 2008,
THERE IS NO BIRTHER SUIT PENDING IN ANY COURT.*

Woah.

We have a respite until early 2020, when the usual suspects will challenge a Cruz, or a Haley, or a Harris -- someone who doesn't match their mythical definitions.


* Yes, Laity's was a birther suit: It was brought by a birther, and its arguments were intended to show Obama's ineligibility. And, no, Judy's latest paper thrown at SCOTUS is not pending, because there's no indication it was actually filed.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 8162
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#235

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:18 pm

That's amazing Bob, how will Sharon et al spin this in the tiny, tiny republic of Birfestan?

Laity gets the Last Place Award, Orly Taitz should be green with envy, it's an Award.


Image


Avatar Photo: Michael "Who Says?" Cohen. Says SDNY & Mueller. What it's like at the prison in Otisville where Michael Cohen may go? https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/12/us/micha ... index.html

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#236

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:17 pm

Well, after what appears to have been a life long effort, he has finally achieved a certain distinction.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#237

Post by bob » Thu May 03, 2018 10:54 am

P&E: comments:
Charles Bunratty wrote:Mr. Laity’s petition for a rehearing of his Supreme Court denial was rejected on Monday, April 30.
Rondeau wrote:Can you provide a link?
The top-notch journalism that Rondeau is known for!


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#238

Post by Northland10 » Thu May 03, 2018 1:09 pm

bob wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 10:54 am
P&E: comments:
Charles Bunratty wrote:Mr. Laity’s petition for a rehearing of his Supreme Court denial was rejected on Monday, April 30.
Rondeau wrote:Can you provide a link?
The top-notch journalism that Rondeau is known for!
Did some jerk provide a link that made it through moderation?


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#239

Post by bob » Thu May 03, 2018 1:15 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 1:09 pm
Did some jerk provide a link that made it through moderation?
:fingerwag:

Not some jerk,* and two links: from me and Oscar Piper.

Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.



* :-


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15135
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#240

Post by Reality Check » Thu May 03, 2018 1:17 pm

Yeah, it's really tough to find the Supreme Court Docket Search page and type in "Laity". :doh:


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#241

Post by Notorial Dissent » Thu May 03, 2018 2:25 pm

But but but Rhondoodoo is a super duper plucky girl reporter, she knows stuffs and things, not all that silly computer and innerwebs things.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#242

Post by bob » Thu May 03, 2018 2:31 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Thu May 03, 2018 2:25 pm
But but but Rhondoodoo is a super duper plucky girl reporter, she knows stuffs and things, not all that silly computer and innerwebs things.
Yeah; when some jerk* pointed out that Huff's appeal had been decided years ago, Rondeau begged for a link.


* :-


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#243

Post by Notorial Dissent » Thu May 03, 2018 2:44 pm

And you think she'd read it or pay any attention too it if it was provided ??? :rotflmao: :rotflmao:


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#244

Post by bob » Sun May 06, 2018 12:59 pm

Continuing the P&E's slash fiction of interrogating Obama:
Robert Laity wrote:Ask Obama if both his Mother and Father were U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth in Hawaii. If he says yes, he has perjured himself. In any event, he has never been nor can he ever be a “Natural born Citizen”. An NBC is one born IN the United States [or in one of it’s incorporated territories (Currently the ONLY Incorporated Territory of the US is Palmyra Atoll)] to Parents who were both US Citizens themselves.
What kind of stupid question is that?: At no point has anyone ever said that Obama's father was a U.S. citizen at any point in his life.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#245

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun May 06, 2018 8:19 pm

And that only applies if done under oath. So not only wrong but doubly wrong. Typical Laity.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#246

Post by bob » Sat May 26, 2018 12:56 pm

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:The silver lining regarding that most recent denial is that the four SCOTUS precedents, affirming and re-affirming that a “Natural Born Citizen” is one born in the United States to parents who are both US Citizens themselves, remain undisturbed by SCOTUS and remain “good law” as we say in the legal profession. See: Minor v Happersett, the Venus, Kim Wong Ark and Shanks v Dupont. This is not over.
Clearly, Laity is not tired of so much winning.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16061
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#247

Post by Suranis » Sat May 26, 2018 1:12 pm

bob wrote:
Sun May 06, 2018 12:59 pm
hat kind of stupid question is that?: At no point has anyone ever said that Obama's father was a U.S. citizen at any point in his life.
You forget sir! Obama's real father was Frank Marshal Davis, a US Citizen!


Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#248

Post by bob » Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:37 am

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:The fact remains that both of Obama’s parents were NOT “U.S. Citizens themselves” . Incontrovertible proof that Obama was born in the Lincoln bedroom would not help Obama. Birth in the U.S. does NOT suffice to be a “natural-born citizen”. This definition of a “Narural-born citizen” has been affirmed at least five times by the U.S. Supreme Court. A “Natural Born citizen is one born IN the United States to parents who are BOTH U.S, Citizens themselves.

See: The Venus; Dupont v U.S; Minor v Happersett and Wong Kim Ark., U.S. Supreme Court. These four SCOTUS determinations were left undisturbed in Laity v. NY, Obama and Laity v NY, Cruz, et al.
Laity is technically correct: Laity's latest (final?) fail disturbed neither his belief in what he thinks those cases say, nor their actual holdings.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25293
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#249

Post by bob » Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:22 pm

P&E: comment:
Laity wrote:Ten years later Obama is still walking around free. Obama should be in the Brig. My new book “Imposters in the Oval Office” should be out soon. . . .
One might say: Any day now?


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10886
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#250

Post by Notorial Dissent » Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:31 pm

bob wrote:
Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:22 pm
P&E: comment:
Laity wrote:Ten years later Obama is still walking around free. Obama should be in the Brig. My new book “Imposters in the Oval Office” should be out soon. . . .
One might say: Any day now?
Shouldn't that be "any decade now" at this point??


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”