Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 9402
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#176

Post by Mikedunford » Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:01 pm

Off Topic
January 17th is the correct date for the 125th anniversary of the illegal overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawai‘i. Although the overthrow was carried out by white citizens of Hawai‘i, it was made possible by an internationally wrongful act on the part of the United States of America, which had formally recognized Hawai‘i. The ambassador, who was a strong "manifest destiny" proponent, ordered the US Marines to protect the plantation owners who were carrying out the coup; this was the factor that resulted in the Queen abdicating to avoid bloodshed.


"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.

User avatar
Michael J
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 4:40 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#177

Post by Michael J » Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:37 pm

bob wrote:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:59 am
bob wrote:
Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:58 am
#dreamsfrommyscale
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:


"The genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it might have had in a world dead and gone, but in the adaptability of its great principles to cope with current problems and current needs." - Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 15867
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#178

Post by Suranis » Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:23 am

Funny :D

I had a look at his twit page. Apparently Laity has two and a half thousand followers... but no-one likes his tweets, no-one replies to any of them. He tweets all the time but its like no-one is listening.

I guess he couldn't afford more followers. :D


Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 7828
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#179

Post by Orlylicious » Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:59 am

Laity is still celebrating MLK Day...

Laity Disgrace.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24532
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#180

Post by bob » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:47 pm

As expected: Laity v. New York, SCOTUS Dkt. No. 17-1006:
Jan 17 2018 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2018)
Another opportunity for SCOTUS to indirectly confirm Laity's greateness! :thumbs:


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 7828
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#181

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:37 pm

How much was his self-sanction for this? :lol:

PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... 000001.pdf



User avatar
bob
Posts: 24532
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#182

Post by bob » Mon Jan 22, 2018 6:03 pm

Laity (in his cert. pet.) wrote:Obama's purported Father was a British subject when Obama was born. His Birth certificate has been proven to be forged, in any event. This assertion is public knowledge substantiated by the former Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, Joseph Arpaio, Cold Case Posse which released the findings of at least two independent forensic document examiners.
:thumbs:

(In case there was any doubt that Laity's challenging of Cruz, Jindal, and Rubio wasn't really about Obama.)


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14898
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#183

Post by Reality Check » Mon Jan 22, 2018 6:40 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:37 pm
How much was his self-sanction for this? :lol:

PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... 000001.pdf
I would guess it cost the nut job around $2000 to file. The docketing fee is $300 and printing fees are $1500 and up from what Cody Judy claimed when he was whining about the court rejection of his IFP status.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10472
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#184

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:27 pm

Maybe I missed something, there is a limit to the amount of purple prose I can digest, but didn't Laity commit the same sins of Judy and others before him? It looks to me like he basically just refiled his (losing)case with New York followed largely by "I'm smarter than they are and I'm right and you have to agree with me" explanation of why the case should be reviewed without actually coming up with anything to show why or how or give the USSC a reason to even look at his pile o' dung? He does prove that he is really good at misinterpreting prior cases and assuming rulings they didn't give, but that was unintentional.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#185

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:39 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:27 pm
It looks to me like he basically just refiled his (losing)case with New York followed largely by "I'm smarter than they are and I'm right and you have to agree with me" explanation of why the case should be reviewed without actually coming up with anything to show why or how or give the USSC a reason to even look at his pile o' dung?
That's basically the same thing I understood. He did use the word "globalist" so he has that going for him. Since the court will deny the petition, he will again proclaim that he won by way of the "FOAD means unrefuted truth" doctrine.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#186

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:40 pm

Laity is going about it all wrong. He needs to send a Praecipe to the SCOTUS, ordering them to obey. We know how well it worked for Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf.



User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 26635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#187

Post by Foggy » Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:21 pm

That sounds like a praecipe for disaster.

:rimshot:


I'll be here all week, folks. Remember to tip your waitress!


In my defense, I was left unsupervised.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14898
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#188

Post by Reality Check » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:02 pm

I think we just went over the precipice.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10472
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#189

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:49 am

That would be precipitous.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 7828
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#190

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:06 am

Is it too mean to suggest Laity might have been dropped on his head as a child? Because he still doesn't get Minor and puts it in writing, to the Supreme Court :lol: as he put it, (9) years later






So here's his grand finale. Wouldn't it be great if a bell rang every time there was an incorrect statement?










Thinking about the $2K he spent... Foggy, you could offer that Fogbow would convene a Court of Bun Dogs for $100 and some Grand Slam Breakfasts, it would be the same result but we'd have a nice breakfast and Laity would save a lot of money. Laity if you're reading here consider it, if you don't take Foggy up we'll remember this and remind you you could have saved $1700 which for Tracy Fair is a lot of cigarettes and booze :P



User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 10472
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#191

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:22 am

Considering the number of factual errors in that pitiful effort the bell would shatter. He does parade his ignorance though for all to see.


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#192

Post by Northland10 » Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:38 am

It almost sounds like he is claiming his appeal should not have been denied because his appeal was a matter of right. In other words, since he is allowed to appeal, his appeal should have been upheld.

Oddly, he mentioned nothing about mootness. He would have saved some time and dough if he was capable of considering muteness.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14898
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#193

Post by Reality Check » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:06 am

Laity makes the same phony claim Apuzzo and other Birthers have made that their is an inherent right not to have their ballot tainted by an ineligible candidate. They have always been free to choose to vote for someone else. Even in 2008 where the final two major party candidates were Obama and McCain, whom Laity claims were ineligible, there were other candidates on he ballot and the choice of writing in someone else.

He also told the court this whopper:
His [Obama's] Birth certificate has been proven to be forged, in any event. This assertion is public knowledge substantiated by the former Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, Joseph Arpaio, Cold Case Posse which released the findings of at least two independent forensic document examiners.
Nothing was released and at at least one of the examiners has publicly stated that is not what he found.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#194

Post by Northland10 » Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:11 pm

IIRC, some of the other courts have actual ruled that the "tainted ballot" theory does not confer standing.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

W. Kevin Vicklund
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:45 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#195

Post by W. Kevin Vicklund » Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:24 pm

New York has waived response.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... 20Form.pdf

Round filing in 3...



User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#196

Post by Northland10 » Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:49 pm

W. Kevin Vicklund wrote:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:24 pm
New York has waived response.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... 20Form.pdf

Round filing in 3...
Shocking!!!


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14898
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#197

Post by Reality Check » Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:36 am

Laity lives in Tonawanda, NY. That's not far from Love Canal and the biggest damned land fill on earth. I have been there - a real sh!t-hole. It is possible that Laity suffered brain damage from all the chemical seepage around him.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 14898
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#198

Post by Reality Check » Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:37 am

When I pointed out that Laity hides behind Sharon Rondeau's skirt at the P&E he blocked me on Twitter. Such a #Trumplidite #Snowflake.


"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 24532
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#199

Post by bob » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:20 pm

W. Kevin Vicklund wrote:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:24 pm
New York has waived response.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... 20Form.pdf
"For completeness," Cruz, too (also), now has waived response.

To the deadlist soon enough.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 7828
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: DHS Psy-Ops HQ

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#200

Post by Orlylicious » Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:21 am

I thought Felito was PANICKING over this one! Rharon said so.



Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”