Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#701

Post by bob » Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:14 pm

P&E comments:
Luke Johnson[*] wrote:This brilliant news website shoud be winning awards for outstanding journalism! Is there anywhere to vote for the Post and Email anyone knows about? This must be one of the longest running news sites and that’s because it’s accuracy has never been challenged, its always non biased, only presents facts and welcomes all opinions.

As many others have said, thank you Mrs. Rondeau for this honest place where everyone is welcome to discuss these urgent issues without fear or favor. It’s no surprise our Congress, Courts and Government officials visit this news site to find out the real truth. Maybe you can be part of One America News to reach more viewers? Jack Posobiac is a OAN correspondent and active on Tiwtter, maybe you could contact him to do an on camera interview? Or even better, a weekly segment updated the OAN viewers on all the latest eligibility news (and as we know, there is tons of it!).

We think millions would watch it because these are the most important questions of our time. Between the Post and Email, Freedom Friday, Dr. Taitz, Sheriff Arpraio, Mike Zullo, Cmdr Kershner and the tens of millions of We The People who want this resolved immediately! It’s the only issue we are voting for next year and we trust President Trump is going to drain the swamp.

And Dr. Robert Laity, a big thank you to you Sir. We’ve enjoyed your book and columns and thank you for your wisdom and meticulos research. If you don’t mind my asking, what do you think of citizens who had ancestors like great grandfathers or grandmothers who were naturalized many decades or hundreds or years ago? Would they still not be NBC because obviously a naturalized citizen cannot produce a NBC, so that child also wouldn’t be a NBC, who also can’t produce a NBC, etc. Maybe we need all candidates to submit to DNA testing and make their full family trees public? We’d support that 100% This way we would see who has true full family American NBC status. Is that something we can sue for? We’d donate toward that legal work, our country is at stake. We haven’t found anyone to donate to to give this issue the urgent attention we need, if anyone has any referals thank you.

We feel this is going to happen sooner than anyone expects. President Trump has been laying the groundwork quietly for many years…. he never discloses his plans until they happen. Won’t it be an beautiful America morning when all our hard work pays off and justice is served? We’re going to treat ourselves to an extra dessert that night. )) Let’s always keep the faith Patriots, our day is coming!
Laity wrote:The definition of an NBC is one born in the U.S. to parents who are both U.S. citizens. The parents do not have to be NBCs themselves. They can be naturalized. As long as they are U.S. Citizens. Their child, if born in the U.S. is therefore a Natural Born U.S. Citizen. My Maternal Grandparents were from Poland and Hungary and my Paternal Great Grandparents were from Wales and Cornwall,U.K. However, both my Parents were born in the U.S. as was I. That makes me an NBC.
Thomas W Arnold wrote:Here’s who should be reading about Natural Born American Citizen: Chief Justice John Roberts and his eight Associate Justices. Rather generously, we call them our U. S. “Supreme” Court. Remember that one of them, Justice Clarence Thomas, once disclosed “we’re evading that issue (the NBC issue).” THIS, IN MY HOPEFULLY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED OPINION, IS GARBAGE! Some “Supreme” Court our country has! As far as I’m concerned, these are nine lawyers who should re-examine their roles in light of 18 U.S. Code, Section 2381 and 18 U.S. Code, Section 2382 (check it out for yourself). God help the United States of America. Tom Arnold (military veteran, retired law enforcement officer, nineteen years of formal education, Independent-registered voter, author of “THE SICK TREASONOUS TRUTH SURROUNDING BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA” “AS WITNESSED & EXPERIENCED BY AN ORDINARY AMERICAN CITIZEN,” etc, etc).
Laity wrote:In the last (11) years I sent two letters to the US Supreme Court on this issue. One very recently. It was Thomas that wanted the issue brought up, I discovered. He was whistleblowing to Congress when he told Congressman Serrano that SCOTUS was “evading the issue”. The Court requires at least (4) Justices to agree in order to take up a case. Thomas could not muster the requisite number in order for them to review the matter. Hopefully, given the current makeup of the court, this matter will be taken up. Since the US is a party, the US Supreme Court has original authority to take it up. That is what my recent letter to them asked them too invoke.
*
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34848
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#702

Post by realist » Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:22 pm

Luke Johnson[*] wrote:
This brilliant news website shoud be winning awards for outstanding journalism! Is there anywhere to vote for the Post and Email anyone knows about? This must be one of the longest running news sites and that’s because it’s accuracy has never been challenged, its always non biased, only presents facts and welcomes all opinions.


:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#703

Post by bob » Sun Aug 04, 2019 3:45 pm

P&E comments:
Laity wrote:To run for President or VP knowing that one is ineligible for said office IS Illegal. That is FRAUD. Whether Yang has a chance to win or not, he MUST be vetted. Harris and Gabbard are ineligible. The form that Pelosi fraudulently attested to in the Obama usurpation does exist and it states that the Candidate meets all Article II Criteria for the Office of President. Lying on that form IS perjury and constitutes a felony under 18USC, Sec. 1001. There are also violations in the DC Code for impersonation of a public official”. These are all crimes committed before Obama took office, for example. Clinton v Jones allows the prosecution of crimes committed before a “sitting President”, whether faux or bona-fide, entered office. There is rampant corruption in our government (i.e. “The Deep State”.,”Swamp”., Obama RICO Cabal). that President Trump is doing his utmost to weed out. John Jay knew what an NBC was. He was our first Chief Justice of the U.S. The current SCOTUS should keep that in mind and respect the 4+ decisions made by their predecessors and STOP “Evading the issue” as Justice Thomas disclosed SCOTUS was doing. If it is not nipped in the bud, our Presidency will ultimately be inculcated with foreign allegiances that would render our laws impotent, erode our freedoms and result in our sovereign nations downfall. It is incumbent on each and every American, a civic duty, to participate in seeing that the Constitution is defended. It is a moral imperative and an act of societal self defense. NO Foreign allegiances in our Presidency and Vice Presidency.
Clinton v. Jones was limited to civil (not criminal) lawsuits, "counselor."

As Obama is no longer the sitting president, he could be indicted (as the birthers say) "any day now" -- yet he never is. :think:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15686
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#704

Post by Reality Check » Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:20 pm

Laity should be demand his $0.50 back for the box of Cracker Jack where he got his fake law degree.
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#705

Post by Northland10 » Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:11 pm

Laity wrote:John Jay knew what an NBC was.
If I nothing better to do with my time, I would consider asking Laity exactly where does John Jay state his definition. Unless the brilliant self-trained constitutional "lawyer" has come across some old document lost for centuries, John Jay never said anything more than a commander in chief should be a natural-born citizen, as a check against the admission of foreigners into the administration of government.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#706

Post by bob » Tue Aug 06, 2019 2:13 pm

P&E: Comment On The Comments:
Joseph DeMaio wrote:WHO IS, AND IS NOT, A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?

Your faithful servant’s recent post here – raising the question of whether Mr. Andrew Yang is eligible to the presidency as potentially failing the “natural born Citizen” criterion of Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution – elicited some insightful and interesting reader comments. While normally, a response to a “comment” is usually another “comment,” the quality of the comments (thus far posted) from “Thinkwell,” “Bob68,” “Robert Laity” and “Ed Sunderland” presents the opportunity for a formal post commenting on the comments…, if you will forgive the clumsy redundancies.
Seriously!: Rondeau's publishing a commenter's comment on other commenters' comments. :roll: :yankyank: Continuing:
[In] your humble servant’s view, reliance on Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) and its predecessors (e.g., The Venus; Shanks v. Dupont; etc.) for the proposition that the Court has already “held” that which each commenter above-noted believes to be true, i.e., that § 212 of Emmerich deVattel’s The Law of Nations controlled the Founders’ intent in drafting Art 2, § 1, Cl. 5, is not absolutely controlling.

While appealing, the argument that Minor settles the question for presidential eligibility purposes overlooks the fact that the actual “holding” in Minor was that the Missouri Constitution limiting the franchise to male citizens – thereby denying it to females – did not violate the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That “holding” was the reason why, 45 years after the decision was rendered, the 19th Amendment abrogated (not “overruled,” which only the Court can do) the decision and with it, its “holding,” not only as to Missouri, but nationwide.

Whether or not the Court’s oft-quoted “… but never as to the first…” statement (see 88 U.S. 162, 167-168 (1875)) could be deemed to be a secondary “holding” or instead was “dictum” is another question. But the mere existence of that remaining “holding or dictum” question undermines the argument that Minor is dispositive on the presidential eligibility issue.

[ * * * ]

While your faithful servant agrees with Mr. Laity that the filing of a fraudulent election form by a candidate or the candidate’s agent would be a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, it would still remain for the DOJ and/or an Attorney General to indict, prosecute and leave the decision up to a jury (assuming that no “plea deal” intervened), which jury might (or might not) convict.

[ * * * ]

Long story short: it would appear that the best chance for getting a live “case or controversy” in the courts and in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in time to have any effect would be for a candidate with “standing” to challenge the eligibility bona fides of the ultimate Democrat nominee – say, Kamala Harris; Tulsi Gabbard; or Andrew Yang – prior to the November 2020 general election, to step up, take note and prepare to take action. If the ultimate nominee were someone with clear eligibility bona fides (e.g., Biden), that avenue might be foreclosed. However, if one of the candidates of questionable eligibility ended up being the ultimate Democrat nominee, the cause of action would be “ripe” for adjudication and immediate action would become necessary.
Clinton was a bona fide candidate running against Obama in 2008, and she never birfed. :think:
At the time this post is composed, the Democrat nominating convention is scheduled to take place in Milwaukee, Wisconsin July 13-16, 2020, which is now less than one year away. Right now, the field of those candidates seemingly possessed of the requisite “standing” appears to be limited to (a) any of the Democrat “finalist” losers (no pun intended… OK…, OK…, maybe a little bit intended…) to the ultimate Democrat nominee…, fat chance…, do not hold your breath; or (b) President Trump. Time is running out.
So birthers believed that if, say, Harris, is the Democratic nominee and wins in next November, that the current president will file a (post-election (post-Electoral College?), pre-inauguration) eligibility challenge? :rotflmao:

And, of course:
Laity wrote:On Impeachment of a usurper once he has fraudulently entered into the Office of the Presidency. Impeachment is NOT an option. One who has usurped the office is not actually IN the office from which removal by impeachment is sought and is NOT the bona-fide POTUS. As such ANY legally authorized law enforcement agent in D.C. the venue wherein the crime was committed can ARREST the imposter in the oval office for a violation of the DC Code “Criminal impersonation of a public official”. This opinion is supported by Constitutional scholar and expert Edwin Vieira.
:brickwallsmall:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7176
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#707

Post by Sam the Centipede » Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:46 pm

bob wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 2:13 pm

And, of course:
Laity wrote:On Impeachment of a usurper once he has fraudulently entered into the Office of the Presidency. Impeachment is NOT an option. One who has usurped the office is not actually IN the office from which removal by impeachment is sought and is NOT the bona-fide POTUS. As such ANY legally authorized law enforcement agent in D.C. the venue wherein the crime was committed can ARREST the imposter in the oval office for a violation of the DC Code “Criminal impersonation of a public official”. This opinion is supported by Constitutional scholar and expert Edwin Vieira.
:brickwallsmall:
Awwww!!! What's this weaselly
ANY legally authorized law enforcement agent in D.C. […] can ARREST the imposter in the oval office
nonsense? Citizen's arrest, that's the thing! I want to see birthers march into thd White House to arrest the President and we'll see how that goes. I'm sure the Secret Service would inspect their paperwork very carefully and take appropriate action.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#708

Post by bob » Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:06 pm

P&E: Citizen Contacts Secretaries of State on “natural born Citizen” Issue:
“ATTEMPTED USURPATIONS”

On Friday, New York State citizen and registered voter Robert Laity wrote to Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate, who also serves as President of the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) based in Washington, DC.

In his three-page letter, Laity expressed concern for the placement of ineligible presidential candidates on state ballots around the country for the 2020 election as well as previous recent elections.

* * *

Referring to the previous candidacies of former Louisiana Gov. Piyush (Bobby) Jindal, U.S. Senator from Texas Ted Cruz, and the late Arizona Sen. John McCain, as well as to current presidential candidates Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and Senator Kamala Harris, Laity wrote, “It is clear that there is now a clearly delineated pattern of attempted usurpations of our nation’s highest office by people with dual allegiances and citizenship. This must not be allowed to continue.”

* * *

In a recent op-ed, The Post & Email’s Joseph DeMaio said of the “task” of Gabbard prospectively proving her eligibility . . . . Further, DeMaio raised the question as to whether or not Gabbard qualifies as a “citizen” to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives.

* * *

[Usual birther :yankyank: snipped.]

“I am sending this letter to the respective Secretaries of State and/or other respective State officials responsible for such issues,” Laity closed his letter. “I urge you to keep any candidate for president or vice-president who is not a ‘Natural Born [U.S.] Citizen’ off your respective State’s ballot. I await your response.”
Laity's paper throwing. :yawn:

Bonus:
Vincent Jappi wrote: Minor v. Happersett:
March 29, 1875 – not 1874.
Laity wrote:Minor v Happersett was decided in the October 1874 term. It is therefore properly cited as (1874).
:brickwallsmall:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Whatever4
Posts: 12131
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Location: Mainely in the plain
Occupation: Visiting doctors.

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#709

Post by Whatever4 » Sat Aug 10, 2019 10:00 pm

bob wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:06 pm
Bonus:
Vincent Jappi wrote: Minor v. Happersett:
March 29, 1875 – not 1874.
Laity wrote:Minor v Happersett was decided in the October 1874 term. It is therefore properly cited as (1874).
:brickwallsmall:
Somebody better tell the Supreme Court, the Library of Congress, and pretty much everyone else that their citations are wrong. :rotflmao:
"[Moderate] doesn't mean you don't have views. It just means your views aren't predictable ideologically one way or the other, and you're trying to follow the facts where they lead and reach your own conclusions."
-- Sen. King (I-ME)

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9684
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#710

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:50 am

Laity is full of incorrect information. Today, he commented in the P&E:

Robert Laity
Monday, August 12, 2019 at 1:56 AM
Did you know that Japan declined to attack the mainland of the U.S. in WWII BECAUSE the people were well armed?

It is necessary in a free state to have the means to defend against tyranny. This includes,to a point, weapons on a level with those the tyrants possess. Of course, I realize we shouldn’t all have nukes in our arsenals but we must have “Military level” guns as originally stated in the militia act, which “all abled bodied men from 18 years of age” belongs to.

The right to bear arms must be defended. History can and has repeated itself. Dictatorships start when first the populace is disarmed so that it cannot defend itself. Invasions also occur.

As for Red Flag Laws, that also brings up the fact that Due Process, in confiscating the guns of an individual merely accused of being a danger, is of prime importance, lest the government promulgate an unconstitutional habit of labeling their opponents as unstable whenever they please, just so they can dominate them. Example: This was done by the Nazis in WWII. No Jew was able to own a gun. No one deemed unstable, albeit on unfounded grounds, could own a gun.

We saw what happened in that case!
Yesterday, he was Robert Christopher Laity. Twins? :lol:
Robert Christopher Laity
Sunday, August 11, 2019 at 1:11 AM
Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York once stated that “You don’t need an automatic rifle to shoot a deer”. In response to that statement, I told our leftist Governor Andrew Cuomo, that “We the People” need automatic rifles to defend against prospective tyrants who want to attack us.

Joseph Biden recently said something similar. He Said “You don’t need a 100 round clip to protect yourself”. He also say we “don’t need automatic rifles, buy a shotgun”.

Senator Feinstein asks “why does anyone need an AR-15”

Fact is, that in the original Militia Act, “Military level weapons” were allowed to be owned and borne by all men 18 years and older. ALL abled-bodied men 18 years and older were considered to be IN the Militia.

The first step to sow the seeds of a dictatorship IS to disarm the populace.

“The second amendment is the reset button of the Constitution”-Doug McKay.
Apparently this fake story has been circulating for decades, always finding idiots to propel it. Well Done Robert Laity, you're a finalist for Idiot of the Decade!

Missouri GOP Representative: Japan Didn't Invade U.S. in World War II Because of Armed Populace
Jonathan Dresner is an associate professor of Japanese history at Pittsburg State University.

There are good reasons to bring Japan into the gun control debate in the United States: the relative success of firearms regulation in Japan, the recent rise of gun violence connected to organized crime, the history of weapons-carrying elites, etc. But WWII had nothing whatsoever to do with gun rights, gun control, or the 2nd Amendment.

Why bring this up? Because of Ed Emery, Republican representative to the Missouri state legislature from Lamar, MO. In a video produced last April, Rep. Emery said: We know in a historical context that Japan was considering an invasion on the land mass of the United States of America, but they were afraid to, and the reason they were afraid to [is] because they knew that every American is armed. And although they were not afraid of our armies, they were afraid of our citizens.

Randy Turner, who posted the video recently, says that “That ridiculous story has been circulating for decades”, but this is the first I’ve heard of it. As Turner says, “No reputable historian takes it seriously.”

I’m not a specialist on Japanese military history, but there are a few points that are worth making. Japan did attack American territory directly, both in Hawaii and in the Aleutians, and had substantial plans for occupying Hawaii if a second opportunity for assault presented itself. Japan also attacked the US mainland, or “land mass,” with sea-based and balloon bomb attacks.

More importantly, attacking the U.S. mainland wouldn’t have advanced the primary, or even secondary, strategic aims of the Japanese military in WWII, and wouldn’t have been seriously considered until after more important goals were met. Japan’s primary goal in WWII, remember, was defeating Chinese resistance to Japanese control so as to establish a stable, secure colonial foothold on the Asian continent. In order to maintain military production, Japan needed reliable sources of metals, minerals, oil, and rubber, materials that the United States had stopped selling Japan as part of the attempt to get Japan to back away from China. The attack on Pearl Harbor and the Aleutian island chain was a bit of a feint, to damage US military capacity in the Pacific and to blunt any response to Japanese seizure of the Philippines, Dutch East Indies, and other territories in the South Pacific. Those territories were valuable to Japan for their mineral wealth, oil and rubber: exploiting those resources would allow Japan to continue fighting the war in China.

Needless to say, any greater ambitions Japan had about Pacific domination were cut down by the loss of carrier groups at Midway and Coral Sea, which meant that Japan’s ability to project military might across the ocean was drastically reduced. At no time after that was there any serious discussion of “taking the fight to America.”

As far as fearing the well-armed American populace, instead of the American military, it’s hard to believe that the Japanese military would have treated them differently than the Chinese, who waged both large-force and guerilla-style operations against Japanese forces with great vigor and frequency. I don’t know what the distribution of guns was like in China before and during the Japanese invasion, but remember that China had been through twenty years of warlordism and civil war before the 1937 outbreak of hostilities, so there were certainly plenty of modern weapons and military veterans in the population.
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/150227


Took about two minutes to find the debunking on this, shouldn't Dr. Laity Esq PDQ WTF engage in a bit more research before broadcasting before millions thousands dozens well maybe 10 people? Another FAILURE, Robert Christopher Laity. Your FAIL TROPHY case must be packed!

Fail.jpg

PS: It's been DAYS since his letters to NY and Iowa, and seemingly no response yet, how dare they! Laity's article brought home the bacon for Rharon, there's like 11 whole comments. The excitement is building... let's keep amping them up! :towel:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Avatar Photo: Rusty, the All American Squirrel, was given Karl P. Koenigs' gun. Rusty: "Sucks to be you, Karl."
Don't miss Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12514
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#711

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:43 am

NY in particular, and IA, as well as all the rest of the SOS's of the States and Territories/possessions certainly all have a nutjob file for use for the likes of Laity.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 6112
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#712

Post by neonzx » Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:52 am

From P&E, Sharon

Response Received on “natural born Citizen” Letter
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/08/13 ... en-letter/
... The remaining 49 letters were sent by email through the NASS website, to which Laity received a response early Tuesday morning. That response, from Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, reads:
From: Office, SOS
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 4:06 AM
To: Robert Laity
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Secretary of State’s Office

Thank you for taking the time to contact me; this message is to confirm that I have received your e-mail and am taking the appropriate steps to follow-up.

Your questions, concerns and suggestions are important and depending on the nature of the issue, I may ask one of my colleagues to contact you directly in order to ensure that you receive a timely and informed response.

In the meantime, for news and information on issues directly related to the Department of the Secretary of State, please visit our website at http://www.maine.gov/sos/.

Best Wishes,

Matthew Dunlap
Secretary of State
Looks like an auto-responder but Sharon seems to think it means more than it does. 8-)
To which Trump replied, Fuck the law. I don't give a fuck about the law. I want my fucking money.

User avatar
RoadScholar
Posts: 8030
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:25 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Historic Restoration Woodworker
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#713

Post by RoadScholar » Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:14 am

Yeah. Right. The Japanese didn’t hesitate to take on the Marines with mortars, flame-throwers, machine guns and air support... but drew the line at fighting civilians with shotguns and varmint rifles.

:brickwallsmall:
The bitterest truth is healthier than the sweetest lie.
X3

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12514
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#714

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:11 pm

Auto-FOAD letter, Laity has arrived.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#715

Post by Northland10 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:11 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:11 pm
Auto-FOAD letter, Laity has arrived.
If it weren't for the fact that I don't want to bother a government office, and P&E/Laity aren't worth my time, I would send an email in complete jibberish, and see if I got the same exact reply.

I have a little trouble believing tha Rharon has not figured out the concept of an auto-reply by now or even a standard form response. Laity, I have not trouble at all believing he has not and will not figure it out.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#716

Post by bob » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:10 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:11 pm
I have a little trouble believing tha Rharon has not figured out the concept of an auto-reply by now or even a standard form response. Laity, I have not trouble at all believing he has not and will not figure it out.
:fingerwag: : P&E comments:
Stephen Hiller wrote:That “response” is just so much standard B.S. that any letter to a government official is automatically generated by a computer.
Miki Booth wrote:Yes Stephen Hiller is correct unfortunately.. Same word for word letter I got from Sen. tom coburn. Twice.
:thumbs:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7176
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#717

Post by Sam the Centipede » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:13 pm

:rotflmao: A moment of self-awareness from racist turkey-fondler Miki Booth! Yes Miki, nobody cares about the hateful crap you spout! :rotflmao:

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#718

Post by Northland10 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:33 pm

Sam the Centipede wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:13 pm
:rotflmao: A moment of self-awareness from racist turkey-fondler Miki Booth! Yes Miki, nobody cares about the hateful crap you spout! :rotflmao:
Miki did the hard work for me. Go Miki.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#719

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:48 pm

Spare a thought for the young employees in Senators’ and House members’ offices who actually have to read this dreck.
A recent university graduate would have been a teenager when Obama was first elected and would not have a clue what the birther crowd were blathering about.

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7176
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#720

Post by Sam the Centipede » Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:04 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:33 pm
Sam the Centipede wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:13 pm
:rotflmao: A moment of self-awareness from racist turkey-fondler Miki Booth! Yes Miki, nobody cares about the hateful crap you spout! :rotflmao:
Miki did the hard work for me. Go Miki.
Dayam!! Now you've put Toni Basil into my ears:
♫♬
Oh, Miki, you're so dumb
You're so dumb, you got no brains
Hey, Miki

Oh, Miki, what a pity you don't understand
You talk a load of crap and you get yourself banned
Oh, Miki, you're so stupid, can't you understand?
It's nuts like you, Miki

And what you do, Miki, do, Miki
Don't waste our time, Miki

♫♬


Official music video of Toni Basil bounding

:twisted: I'm sure those of you going to the Fogbow meet-up would like to see the :lovestruck: Southern Belles :lovestruck: – indeed all the Laydeez Of The Fogbow, even the Yankees – recreate Miss Basil's song and dance routine for cabaret night, wouldn't you? :twisted:

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#721

Post by Northland10 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:31 pm

Sam the Centipede wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:04 pm
Northland10 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:33 pm
Sam the Centipede wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:13 pm
:rotflmao: A moment of self-awareness from racist turkey-fondler Miki Booth! Yes Miki, nobody cares about the hateful crap you spout! :rotflmao:
Miki did the hard work for me. Go Miki.
Dayam!! Now you've put Toni Basil into my ears:
You're welcome, or

Willkommen! And bienvenue! Welcome!
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9684
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Occupation: "Scalawag...Part of an extreme, malicious leftist internet social mob working in concert with weaponized, socialized governments to target and injure political opponents.” -- Walt Fitzpatrick

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#722

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:13 pm

:like:

Hope Cinnamon is in the second chorus! :P
Avatar Photo: Rusty, the All American Squirrel, was given Karl P. Koenigs' gun. Rusty: "Sucks to be you, Karl."
Don't miss Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 7176
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#723

Post by Sam the Centipede » Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:24 am

Northland10 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:31 pm
Sam the Centipede wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:04 pm
Northland10 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:33 pm

Miki did the hard work for me. Go Miki.
Dayam!! Now you've put Toni Basil into my ears:
You're welcome, or

Willkommen! And bienvenue! Welcome!
:fingerwag: :nope: Nice try but no lollipop—my ears aren't that tractable!

If you want to plant a mondegreen earworm, you need one of the classics, such as Jefferson Starship's We built this city on sausage rolls.

Or, of course you will remember Johnny Nash singing:
I can see clearly now the pain is gone.
I can see all popsicles in my way.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#724

Post by bob » Sun Aug 18, 2019 1:44 pm

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:Everyday, whether it is a small action or a large action and until we actually get justice on this issue, we must do something to advance the effort. To that end, I wrote to Muriel Bowser, Mayor of D.C. yesterday renewing my 2012 citizen’s arrest of Barack Obama referencing my Metro Police Complaint against him #T14002751 and placing her on “Official Notice” of Obama’s violation of the D.C. Code Title 22-1404 “Impersonating a public official”. Furthermore, I filed a complaint against Kamala Harris and Tulsi Gabbard sending a copy the the US attorney of DC. and to Sharon.
:roll: :mememe: :yankyank:

Of course, Laity doesn't specify what crimes Harris and Gabbard have committed (i.e., legislating under the influence of color).
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26937
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#725

Post by bob » Sun Sep 01, 2019 4:22 pm

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:No act of treason against the US is “too big to prosecute…acknowledge”. In an ideal situation, the powers that be would indict him,try him and if convicted, throw him in the brig or perhaps even give him the death penalty. Obama Usurped the Presidency by fraud, during time of war. That is treason and espionage and that carries the death penalty.

Obama took his faux oath of office on Jefferson’s Q’uran. Remember when he flubbed the public oath on the bible?

Obama also has a mansion in Dubai,UAE. No extradition treaty with the USA.

Hell freezing over isn’t impossible at all. There is a town in Michigan called “Hell”. It freezes over every winter.

His name probably is NOT Barack H. Obama. It may be Barack Sumhadiwidjojo, Indonesian SUBUD leader. Both Stanley Dunham and Loretta Fuddy were both members of SUBUD.
:crazy:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”