Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12244
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6026

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:05 pm

And not even on Friday this time, where have all our traditions gone?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Jim
Posts: 3246
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6027

Post by Jim » Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:16 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:And not even on Friday this time, where have all our traditions gone?
Fading away like the birthers.

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 21095
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6028

Post by RTH10260 » Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:06 pm

Jim wrote:Pretty sad when the most interesting thing on this thread in a while is the strikeout key.
Well, it represents fairly precise the whole court case of Grinols v. Electoral College: could have been striken from the start away ;)
Sekrit Stuffs!
but then we would have missed all the fun

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12244
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6029

Post by Notorial Dissent » Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:35 pm

And Orly all the expense. Hopefully lots.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
ObjectiveDoubter
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Location: Hollywood (more or less)

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6030

Post by ObjectiveDoubter » Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:17 pm

RTH10260 wrote:
Jim wrote:Pretty sad when the most interesting thing on this thread in a while is the strikeout key.
Well, it represents fairly precise the whole court case of Grinols v. Electoral College: could have been striken from the start away ;)
Sekrit Stuffs!
but then we would have missed all the fun
exactly!

(where's your wonderful avatar???)

User avatar
Paul Lentz
Posts: 3666
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Downtown O-town

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6031

Post by Paul Lentz » Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:27 pm

I think it just shows how truly passé Orly Taitz has become when we (collectively) find a threadjack regarding a strikeout key/button to be more interesting than a birther smackdown (in what will likely be Taitz's last birther case) from the 9th Circuit.
The love of power will not win over the power of love.
Orlando, Florida 6/12/16

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6032

Post by woodworker » Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:35 pm

June bug wrote:
bob wrote:
woodworker wrote:And where is the strikethrough button?
open bracket s close bracket [your text] open bracket slash-s close bracket There is no button.
Actually there is. Second row down, 5th button after font menu. Looks like a capital A with a strike through it.
THANKS
Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

Somerset
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:52 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Occupation: Lab rat

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6033

Post by Somerset » Tue Nov 03, 2015 8:47 pm

Paul Lentz wrote:I think it just shows how truly passé Orly Taitz has become when we (collectively) find a threadjack regarding a strikeout key/button to be more interesting than a birther smackdown (in what will likely be Taitz's last birther case) from the 9th Circuit.
Meanwhile, back in Maricopa county...

:-D

(Somewhere, O'rly, there's a skeered little Posseman who desperately needs your help).

User avatar
Geritol
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:11 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6034

Post by Geritol » Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:20 am

The strikeout key/button is a straight line, pleasing to the eye. It enables you to edit copy and show the edits. It is useful in showing multiple edits in multiple copies. It can be used for ironic effect

Orly, other than her use for ironic effect, is not as useful as the strikeout key.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34769
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6035

Post by realist » Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:45 am

Paul Lentz wrote:I think it just shows how truly passé Orly Taitz has become when we (collectively) find a threadjack regarding a strikeout key/button to be more interesting than a birther smackdown (in what will likely be Taitz's last birther case) from the 9th Circuit.
Yabut, the comments are plentiful and express her followers' usual complete ignorance.
Some obviously more ignorant than others, though it's close

And she let a couple of obvious Obot (sane) comments through so her flying monkeys have someone to attack. :lol:
41 Responses to “Press release: 3 years after the case against Obama was originally filed, the 9th Circuit dismisses it saying it is moot, too late”

Danny H
November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:38 am

Flagrant judicial abuse again, but predictable. It is too big for them to let justice prevail. When BHO is determined to be the Manchurian President, then all the laws, executive orders, mountain name changes, etc., will be null and void. The truth is very important, so we must continue to press on. Perhaps Trump can mention this ruling when the media brings it up. You can bet they will not allow Ted Cruz to become President, but will wait until he is on the ballet, fight with the judiciary, resulting in a democrat win. Appeal this decision, definitely!

HB
November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:18 am

There’s an old saying. “We tried the soap box, the ballot box and the jury box. It may well be time to open the cartridge box!!”

DSP2
November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:50 am

The willful treason within the federal government is so pervasive, I can understand why there should be the death penalty for this. When towing a party line over morality and God is to the detriment of society and ultimately to your children’s future is plain evil and shameless. When will the nation’s governors order their state houses to convene secession? Lord have mercy on us all.

bob69
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:13 am

Danny, you are correct, it’s considered to big prosecute.

A few more reasons why no action on the usurper, and none forthcoming:

The leadership of Congress are most complicit, the rest of Congress and the Judiciary is complicit in that they have done nothing to expose Obama’s usurpation and everything to cover for it. That in itself in misprision of treason as a minimum and more likely treason itself. Treason, once committed, cannot be un-committed. They will do nothing to expose Obama’s fraud. This has progressed way too far for the truth to prevail now. Just imagine a constituent of a member of Congress who had lost a loved one in war, having been sent into that war by a usurper pResident. There would be no excuse that member of Congress could make that would satisfy the constituent. Multiply that times thousands, plus decisions affecting the lives of millions, made by polices put in place by a fake president and approved by Congress. Judges making decisions affecting thousands and sometime millions after being appointed by Obama and approved by Congress, Treaties signed by Obama with foreign nations would be invalidated.There is no end to the complications for Congress of exposing the truth about Obama after 7 years of allowing him to do anything he wants.

Congress and the Judiciary’s immediate goal is to get Obama over the finish line in 2017 still officially considered a legitimate president. They will do anything to make that happen, no matter what the regime has in store for America in the regime’s, (we hope), last year. The fraud/hoax is simply too big to prosecute and the decision was made years ago to ride out the usurpation and pretend it never happened.

Paul Marko
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:14 am

The court is basically stating there is a new statute of limitation in reference to fraud, and forgery as applied to the qualifying credentials to hold office. Once in office, the infraction ceases to exist. Is there any doubt that we are now a banana republic?

Andrew Morris
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:15 am

With moron supporters like these (whose incitement to violence you are encouraging) wonder America is a joke. And if you don’t like it here, why not take your own advice and go back home. I’m sure free speech flourishes in Moldova.

Phil stone
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:18 am

Should publish names and addresses of people in 9th ckt involved in this crime. Not moot for another year while the Indonesian in our White House steals from us and brings in millions of illegal aliens infected with parasites and incurable diseases without any exams.

HB
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:30 am

The last time we had a tyrant in this country, his name was dishonest Abe. He pushed the War between the States. 700,000 men were killed. He didn’t care, and neither will this Tin Pot Dictator.

Harry
November 2nd, 2015 @ 11:46 am

1. “The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.”

They did not want to hear the oral arguments as they would have had to rule in plaintiff’s favor.

2. “President Obama is currently serving his second term as President of the United States, and is therefore constitutionally precluded from serving as President again.”

He is constitutionally precluded from serving at all as he is not a natural borne citizen.

3. “However, the natural-borne-citizen clause of the Constitution applies only to eligibility for the office of President of the United States.”

Not true. “However, no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall eligible to that of Vice-President of the
Unites States.” See Amendment XII.

Furthermore, the Speaker of the House is third in line to the Presidency. The Speaker does not have to be a natural borne citizen to be the Speaker, but must be a natural borne citizen to become President.


Harry

Lock-N-Load...
November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:07 pm

Yeah…HB:…LOL! I agree!

And these judges who are allowing this, will find the wrath of Patriots someday…

And they will be held responsible for not doing their job!

They have got the Patriots in America really hot about this…and I am ready to Lock-N-Load!

Lock-N-Load...
November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:15 pm

Hey, poster #6:…

Why don’t you leave and go to some 3rd world POS nation?

You’re just an uneducated, low-life, that can’t stay off the drugs and alcohol!

Only psycho retards post your kind of junior high B.S.!

Grow up, simple-mind!

turnright
November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:49 pm

My overall take is that the Court was afraid to decide on the merits.

Andrew, what do you think about that?

Harry
November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:51 pm

And the fraud continues with candidates like Cruz, Rubio and Jindal.

EyeballNews
November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:27 pm

Idiocy of the 9th never fails to disappoint

Rod Riddle
November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:42 pm


Paul Marko, “NONE WHATSOEVER!”

Don in Oklahoma
November 2nd, 2015 @ 2:46 pm

AND, just who is surprised with the 9th circus decision??

Judy
November 2nd, 2015 @ 4:00 pm

obama tries to go around federal judge hanen
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/ ... mvent-dapa

will
November 2nd, 2015 @ 5:09 pm

firat it was to early next it was in the wrog court now its to late…. what the hell has happened? someone please remove those damn liberal judges and that ass president… there has to be a way….
will

will
November 2nd, 2015 @ 5:11 pm

harrry
And the fraud continues with candidates like Cruz, Rubio and Jindal.

now add the asshole obummer to the mix and which would you vote for?

to me any of them would be better than that traiter… when this country was first founded i believe a lots of judges and politicians and yes even the bastard obummer would have faced trials for treason and faced a firing squad
will

DavidL
November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:21 pm

Our only hope of having justice is electing Donald Trump as president. No doubt Trump will unseal everything Obama sealed, and appoint Ted Cruz as AG to go after Obama.

Jerry G
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:53 am

It’s deja vu all over again. In Nazi Germany the judiciary allowed everything Hitler did without question.

EyeballNews
November 3rd, 2015 @ 5:53 am

Appeal this!

Treebird
November 3rd, 2015 @ 6:25 am

Many Conservatives are behind Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who also are not Natural born citizens. If either gets elected it will serve as a justification for the Obama presidency. I wish people would stop using Obama to justify Cruz, when in reality electing Cruz will validate the Obama’s regime!

hapnHal
November 3rd, 2015 @ 6:58 am

Send the military to remove Obama from office.
Time to clean house.

Dustin C.
November 3rd, 2015 @ 7:04 am

The Ninth Circus Court of Schlemiels — treasonous cowards all!

Will, where there’s a will there’s a way.

Dump the Chump and Stump for Trump.

bob69
November 3rd, 2015 @ 7:10 am

Treebird:

You are right. The main reason the other ineligible candidates are running is to validate Barry’s usurpation so it never comes back to haunt the treasonous Congress and media which aided, allowed and covered for the Obama fraud, the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.

Carol
November 3rd, 2015 @ 7:53 am

When Nixon resigned and Agnew vacated the VP the next one in line was Henry Kissinger. Henry was born in Germany and was not eligible to serve as President. Finally, Jerry Ford was appointed as President.

George Anderson
November 3rd, 2015 @ 9:22 am

There is no rule of law in the formerly great USA anymore.
concerned
November 3rd, 2015 @ 10:05 am

certainly no rule of law.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/obama-to-def ... at_orig=us

mike
November 3rd, 2015 @ 10:09 am

@#27: ????

Baruch
November 3rd, 2015 @ 10:59 am

Same lawlessness, but on a larger scale:

EXCLUSIVE: Obama Trade Rep Michael Froman Worked For European Commission, Farage Reveals Live On Breitbart Radio

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2015/ ... chael.html

Andrew Morris
November 3rd, 2015 @ 11:04 am

Kissinger was never in line. Shows how ignorant you people are. And Turnright, the court wasn’t afraid to rule on the merits. There are none beyond some crackpot allegations for which there is no proof.

mike
November 3rd, 2015 @ 12:13 pm

@#32: Absolutely correct. Nice to see an intelligent post here.

Don in Oklahoma
November 3rd, 2015 @ 1:56 pm

I am worried about this country.

1. We have (supposedly) American citizens
electing muslims to congress, knowing that
they will not or cannot support and defend
the Constitution.

2. Now we have a couple of people running
for President that had NO American citizen
parents when they were born.

3. We have one person running for President
That was born in a foreign country with a foreign
citizen father.

4. We have a admitted socialist running for
President and many are saying that they will
vote for him.

5. We have a confirmed lair running for President
and people are still saying that they will vote for
her.

6. We have a congress that will not even question
a persons eligibility for the office they are seeking.

7. We have a judicial system that “claims” that
an American citizen doesn’t have “standing” to
question a persons eligibility to hold office.

I thank God that I don’t have many more
years left on this earth to witness the destruction
of this once great country.

Rich
November 3rd, 2015 @ 3:04 pm

Trust in the Lord, Don from the great state of Oklahoma.

HB
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:07 pm

#32 and #33 FOAD! Scum!

joebanana
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:11 pm

Who’s to say this “court” isn’t moot?

will
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:20 pm

hapnhale…. the military wont do chit cause obama has control of the military leaders.. all those who could help werer removed or resigned


i guess thats why the constitution talks about a “well armed militia” its time the citizens take action against these judges and other idiots and remove the bastard in the whitehouse and try him for treason amongst other things… and arrest hillary.. she would break to get a deal ….
will

John Cole
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:33 pm

We all thank god for the same reason, Don in Oklahoma!

RSA9999
November 3rd, 2015 @ 4:47 pm

Our worst nightmares will come true without a shot being fired if you leave it up to them. I say we need Guy Fawkes to get the job done. As for the communist bastards Mike and Andrew, I’m tracing you as we speak. Pray I don’t find you. That’s right communists don’t pray.

Rod Riddle
November 3rd, 2015 @ 7:13 pm

Andrew Morris, fellow Communist & devout Hussein supporter. I used to bean your kind in the face with dodgeballs in the 7th grade in P.E. and here you are later in life.
:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/3-years-aft ... /#comments :twisted:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
BillTheCat
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:25 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6036

Post by BillTheCat » Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:37 pm

for the communist bastards Mike and Andrew, I’m tracing you as we speak
lolWUT? :rotflmao:

How are you going to do that, schmuck? Stare at the web page for an hour and suddenly have the IP addresses appear in your mind? Last I checked, you aren't Orly, and you aren't a site admin, so...yeh, I'm sure those "commies" are shaking in their boots over that impotent threat, coward. :twoup:
'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
-Lewis Carroll

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34769
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6037

Post by realist » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:59 pm

This is just so classic...
Earl Gordon
November 4th, 2015 @ 9:19 am
Number 32 Andrew Morris. What the hell do you mean there is no proof that he should not be President!!! He committed more than one felony stating he was a foreign student to get a Fulbright scholarship for Occidental College and also stated he was a foreign student when he went to Columbia University. For me and thousands of others this is more than a misdemeanor and he would have been barred from every seeking office anywhere and not only for that of President!!!!
:brickwallsmall:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Michael J
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 4:40 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6038

Post by Michael J » Wed Nov 04, 2015 3:00 pm

BillTheCat wrote:
for the communist bastards Mike and Andrew, I’m tracing you as we speak
lolWUT? :rotflmao:

How are you going to do that, schmuck? Stare at the web page for an hour and suddenly have the IP addresses appear in your mind? Last I checked, you aren't Orly, and you aren't a site admin, so...yeh, I'm sure those "commies" are shaking in their boots over that impotent threat, coward. :twoup:
Yeah, I'm

ASKEEEEEEERED!!

:sarcastic:
"The genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it might have had in a world dead and gone, but in the adaptability of its great principles to cope with current problems and current needs." - Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26667
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6039

Post by bob » Fri Nov 06, 2015 3:47 pm

OC Weekly: "This is Tyranny!" Orly Taitz Bemoans Dismissal of Her Last Surviving Birfer Suit Against Obama:
Oh, somewhere in this teabagged land Ben Carson is shining bright;
Ted Nugent is playing somewhere, and somewhere homos are light (in the loafers),
and somewhere Trump is laughing, and somewhere the Clintons pout;
but there is no joy in Birtherville--mighty Orly has struck out.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Grumpy Old Guy
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:24 am
Occupation: Retired, unemployed, never a lawyer

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6040

Post by Grumpy Old Guy » Fri Nov 06, 2015 4:06 pm

Aww, don't be too hard on the lady. Maybe she is jealous because she thinks she would make a popular and great president if not for that natural-born citizen thing.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26667
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6041

Post by bob » Sun Nov 08, 2015 1:19 pm

Of course she noticed:
Taitz wrote:See ... the latest garbage thrown at me from our Soros-bought and paid for dirty media. Did Carson ever support me?
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/defiant-car ... arship-of/ :twisted:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15619
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6042

Post by ZekeB » Sun Nov 08, 2015 1:26 pm

I thought Trump owned the media. At least a good share of it. Where was Fox when Orly needed them?
Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
SuzieC
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: No longer a Swing State Central
Occupation: Attorney since 1977. Litigator for 33 years. For 8 years so far Admin Law Judge for 3 state agencies.

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6043

Post by SuzieC » Sun Nov 08, 2015 1:47 pm

bob wrote: Did Carson ever support me?

Orly's sole criterion for Presidential candidates: "Did Candidate X ever support MEEE?"

User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 6975
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6044

Post by Sam the Centipede » Sun Nov 08, 2015 3:39 pm

SuzieC wrote:
bob wrote: Did Carson ever support me?
Orly's sole criterion for Presidential candidates: "Did Candidate X ever support MEEE?"
Will Taitz be standing for Attorney General of California again? She should announce her candidacy NOW (regardless of when the next AG election is) so presidential candidates can immediately pledge their support to her cause. The resulting huge publicity will raise the candidates' profile and it will help electors to make their voting choice: "this GOP guy supports birther queen Taitz for Attorney General; s/he must be a good person of sound character and impeccable judgment".

Or something like that. Or not.

User avatar
esseff44
Posts: 12507
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:40 am

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6045

Post by esseff44 » Sun Nov 08, 2015 3:47 pm

Surely, the Birther Queen will run for something. She might even win if she ran for a local office. If her co=birfer lawyer in San Diego can snag a judgeship, why not the notorious Taitz. We know she still has lots of supporters who would contribute to her campaign and that she is an energetic campaigner.

Aren't there any openings for judges in her district or county?

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 44265
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6046

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Nov 08, 2015 5:11 pm

Esseff -- shut up.

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 15619
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6047

Post by ZekeB » Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:34 pm

The uninformed public has been known to elect some real losers. I cite Kreep as an example.
Ano, jsou opravdové. - Stormy Daniels

Nech mě domluvit! - Orly Taitz

User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7767
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6048

Post by PatGund » Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:44 pm

And once again, these "Constitution-loving Patriots" want a good old-fashioned unconstitutional military junta. Shows their real love for country.

User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 8645
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Location: FEMA Camp 2112 - a joint project of the U.S. and Canada
Contact:

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6049

Post by Kriselda Gray » Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:59 pm

bob wrote:
Of course she noticed:
Taitz wrote:See ... the latest garbage thrown at me from our Soros-bought and paid for dirty media. Did Carson ever support me?
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/defiant-car ... arship-of/ :twisted:
From that OC Weekly article:
On OrlyTaitzEsq.com, the Rancho Santa Margarita lawyer/dentist/real estate saleslady/intended Airbus A321 target cries in her Baltika about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissing Grinols v. Obama, which she filed three years ago.

quote context: http://pllqt.it/rjf3c4
Whaaaa? :dazed: :crazy:
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand... - "Witch Hunt" by Rush

SCMP = SovCits/Militias/Patriots.

Thor promised to slay the Ice Giants
God promised to quell all evil
-----
I'm not seeing any Ice Giants...

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26667
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Grinols v. Electoral College (E.D. Cal. & 9th Cir.)

#6050

Post by bob » Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:10 pm

Kriselda Gray wrote:
On OrlyTaitzEsq.com, the Rancho Santa Margarita lawyer/dentist/real estate saleslady/intended Airbus A321 target
Whaaaa? :dazed: :crazy:
That's just poking fun at Taitz's paranoid delusions that "the regime oligarchs" are out to get her.

I wonder which jerk tipped the OCW off about Grinols? Sekrit Stuffs!
:-
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”