Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34769
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#276

Post by realist » Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Yeah... cuz a Magistrate Judge is not, like, you know, a real judge. Or sumpin' like that.I've only skimmed Sibley's word salad, but the jist is that he claims only an Article III judge can dismiss an indictment.:yankyank:Yeah, that, and that Judge Robinson's signature is over the block which says "District Judge" IIRC and he sez Judge Robinson isn't one, so... illegal/void/etc.
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
PatGund
Posts: 7767
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Edmonds. WA
Contact:

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#277

Post by PatGund » Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:59 pm

So what's the deal with Elizabeth Ann Duke? :confuzzled:She's the one who Martha Trowbridge claims is really Ann Newman, aka President Obama's "real" mother.Sibley signed on to Trowbridge's delusionfest

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 28210
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#278

Post by Foggy » Wed Sep 25, 2013 6:57 am

Yes, and I'm Elizabeth Duke and I live in the White House with my baby boy. The whole "web designer/health insurance agent in Raleigh" thingy is a ruse, I'm reluctant to report. On the bright side, I eat that great food from the White House chefs and my only responsibility is to stay on the fifth through eleventh floors beneath ground level so the Feebs won't find me. More lies coming when I thinks them up.

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 21048
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Near the Swiss Alps

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#279

Post by RTH10260 » Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:23 am

Yes, and I'm Elizabeth Duke and I live in the White House with my baby boy. The whole "web designer/health insurance agent in Raleigh" thingy is a ruse, I'm reluctant to report. On the bright side, I eat that great food from the White House chefs and [highlight]my only responsibility is to stay on the fifth through eleventh floors beneath ground level[/highlight]so the Feebs won't find me. More lies coming when I thinks them up.Dang --- who would ever think you share shelf space in the top secret archive site where Obama keeps all his executive orders by which he is running the country :-# :- ?( =)) :dontwanttolook:

User avatar
ArthurWankspittle
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 12:38 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#280

Post by ArthurWankspittle » Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:03 am

Yes, and I'm Elizabeth Duke and I live in the White House with my baby boy. The whole "web designer/health insurance agent in Raleigh" thingy is a ruse, I'm reluctant to report. On the bright side, I eat that great food from the White House chefs and my only responsibility is to stay on the fifth through eleventh floors beneath ground level so the Feebs won't find me. More lies coming when I thinks them up.You could be a body double for Michelle.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34769
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#281

Post by realist » Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:16 am

This is HUGE!!!





Well, at [link]ORYR,http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/10/si ... Records%29[/link] anyway.





Update: The Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has set for Conference my Motion to Direct the Clerk to File my Petition for Certiorari and Motion to Expedite on Friday, October 11, 2013. [highlight]During the Conference, the Nine Justices will decide whether to grant or deny my Motion.[/highlight] Typically, the Clerk releases the results of the Friday Conferences the following Tuesday. - Montgomery Blair Sibley.





Excerpt: Petitioner’s Motion to Direct Clerk to File Petitioner’s (i) Petition for Writ of Certiorari and (ii) Motions to Expedite Consideration of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Leave to File Ex Parte and Under Seal and to Set Expedited Schedule for Briefing and Oral Argument;


No. 13M38


Title:


Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitioner


v.


United States, et al.


Docketed: September 20, 2013


Lower Ct: United States District Court for the District of Columbia


Case Nos.: (88-cr-00145)





~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Sep 13 2013 Motion of petitioner to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari filed.


Sep 25 2013 [highlight]DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013[/highlight].
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#282

Post by Northland10 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:37 am

This is HUGE!!! Well, at [link]ORYR,http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/10/si ... Records%29[/link] anyway. No. 13M38 Title: Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitionerv.United States, et al.Docketed: September 20, 2013Lower Ct: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Case Nos.: (88-cr-00145)~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Sep 13 2013 Motion of petitioner to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari filed.Sep 25 2013 [highlight]DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013[/highlight].Does SCOTUS require Sibley to request leave to file a writ now or is the extra motion due to his other requests?
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
verbalobe
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#283

Post by verbalobe » Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:47 am

Does SCOTUS require Sibley to request leave to file a writ now or is the extra motion due to his other requests?I think we need a proctologist to explain the extra motion.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#284

Post by bob » Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:20 pm

Does SCOTUS require Sibley to request leave to file a writ now or is the extra motion due to his other requests?Sibley is going full Taitz and accusing the clerks of not docketing his filings. So he filed a motion to allow his filings to be filed. :crazy:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31128
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#285

Post by mimi » Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:26 pm

How many times can you scam a birther?We're still counting.

User avatar
Piffle
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#286

Post by Piffle » Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:26 pm

Does SCOTUS require Sibley to request leave to file a writ now or is the extra motion due to his other requests?I think we need a proctologist to explain the extra motion.Or perhaps a dentist. Sibley only has two moving parts -- his mouth and his asshole -- and they're interchangeable.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#287

Post by bob » Wed Oct 02, 2013 5:42 pm

Sibley is going full Taitz and accusing the clerks of not docketing his filings. So he filed a motion to allow his filings to be filed. :crazy:So I read [/break1]montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/MotiontoDirectClerk.pdf]Sibley's motion; executive summary: Sibley attempted to file a cert. petition, but the clerk bounced it because there's no federal appellate court or state supreme court decision at issue. Citing [/break1]justia.com/cases/federal/us/318/332/case.html#340]McNabb v. United States, Sibley then explained he wants to invoke SCOTUS' inherent supervisory jurisdiction (to spank the magistrate judge for "wrongly" dismissing Duke's indictment). The clerk ignored him, so he filed this.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#288

Post by bob » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:05 pm

No. 13M38 Title: Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitionerv.United States, et al.Docketed: September 20, 2013Lower Ct: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Case Nos.: (88-cr-00145)~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Sep 13 2013 Motion of petitioner to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari filed.Sep 25 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013.[/break1]supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13m38.htm]Denninied.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31128
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#289

Post by mimi » Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:23 am

I didn't know that Neil Sankey was involved in this.http://nathanbickel.files.wordpress.com ... 5&h=224Pic of private investigator, Neil Sankey, who discovered in May 2013, that the Elizabeth Duke indictments and arrest warrant had been dismissed in 2009 under Obama, by the NCIC (National Criminal Information Center by FBI).That is from Nathan Bickel's website. Religious freak/conspiracy nut/general hater.Anyhoo, Sibley filed a "Motion for Reconsideration". I think. :-? Accordingly, I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification in which I ask the Court to clarify upon what authority they are denying me the right to Petition them for redress of my grievances. But there is more, much more:In that same pleading I detail publically that which I was loathed to do and thus sought to file the following allegations under seal. Simply stated, it appears that Magistrate Judge Robinson – under threat that her son could be committed to Maryland State Prison where the threat of violence is much higher than in the federal system and knowing her son was facing 40 years in prison – caved to the Obama Administration’s peculiar demand to dismiss an indictment against the fugitive, domestic terrorist, Capitol-bombing Elizabeth Duke made without explanation by granting that motion and then signing the order impersonating an Article III judge. In return, her son received the velvet glove treatment from the federal government.Additionally, I have sent this now public allegation by Letter to the fifteen judges of the D.C. District Court to see if they will address this apparent perversion of the federal criminal justice system for reasons I know, but have yet to make public.Time will tell, but I won't wait long and I do have at least one more trick up my sleeve . . .[/break1]blogspot.com/2013/10/obama-dismisses-indictment-against_23.html]http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/2013/10/o ... st_23.htmlthe pdf:[/break1]montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/MotionReconsider.pdf]http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/li ... nsider.pdf

User avatar
Dallasite
Posts: 3085
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:38 pm
Location: About 40,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Occupation: Senior Scheduling Manager
Chemtrails Program
Human Factors and Behavioral Sciences Division

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#290

Post by Dallasite » Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:28 am

Monkey Boy Sibley said:Accordingly, I have filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification in which I ask the Court to clarify upon what authority they are denying me the right to Petition them for redress of my grievances. But there is more, much more:Apparently he doesn't understand the difference between the right to petition and the right to receive a flying pink pony with rainbow farts. Moron.
"I drank what?!?!" - Soctates, 399 BC

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31128
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#291

Post by mimi » Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:52 am

I forgot to say that the letter Sibley sent to the 15 judges is linked as well. Here's the pdf:[/break1]montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/Roberts3.pdf]http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/li ... berts3.pdfHe sez he's gonna also send it to a bunch of other judges. 173 of them.I suppose that, as a judge, she can't sue him for libel. Or maybe the judges all just file this crap in file 13?I hope he's using USPS for these mailings. :-bd

User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 8645
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Location: FEMA Camp 2112 - a joint project of the U.S. and Canada
Contact:

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#292

Post by Kriselda Gray » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:05 am

How did this whole Elizabeth Duke thing get started in the first place? I know some crazy lady thinks that she's Obamas "real" mother, but is that the starting point?
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand... - "Witch Hunt" by Rush

SCMP = SovCits/Militias/Patriots.

Thor promised to slay the Ice Giants
God promised to quell all evil
-----
I'm not seeing any Ice Giants...

User avatar
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
Posts: 5176
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:28 pm
Location: East Coast
Contact:

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#293

Post by Dr. Kenneth Noisewater » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:15 am

How did this whole Elizabeth Duke thing get started in the first place? I know some crazy lady thinks that she's Obamas "real" mother, but is that the starting point?Crazy lady somehow thinks Ann Dunham is Elizabeth Duke and the lady who hung out with Malcolm X. That's they're all the same person using different aliases. She still thinks Malcolm X is Obama's father while at the same time birthers believe Frank Marshall Davis is the father. Soon I think Martha will claim Malcolm X was an alias for Frank Marshall Davis.

User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 8645
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Location: FEMA Camp 2112 - a joint project of the U.S. and Canada
Contact:

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#294

Post by Kriselda Gray » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:18 am

That's just nuts.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand... - "Witch Hunt" by Rush

SCMP = SovCits/Militias/Patriots.

Thor promised to slay the Ice Giants
God promised to quell all evil
-----
I'm not seeing any Ice Giants...

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#295

Post by bob » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:28 am

How did this whole Elizabeth Duke thing get started in the first place? I know some crazy lady thinks that she's Obamas "real" mother, but is that the starting point?Crazy lady somehow thinks Ann Dunham is Elizabeth Duke and the lady who hung out with Malcolm X. That's they're all the same person using different aliases. She still thinks Malcolm X is Obama's father while at the same time birthers believe Frank Marshall Davis is the father. Soon I think Martha will claim Malcolm X was an alias for Frank Marshall Davis.Trowbridge decided Duke and Dunham looked alike. Sankey provided Trowbridge with unspecified linkage between the two. (The specifics of the linkage may (or may not) be behind Trowbridge's paywall.)
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26659
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#296

Post by bob » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:32 am

I suppose that, as a judge, she can't sue him for libel. Or maybe the judges all just file this crap in file 13?Although the litigation privilege protects Sibley from what he puts in his pleadings, it likely doesn't cover what he says on his blog or radio shows.Still, it isn't worth the judge's time or money to go after Sibley, who likely has very little money (but lots of time on his hands).
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#297

Post by gupwalla » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:34 am

How did this whole Elizabeth Duke thing get started in the first place? I know some crazy lady thinks that she's Obamas "real" mother, but is that the starting point?I wouldn't spend too much time trying to explain the rational thought processes of crazy people. There aren't any. Crazy people be crazy.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

debdeb
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#298

Post by debdeb » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:19 pm

Hidee-ho. So, I'm a chronic lurkerer that has been yanked from the shadows by the startling discovery that, apparently, Montgomery Blair Sibley lives in my apartment building! It's a huge building with lots of crazy people, but knowing that a crazy birther shares my laundry room amuses me to no end. I don't know much about him (or her?) as I usually stick to the Orly trainwreck, but I will now go reading this thread from the beginning to learn more about my neighbor. You know, just case I get stuck in the elevator with him and need to make conversation.Ok. Back to my hiding place.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#299

Post by Northland10 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:22 pm

How did this whole Elizabeth Duke thing get started in the first place? I know some crazy lady thinks that she's Obamas "real" mother, but is that the starting point?I have yet to understand why they are having a mad about the PA and the court dropping the 20+ year-old indictments and bench warrant. As far as I understand, except when the statute of limitations runs out, the could arrest and indict her again if she ever reappears. It's not like dropping the current warrants makes her no longer a suspect.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
kate520
Posts: 15661
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Occupation: servant of cats, chicken wrangler
Contact:

Ex Rel Sibley v. Obama (USDC D.C.) - Quo Warranto - Acts I & II

#300

Post by kate520 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:56 pm

Debdeb, I believe Blair House and Sibley Memorial Hospital give this dork reason to think he should be obeyed in all matters. Welcome out of lurking. Once out, why go back in? ;;)
DEFEND DEMOCRACY

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”