Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#651

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:41 pm

Except that he's totally off the door jamb as to fact, history, and reality. Little things.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#652

Post by Orlylicious » Tue Jun 04, 2019 3:52 am

Think bigger Laity!

Hearing North Korea is having a big clearance sale. Why not get a few nuclear weapons, Robert Laity; then you can really demonstrate this great plan. Maybe you'll be an American hero.

But as Foggy said to Orly years ago... to keep out our attention we need to see something SPECTACULAR!

Laity, here are some of the best of Cirque so you can study up on what we're taking about.

Clearly, you could be doing any of them

http://www.citypages.com/arts/10-most-t ... ts-6592735


/talking to idiot off
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8055
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#653

Post by Northland10 » Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:41 am

Orlylicious wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 3:52 am
Think bigger Laity!

Hearing North Korea is having a big clearance sale. Why not get a few nuclear weapons, Robert Laity; then you can really demonstrate this great plan. Maybe you'll be an American hero.

But as Foggy said to Orly years ago... to keep out our attention we need to see something SPECTACULAR!
He needs the only completely perfect act in our repertoire...

THE GRAND FINALE



NADT
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#654

Post by bob » Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:55 am

P&E comment:
Laity wrote:In the Federal sector Administrative processes must be exhausted prior to taking a matter of employment discrimination up in a federal court. EEO Complaints in the Federal sector allow only 30 days to file with an EEO Counselor and 45 days to file with the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. There are basic discrimination cases which involve discrimination based on such things as race,gender,age,disability,et al. There is also an anti-retaliation basis when one is retaliated against for engaging in protected EEO activity. When one is wrongfully terminated or is given a suspension of 15 days or more, that opens the M.S.P.B. process to a federal employee. These are called adverse actions. There are also prohibited personnel practices. When one has both a discriminatory basis and has suffered an adverse action or PPP in tandem with discrimination, one may file what is called either a “Mixed Case complaint” with the EEOC or a “Mixed case appeal” to the MSPB. Federal unions do not routinely represent employees in such statutory appeals in the administrative process. However, one does not actually need an attorney until such time as the case reached the judicial level (after all administrative processes are exhausted). That said, many employees may want to get an attorney anyway since their union will not help them, unless their collective bargaining agreement negotiated such a provision. There are individuals available who are not attorneys, who never-the-less are perspicacious in the statutory appeals process. I am one of those people. Federal regulations do not require that a designated representative be an attorney. I have represented scores of federal employees for (42) years. I can, by law, take no pay. My point here is, that most employees cannot afford the services of an attorney at the rates some of them charge. Seeking out a statutory appeals specialist is an alternative to hiring a lawyer, until such time as said case is ripe for appeal to the courts.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15554
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#655

Post by Reality Check » Thu Jun 06, 2019 12:42 pm

Someone found in the records a case Laity had filed during the Bush I administration against the Department of Veterans Affairs where he worked at the time. I posted a link on my blog to a summary of the appeal of a denial of a request he made to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). He was reprimanded by a supervisor for using profanity at work. He wanted to have the reprimand expunged from his record. He was also removed as a union steward for using intemperate language.

He sounds like a real jackass.

https://openjurist.org/5/f3d/1504/laity ... ns-affairs

https://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/2018/ ... arch-16th/
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#656

Post by Notorial Dissent » Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:10 pm

Just the qualified competent sort of person you'd want representing you in such a situation. One can only hope his vast encyclopedic knowledge there wasn't on par with his grasp of constitutional law. :sick:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#657

Post by Orlylicious » Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:55 am

Sure nice of Laity to get up at 4:41am to educate us on a Sunday morning. Does anyone wake up early to hang out on the P&E comment page refreshing to see if any new comments are posted? Embarrassed to say I don't. :oops: Well, clearly Biden didn't know, even Laity is giving him a pass, so Biden was president, who knew? But what Laity hasn't gotten to yet though is... if Biden was indeed President for two terms, can he run again? I'd love to see Laity push that argument :lol:

If he reads here: "With your mastery of the Twenty-Second Amendment, Mr. Constitutional Scholar, what does America do? You're our only hope Robert Laity. Since he was president, can Joe even run?"*
One Response to "The De Facto Vice-President"
Robert Laity
Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 4:41 AM
I am going to attempt to answer this question. Joe Biden is a Natural Born Citizen. If he, in good faith, accepted that Obama was bona-fide and did not conspire with him, Biden was actually the real President from 2009 until 2017, only Biden didn’t realize it. If Biden did know that Obama was a fraud and usurper, Biden would have been complicit with Obama’s crimes and would be guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and be impeached (in an ideal world). Obama was not entitled to be tried under the Impeachment protocol since he was not ever in the office from which his removal would have been desired. Impeachment would not be proper. Obama was not President. This view is supported by Constitutional Scholar Edwin Vieira. Obama as an imposter was subject to being arrested by any lawful agent of the law in DC. There have been two usurpers in our history, Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. Arthur was VP to President Garfield. Arthur served as a fake “Presdent” without a VP. Obama while not a Natural Born Citizen had a Constitutionally bona-fide VP, Joe Biden. Obama clearly has a Constitutional encumbrance that Biden did not have. Had the powers that be removed Obama from the WH, Biden would be legally entitled to enter the Office of the Presidency. Again, Biden’s right to succeed Obama depends on whether Biden knew that Obama was an imposter or not. It behooves President Trump to find out.





* :lol: :rotflmao: :dazed:
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#658

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:44 am

What a wondrous spouting of mental gymnastics, and on that note I 'm going back to bed as it made my brain hurt.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#659

Post by bob » Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:18 am

Orlylicious wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:55 am
Does anyone wake up early to hang out on the P&E comment page refreshing to see if any new comments are posted? Embarrassed to say I don't.
Off Topic
Even my enthusiasm for birtherism is waning. :shock:

Oh, sure, I still lurves me some P&E, Taitz, etc. But I check them less often than I used to, and those that I used to check "less often" I now rarely check. For example, I haven't looked at Gallups' Facebook page in weeks, and I haven't missed it. Because there's just nothing new: Zullo and Gallups can barf up the same empty promises, but even I am finding their broken record boring.

When Laity finally sues Harris, my interest will likely pick up again.
Well, clearly Biden didn't know, even Laity is giving him a pass, so Biden was president, who knew? But what Laity hasn't gotten to yet though is... if Biden was indeed President for two terms, can he run again? I'd love to see Laity push that argument.
Laity's responding to some brain fart by Joseph DeMaio. E.g.:
DeMaio wrote:If [the 2008] election were to be declared void because of Obama’s constitutional ineligibility, why should Biden’s claim to have been properly “elected” vice-president survive? . . .

Memo to P&E readers: a scenario voiding the 2008 and 2012 elections of Obama to the presidency will never happen, of course, but it is fair game for discussion.
It must be nice to have so much free time that you can "discuss" undoing an election from a decade ago.

Or:
[W]hy would it not be appropriate for Joe Biden to request directly from Obama (1) the sealed, certified copy of his original Hawaiian birth certificate purportedly delivered to him by Perkins Coie lawyer Judith Corley in 2011, and (2) a letter instructing the Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu to provide written confirmation that he was, as claimed, actually born there?
:brickwallsmall:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#660

Post by bob » Mon Jul 01, 2019 2:15 pm

P&E comments:
Jeffery Harrison wrote:I grew up in Buffalo NY and lived just a few blocks from Robert Laity. We had a nice talk many months ago and I did purchase several of his book, IMPOSTERS IN THE OVAL OFFICE. I mailed some books to Legislators and gave the others out, they went to nice homes. I suggest others to get a few copies and get some of these book to your U.S. Congressmen and U.S. Senators (with cover letters and follow-up phone calls and etc..).

Also, those who live in New York state I would request that you support Robert and assist him in contacting your state and local elected officials, the media, and as well as your U.S. Congressmen and U.S. Senators and the N Y Board of Elections what NBC means “Natural Born Citizen” as the standard and requirement to run for President and not “Citizen” (alone).

Robert has been an aggressive “Point Man” and his efforts have been extensive. We are blessed to have him and again, those in New York “back him up” and contact your media, Board of Elections, and the reps. in DC.
Kerchner wrote:Has any resident of NY attempted to bring this to the attention of Attorney General Barr and/or the Federal Election Commission since the requirement governs a federal elective office, not state, and thus the federal government has a say in the accuracy of this information being provided to residents of the state of NY?
Laity wrote:Thanks for the kind words and words of support. I am now composing a letter to Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York. I will provide a copy to Sharon after it is finished. The recalcitrant refusal of the State to conform with Federal criteria with regard to electing our President only serves to illustrate that the State of New York is not concerned with facilitating fair and lawful elections. Andrew’s father Mario would not be proud of him. I had respect for Mario Cuomo when he was Governor of NY. Andrew is another story altogether.
Bonus:
Laity wrote:On the “goofy” argument that no English translation of Vattel’s French translation, the fact is that in 1787 the official language of Diplomacy WAS French. The founders were familiar with the French Language. It was Benjamin Franklin who brought the book back with him from France. Ben was Ambassador TO France. It is a book that George Washington borrowed from the Library and never returned (Don’t worry, the family recently gave the library another copy of the book from that era valued at $300,000). The founders were very educated men. They understood and read French. “Les Naturels. ou indigenes, sont ceux qui sont, nes dans le pays de parents citoyens”. The Natural Born are those born in a country to parents who are citizens.

It does not say “de UN Parent Citoyen” or of one parent citizen. It says “Parents Citoyens” PLURAL. Since we all have only (two) Parents, THAT is the only conclusion that can be reached by use of the phrase “de parentS citoyenS”.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#661

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:01 pm

Their lives have purpose again!

Awww, what a shame Laity can't share all this wonderful information on Twitter, still suspended. Maybe Foggy will give Laity his password to post on his account like Koenigs does with DOL. :lol:

Suspended Laity.JPG



He's still on Facebook though for the moment letting his stupid racist flag fly. No likes, no shares, no comments, hope that pisses him off.

https://www.facebook.com/robert.c.laity

Laity Racist.JPG

Laity Racist 2.JPG


He's posted this three times and nobody was interested.

Laity Racist 3.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#662

Post by bob » Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:07 pm

P&E: New York State Citizen Contacts Governor about Inaccurate Presidential Requirement:
FROM ONE GOVERNOR TO ANOTHER

On Monday, New York State citizen and registered voter Robert Laity sent a letter to Gov. Andrew Cuomo bringing to his attention an inaccurately-stated presidential eligibility criterion on the website of the New York State Board of Elections (NYSBOE).

In response to our article published Saturday generated by an email Laity sent to the NYSBOE on Friday, early Monday morning Laity said he would contact the governor as a result of what he sees as “the recalcitrant refusal of the State to conform with Federal criteria with regard to electing our President” over more than a decade.

Laity’s contacting the NYSBOE last week was one of multiple attempts he has made since 2008 to correct the stated citizenship requirement for the nation’s chief executive of “born a citizen” to “natural born Citizen,” as Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires. The email was copied to the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, The New York Daily News, the Enforcement Council of the BOE; and this writer.

The Post & Email’s inquiry to the election agency approximately two years ago about the misstatement received no response.

[ Usual birther :yankyank: snipped.]

With a subject line of “New York State non-compliance with the U.S. Constitution,” Laity’s letter begins:
You and several other New York State Officials, having been formally apprised and notified, a decade ago, of non-compliance by the State of New York regarding New York Board of Election’s erroneous misrepresentation of the U.S. Constitution’s mandatory criteria for being elected and serving as President of the United States.,as being “born a citizen” versus being a “natural born citizen”, to date the State of New York continues flagrantly and contumaciously to ignore the U.S. Constitutional criteria in Article II, USConst.
Further, Laity chastised the NYSBOE for what he said is a “derogation of New York’s own election laws,” with a reference to New York Consolidated Laws ELN Section 6-122, the full wording of which reads:
A person shall not be designated or nominated for a public office or party position who (1) is not a citizen of the state of New York; (2) is ineligible to be elected to such office or position; or (3) who, if elected will not at the time of commencement of the term of such office or position, meet the constitutional or statutory qualifications thereof or, with respect to judicial office, who will not meet such qualifications within thirty days of the commencement of the term of such office.
Laity concluded his letter with:
In closing, I wish to formally reiterate what a “Natural Born Citizen” is, per several U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

In Minor v Happersett, USSCt. (1874) the court unanimously agreed that a Natural born citizen was a person born in the United States to parents who were both U.S. Citizens themselves. I demand that you take proper corrective action to remedy New York States continuing non-compliance to federal requirements and criteria. I also hereby inform you that Kamala Harris and Tulsi Gabbard are not “Natural Born Citizens” of the U.S. pursuant to the aforementioned referenced U.S. Supreme Court precedents.
Laity's :mememe: paper throwing.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#663

Post by Orlylicious » Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:21 pm

:lol:

Image
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8055
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#664

Post by Northland10 » Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:23 pm

Orlylicious wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:21 pm
:lol:

Image
He should sue the cloud for ignoring him and not recognizing he is a "doctor."
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#665

Post by bob » Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:21 pm

P&E comment:
Of “Birthers,” Racists and Village Idiots

[ * * * ]
Laity wrote:I have said it many times. One’s race is not a license to break the law. That there are usurpers who happen to be Hispanic, Black or Oriental does not make them immune from criticism for doing so. Chester Arthur was White. John McCain was White. They were both ineligible to be President. Being Caucasian OR non-Caucasian is not a ticket to get out of jail free.
Here's some puppets more woke than Laity:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#666

Post by bob » Fri Jul 12, 2019 11:52 am

P&E: Citizen Contacts U.S. Supreme Court on “Pattern of Usurpations” by Presidential Candidates:
WHAT IS A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?”

As he has in the past, New York State citizen Robert Laity on Friday sent a letter to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, copied to all members of that body, captioned, “Usurpations of the Presidency by fraud and subterfuge; Petition for Redress of Grievances.”

Laity’s letter begins, “It is with intense concern for this nation’s national security that I write to you today. I have written to this court on this issue before, over a decade ago. I have also had two cases before this court on this issue.”

As Laity further noted, he filed a lawsuit originating in the State of New York challenging the presidential eligibility of Barack Obama and more recently, a case claiming that three 2016 presidential candidates were ineligible for the office they sought.

“Since 2008 there has been demonstrated a pattern of usurpations by constitutionally barred individuals to attain, by fraudulent means, to the Presidency of the United States of America,” Laity’s letter continues, citing “Article II, Section I, Clause 5” of the U.S. Constitution, known as the “natural born Citizen” clause.

[Usual birther :yankyank: snipped.]

On page 2, Laity listed those he believes were and are ineligible to serve as President of the United States, including Obama, the late Sen. John McCain, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, former Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, and current presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Tulsi Gabbard.

* * *

“I move this court to exercise it’s [sic] original jurisdiction authority and take affirmative action to stop this ongoing pattern of unconstitutional incursion into the office of the Presidency of our sovereign nation by persons whom which the founders never intended to admit to said office,” Laity’s letter concludes.
Laity's paper throwing is newsworthy!

Bonus:
Laity wrote:I am going to keep pursuing closure on this issue of grave national security import until such time as the U.S. Supreme Court stops “Evading the issue” as Associate Justice Clarence Thomas previously claimed in a Congressional hearing in a comment made to then House Appropriations sub-committee Chairman Rep.Jose Serrano, D-NY in 2010.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Orlylicious
Posts: 9249
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:02 pm
Location: With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#667

Post by Orlylicious » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:18 pm

Super clever of Laity to wait until SCOTUS was on vacation until the first Monday in October to express his intense concern!

Which is more likely?

a) They rush to get Laity's letter to all justices so they can carefully review it over the Summer so it can be acted upon immediately in October

b) Since the letter was addressed to him, John Roberts brings SCOTUS back for an unheard of Summer session since this is so timely and vital

c) President Obama calls Laity to fess up and say, "Commander Laity, you were right all along, how can I make this up to you?"

d) Nothing, like we've seen before.

:P Tough pick, take your time.
Avatar Photo: Current Logo for Fogbow's favorite show, "Mama June: From Not To Hot: "The Road To Intervention"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#668

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:21 pm

bob, your link is wonky.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#669

Post by bob » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:24 pm

Notorial Dissent wrote:
Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:21 pm
bob, your link is wonky.
:oops: Fixed.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15554
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#670

Post by Reality Check » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:29 pm

Writing letters to SCOTUS has been sooo effective. Just ask Cody Judy and Orly. :thumbs:
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12226
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#671

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:33 pm

That's Laity, our great constipational scholar all over the place.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8055
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#672

Post by Northland10 » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:53 pm

I thought Laity said that, since SCOTUS did not take up his case, his original claimed Minor ruling, "unrefuted by WKA," still stands. Why does he need them to stop "evading?" He already won.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 15554
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#673

Post by Reality Check » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:54 pm

It's the hard hitting articles like this one describing how a nobody from New York sent his trash to the Supreme Court that make the P&E what it is. :thumbs: :rotflmao:
Edit: I see the price of Laity's "book" has dropped from $10.99 to $3.99 (Kindle version) on Amazon. It must not be exactly flying off the shelves. :lol:
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#674

Post by bob » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:24 pm

P&E comment:
Miki Booth wrote:I support you and your efforts 100% Mr. Laity and will continue to pray for all of us with truth on our side. Whenever I think of CJ roberts looking at this I get frightened to my core. It will be a joyous day if and when he is removed from SCOTUS.
Obama has been out of office for over two years, so they dream of impeaching someone else over their wholly imagined wrongs.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 26662
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Laity: Last Birther (with no) Standing [was 2016 N.Y. challenges]

#675

Post by bob » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:13 pm

P&E comments:
Laity wrote:I do not know what the other 40[*] Boards of Elections cite on their websites. I know that Indiana had a faulty State Supreme Court decision (Ankeny v Governor of Indiana)[**] about what a “Natural Born Citizen” is. There are probably other States that misstate the criteria, for political reasons. However, I have 4+ US Supreme Court decisions backing me up. I never was really deeply concerned with politics until this Obama fiasco started.[***] NY State had the misstatement of Presidential election criteria a full ten years ago and they have still not corrected it. “Born a citizen” does not mean the same as “Natural Born Citizen”. The term “born a citizen” does not appear in Article II, Sec. 1 Clause 5. “Natural Born Citizen” does appear.

*
Laity wrote:Correction: The other 49 States.
57?

** Court of Appeals; de minimis.

*** :think:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Eligibility Lawsuits”