Search found 5544 matches

by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:11 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

If Rhodes's friend faxed the letter to the court, the court could post it on PACER at its leisure, which would explain the anomaly of timing. There was no rush, since Capt. Connie was on a plane, flying away to safety from the loathsome Birfers. She's safer in Iraq than in the US this week ... No F...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:59 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Sterngard Friegen wrote: Oh, and the clerk would NOT have allowed it to be filed if the clerk did not think it was real. (Remember, Larry Sinclar's POS letter outing Taitz has not been filed.) Only PARTIES and their attorneys (and the court lol ) can file stuff on PACER. So, the clerk facilitated h...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:52 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

This has been such a gratifying week.Absolutely Juicy week! God, PJ is addicting. And this week has made it even more so. I may have to put a timer limit on my visits if I ever expect to get any lectures written in the next week! Certainly my students will understand that I have been too busy to pr...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:45 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

There's an anomaly here: Time stamp on Cpt. Rhodes' fax (from an Office Max) is 13:58 date 9/18/09. That's after noon today EDT. How could she have been on her way to Iraq last night? I seriously hate to bring this up, but is it possible that this fax is fraudulent? As Rachel Maddow would say, "I n...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:43 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09



You could be right about the mailing, Mimi but in the letter she says she will mail original in Iraq. Still, she could have asked someone to fax it for her. I'm probably just being a worrywart!
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:31 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Just talked to Lily Gordon at Ledger Enquirer. She said she thinks "she [Rhodes] flew out last night for Iraq." She said, regarding the letter to the court by Rhodes "everything happened so quick" it was hard for them to put a story together. Meaning, by the time they were aware of Judge Land's dec...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:52 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09



OMG. This looks like the smoking gun.Umm...I'd say this is the OMG moment The Hun has been predicting for what seems like years now. Wonder how he likes it now that it's really here..."Beware what you ask from the gods - they just might grant it."
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Major Kook Smackdown Watch
Replies: 90
Views: 5675

Major Kook Smackdown Watch

June bug wrote: Re: the late filing question. By posting these filings (12,13,14), has the Court essentially acknowledged the appeal wasn't late or can the Court address that after these issues are dealt with? Sterngard Friegen wrote: The court will take up the late filing in good time. It may take...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:21 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Major Kook Smackdown Watch
Replies: 90
Views: 5675

Major Kook Smackdown Watch

re those Cook v. Good or Cook v. Simtech filings? The links are not live, but given that this is an appeal, I would bet they are Cook v. Good.The links work and are to Scribd, and are for Cook v Good.Re: the late filing question. By posting these filings (12,13,14), has the Court essentially acknow...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:50 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09



combatengineer wrote: I've done my part with my alter-ego.....Thank you!
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:45 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: DISBARMENT WATCH
Replies: 1625
Views: 115727

DISBARMENT WATCH



Posted by: Shallowthroat | September 18, 2009 9:29 AM
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:33 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

MOTION FOR STAY DENIED09/18/2009 17,http://ia311029.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.17.0.pdf ORDER denying 15[RECAP] Motion for Stay of Deployment filed by Connie Rhodes. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 09/18/2009. (CGC) (Entered: 09/18/2009)Beautiful: Starts...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:24 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Lola Getz wrote: They all think she's easy meat, and then she gets on and takes over the interview because they don't know how to handle her when she goes off on a tangent. Once they lose control of Orly, they never get it back to what the interviewers want to talk about, and then they run out of t...
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:45 pm
Forum: Birther Case Discussion
Topic: BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)
Replies: 7790
Views: 309175

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)



Epectitus,May I use your comment? Of course.FYI, It's already posted at the Betrayal, but have at it, no attribution necessary.Yes and Morgan Ward pays you the ultimate compliment - he hates to do it, but he completely agrees with you! Great job, Epectitus! =D> =D>
by June bug
Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:08 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Ratigan was terrible on the MSNBC interview. He didn't hold Orley's feet to the fire about Land and he was as argumentative as she was, which is saying something. I used to like him when he was practically the only sane person on CNBC. Now that he has his own show, he's decided to take a leaf from ...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:22 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: COOK V GOOD, et al. ACT II (?)
Replies: 692
Views: 39270

COOK V GOOD, et al. ACT II (?)

There is no 3-days allowed for mailing in this context. The time for filing a notice of appeal runs from the date of ENTRY of judgment, not from service or mailing of the judgment. She had sixty days under FRAP 4(a)(1)(B), but managed to file on the sixty-first day. The timing rule is interpreted s...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:54 pm
Forum: Birther Case Discussion
Topic: BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)
Replies: 7790
Views: 309175

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

PJ has the best combination of wit, wisdom and whimsy on the internet. Thanks to terrific members who do careful, exhaustive, independent research, this site is also the force to be reckoned with and both birfers and Obots know that. I'm personally delighted to have gotten to know all of the smart,...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:02 pm
Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Free Republic
Replies: 4644
Views: 349195

Free Republic

One of my favorite quotes from the freeper The Sons of Liberty: Why do the citizens have to prove 0bama’s birth status? It is up to him to prove his eligibility. He should’ve never been on the ballot in any state, until he presented proof that he was eligible. Statements by third parties, do not su...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:24 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Let the games begin again:09/17/2009 Attorney Orly Taitz admitted pro hac vice as of 9/14/09 for Cpt. Connie Rhodes. Pro hac vice fee paid 9/14/09 $100.00 Recept #404677. (nop) (Entered: 09/17/2009)... gotta get that in (officially) first ... Now, she's (officially) subject to the court's disciplin...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:05 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09



Why can't Orly spell "Columbus?"Because he wasn't a natural born citizen!
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:03 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

Pat Gund wrote:Let me think on this....."'…come to me, my little doll', Charles told Orly as she slid out of the polyester Rainbow Brite dress into his arms. Orly fluttered her eyes seductively at Charles, eyelashes waving like the mating dance of tarantulas. 'Kizz me my Charzles. Kizz me like you ...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:37 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09

I am to the point that I live just to read orly's latest pile of steaming poo, our smack downs delivered by the judge. Ad to think I spent all those years wasting my time surfing for porn!!!Oh, not wasted dmon...After the last smack down, you should use all those years of experience to create an ep...
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm
Forum: Birther Case Discussion
Topic: BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)
Replies: 7790
Views: 309175

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)

Thorswitch - May I edit further? (Plus I'm used to joints that are twisted on both ends. Wait, that sounds bad. Back when I was in college and actually saw joints,from way across campus where I was studying hard, they were twisted on both ends - how that?How that?Or even better -- while in his D.A....
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:37 pm
Forum: Birther Case Discussion
Topic: BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)
Replies: 7790
Views: 309175

BARNETT|KEYES v. OBAMA - II - DISCUSSION (9th Cir.)



Thorswitch - May I edit further?

(Plus I'm used to joints that are twisted on both ends. Wait, that sounds bad. Back when I was in college and actually saw joints,from way across campus where I was studying hard, they were twisted on both ends - how that?How that?
by June bug
Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:25 pm
Forum: Orly Taitz
Topic: Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09
Replies: 3114
Views: 152021

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al - Georgia, 9/4/09



Thanks, Neonzx!

Go to advanced search