Search found 2222 matches

by SLQ
Mon Oct 08, 2018 10:04 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: President Trump
Replies: 8675
Views: 344621

Re: President Trump

Maybe he should resign and run for mayor of Chicago then. I never understood how what was going on in Chicago was some sort of reflection on Obama. He was never mayor or had any other position where anyone could honestly say anything happened there on his watch. You can't overthink it. From Trump's...
by SLQ
Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:27 pm
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Headed off for the hospital
Replies: 82
Views: 2828

Re: Headed off for the hospital

Sugar Magnolia wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 3:48 pm
Chilidog wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:57 pm
Jeez, thanks I really didn't need to hear that.
I have 5 friends whose lives were saved by them.
I just visited with my 81-year old aunt (who is the hippest, most energetic 81-year-old I've ever seen), and she said her pacemaker has saved her live twice already.)
by SLQ
Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:01 pm
Forum: Brett Kavanaugh - Nomination for Supreme Court
Topic: Kavanaugh hearings: Avenatti casually tossing bombs
Replies: 277
Views: 6248

Re: Kavanaugh hearings: Avenatti casually tossing bombs

So why aren't we seeing Avenatti roiling about the scope of the FBI investigation to exclude Swetnik (sp). I checked his Twitter. There are more than one tweet about this, but here's a sample: https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1046732416927371264 While the "official" investigation wants to...
by SLQ
Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:27 am
Forum: Brett Kavanaugh - Nomination for Supreme Court
Topic: Kavanaugh hearings: Avenatti casually tossing bombs
Replies: 277
Views: 6248

Re: Kavanaugh hearings: Avenatti casually tossing bombs

So why aren't we seeing Avenatti roiling about the scope of the FBI investigation to exclude Swetnik (sp).
by SLQ
Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:50 am
Forum: Brett Kavanaugh - Nomination for Supreme Court
Topic: SCOTUS: Kavanaugh Nomination Hearings, September 4 2018
Replies: 1593
Views: 28183

Re: SCOTUS: Kavanaugh Nomination Hearings, September 4 2018

Aww, the faux indignation is palpable. Of course, it's a false equivalence. it does not matter how much money the actor has who portrayed Kavanaugh. And the point was not that he defended himself. it was that he was angry and crying while he tried to defend himself.
by SLQ
Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:55 pm
Forum: Teh Funny Stuffs
Topic: What's your stripper stage name?
Replies: 53
Views: 913

Re: What's your stripper stage name?

Uh . . . beige potato. I'm not expecting tips. :dance:
by SLQ
Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:20 pm
Forum: The Trump Cabinet
Topic: Jeff Sessions
Replies: 146
Views: 7388

Re: Jeff Sessions

"And my worst enemies, I mean, people that, you know, are on the other side of me, in a lot of ways including politically" also = no one.
by SLQ
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:33 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Mueller's investigation
Replies: 6741
Views: 272092

Re: Mueller's investigation

I think one absolute certainty in all that is that his lawyers are totally in the dark and that LaRump hasn't been even remotely honest with them, for one thing, I don't think he is even capable of doing so. The new lawyers haven't yet learned the lesson that lawyers for him did in business: always...
by SLQ
Sat Sep 15, 2018 12:57 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Trump - POTUS Tweets and Social Media
Replies: 4971
Views: 185023

Re: Trump - POTUS Tweets and Social Media

If Trump said there were 57 states, the news stories would point out that he was very nearly within ten percent of the actual number, and we should make allowances for his background being in business instead of the swamp. And then people would ask us to explain why those stories don't make a valid...
by SLQ
Fri Sep 14, 2018 5:01 pm
Forum: Brett Kavanaugh - Nomination for Supreme Court
Topic: SCOTUS: Kavanaugh Nomination Hearings, September 4 2018
Replies: 1593
Views: 28183

Re: SCOTUS: Kavanaugh Nomination Hearings, September 4 2018

Ms. Feinstein has been sitting on this letter since last summer? Why would she wait so long? Desperate last-ditch effort to derail Kavanaugh's appointment? For better or worse, politics is pretty theatrical, so I would expect congresscritters to play such games since ones who do not tend to get rep...
by SLQ
Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:13 pm
Forum: Elections 2018
Topic: Obama's "Delicate Dance" (Not anymore)
Replies: 32
Views: 1679

Re: Obama's "Delicate Dance" (Not anymore)

This makes me happy. Gloves off, but still classy.
by SLQ
Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:51 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Foggy - good point. What Cohen wants is a specific remedy - recision. But if the contract is void, it’s a nullify.
by SLQ
Sun Sep 09, 2018 10:42 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

At the very least, this surrender should be subject to terms, such as attorney's fees. If Stormy voluntarily dismissed under FRCP 41, Cohen and "Dennison" would demand no less.
by SLQ
Sun Sep 09, 2018 10:18 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

This is what I was remembering (Docket entry 17): MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED JURY TRIAL 16 . The Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff Stephanie Clifford's Motion for Expedited Jury Trial Pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal Arbit...
by SLQ
Sun Sep 09, 2018 9:20 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Question: How does this status report jibe with Cohen's answer (and Trump's answer, if he filed one, though IIRC, he didn't.) IIRC, hasn't gotten that far. It's (still) currently awaiting the disposition of a motion to compel arbitration. I'm looking back through this thread, because IIRC, the judg...
by SLQ
Sun Sep 09, 2018 9:06 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Question: How does this status report jibe with Cohen's answer (and Trump's answer, if he filed one, though IIRC, he didn't.)
by SLQ
Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:33 pm
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Perhaps you should give Stormy Daniels the credit she is due for being a smart, savvy woman. She has fully stated her motivations in public: to hold Individual-1 accountable. Accountable for what? Accountable for having consensual sex with her? Accountable for having Cohen pay her $130,000? Account...
by SLQ
Sat Sep 08, 2018 10:06 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

CJ Roberts wrote:
Sat Sep 08, 2018 10:04 am
Didn't it become too late to rescind or at least a portion of the $130k earned when she was silent through election day?
:yeah:
by SLQ
Sat Sep 08, 2018 10:03 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Exhibit 1:
My attorney and I are committed to making sure that everyone finds out the truth and the facts of what happened, and I give my word that we will not rest until that happens.
Stormy Daniels speech outside NYC courthouse on April 16.

by SLQ
Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:49 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

That may or may not be true - neither of us has any way to know her motivations. But it's unquestionably true that Avenatti is trying to use his client's still-pending case as the basis for a Presidential campaign. Are you seriously good with the legal ethics of that? Perhaps you should give Stormy...
by SLQ
Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:20 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

Problem is that the birthers were wrong about where President Obama’s was born ( and the motivation behind why he was born where he was born :liar: ). Foggy is right about the hush money contract and the motivation behind it). :rotflmao:
by SLQ
Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:00 am
Forum: Trump Administration
Topic: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California
Replies: 1436
Views: 47888

Re: Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels v Donald J. Trump aka David Dennison, U.S. District Court, Central California

That may or may not be true - neither of us has any way to know her motivations. But it's unquestionably true that Avenatti is trying to use his client's still-pending case as the basis for a Presidential campaign. Are you seriously good with the legal ethics of that? Perhaps you should give Stormy...

Go to advanced search