Fogbow

So assuming the cow said something that was obviously defamation per se (in a state that has defamation per se), under Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., would "The mean things the cow said about me made me cry until I got nauseous." be enough to submit a case to the jury or does it have to be hard money ...

I am NOT in anyway defending these deputies, but what is so hard about showing an ID or, in absence of, giving name and DOB? This skirts the line of "if they would just stop resisting, we wouldn't have to kill them." Just because the cops fuck up and don't know their jobs doesn't mean the citizen h...

Is he trying to say Motown? Isn't Motang some horrible mixed drink with Tang in it instead of orange juice? edit: Urban dictionary to the rescue https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Motang Motang The combination of mohawk vodka and tang. Some say its a "low end society drink". Originates...

Mississippi doesn't mention money either, except to say that "Upon a showing of slander per se, "general damages" are presumed, and additional economic damages need not be proven. " https://casetext.com/case/scott-v-spencer-gifts-llc From that case Mississippi appears to have pretty much the classi...

A humorous twitter thread summarizing today's amicus filing.

Somewhat offtopic, but another one. Tweeter speculation that it was without warning and he was either fired or quit without giving notice. https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1304525996574597124 Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney Deputy assistant AG David Morell — a member of the DOJ legal teams handling B...

I was truly unaware that "defamation" must have a monetary element attached. Like everything, it's a little more complicated than that and varies from state to state. I don't think it applies to Carroll, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#Defamation_per_se but since the early 1990's, not ...

I'm not sure I knew about this lawsuit against the Trump campaign, apparently for violating not-for-profit rules. The plaintiff is the Washington DC Attorney General. More grifting... https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/lawsuit-against-trump-inaugural-committee-can-continue-judge-rules-n12...

https://twitter.com/travisakers/status/ ... 5664892928

Travis Akers
@travisakers
JUST IN: The Oathkeepers and their founder, Stewart Rhodes, have been permanently banned by Twitter.

The group had recently encouraged violence and civil war on the social media platform.

A quick search didn't find a general Arpaio thread, so... https://twitter.com/mpolletta/status/1303808923904782336 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/09/09/former-sheriff-joe-arpaio-makes-cameo-video-arizona-furry-convention/5761920002/ (whole article because paragraphs were ...

Video: Police put hood on Black man killed by asphyxiation By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ASSOCIATED PRESS | SEP 02, 2020 AT 7:50 PM A Black man who had run naked through the streets of a western New York city died of asphyxiation after a group of police officers put a hood over his head, then pressed his...

I understand that the referal of "all suspected cases for legal enforcement." would target individual-1 in his private capacity, not protected by offcial duty? I also understand the effect of this referal may get acted upon after Jaunary 20, 2021 when the duties have been laid to rest and don't int...

Colorado Secretary of State https://twitter.com/JenaGriswold/status/1302976594626056193 Jena Griswold @JenaGriswold In Colorado, we take double voting seriously and refer all suspected cases for legal enforcement. If it makes sense, I will include @realDonaldTrump in the referral for prosecution. He...

Any idea why the FBI decided to come at them pretending to be Hamas? Because they can’t be easily convicted as domestic terrorists. However supporting foreign terrorists gets the with the Patriot Act etc. It also makes it harder for Trump or his henchman Barr to let them go. That makes sense. thank...

Any idea why the FBI decided to come at them pretending to be Hamas?

They have an 105 year old plaintiff who was a victim of the riot. For reference, the OK Nuisance statute they are suing under. https://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/2006/os50.html edit: I read/skimmed the whole thing. I wasn't aware of everything that went on after the race riot. They literally decl...

A Federal District judge in California has issued a TRO enjoining winding down the census until a hearing on 9-17. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/05/909745230/census-work-was-winding-down-but-a-judge-says-it-needs-to-press-on-for-now Census Work Was Winding Down, But A Judge Says It Needs To Press On F...

I think the original Q (there's considerable evidence that the person or group of people posting as Q now is not the same as the author of the first few Q posts in late 2017) was a Poe . It was satire similar to the "Navy SEAL copypasta" - basically throwing out random jargon to parody Pizzagate an...

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2020 2:54 pm

Dan1100 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2020 1:36 pm Once again, as it does every year, my Google Calendar has reminded me that on this day in 2014, Barrack Obama wore a tan suit to work.

A day that will live in infamy.

Ironically, the same day as the "I have a dream" speech.

Once again, as it does every year, my Google Calendar has reminded me that on this day in 2014, Barrack Obama wore a tan suit to work.

New NY State AG suit. edit: **Tweeter thinks it is a Motion for Order to Show Cause over the production of documents.** Edit again: Sheri Dillon is a tax lawyer. https://www.morganlewis.com/bios/sdillon Eric is a named defendant along with lots of LLC's. https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/12...

:snippity: :snippity: * * * I am out on a limb here, but it is entirely possible that Vance has everything needed, but it was obtained through some back door and cannot be used in court. This process will legitimize the evidence so it can be used. Fruit of the poisonous tree . If someone covertly m...

chancery wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:42 pm https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/21/politics ... index.html

Vance has agreed not to enforce the subpoena for seven days.

thank you...

Can someone help me understand why the accountants aren't turning over the records right now? I looked at FRCP 62 https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_62 and FRAP 8 https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_8, and it seems to be that the lower court denied the injunction and refuse to stay ...